Land Rover Evoque Coupe AT (2015) vs Toyota Land Cruiser Prado 2.4 Turbo AT (2025)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Land Rover Evoque Coupe AT (2015) vs Toyota Land Cruiser Prado 2.4 Turbo AT (2025) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Land Rover Evoque Coupe AT (2015) Land Rover ₱5,500,000 | Toyota Land Cruiser Prado 2.4 Turbo AT (2025) Toyota ₱4,806,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2015 | 2025 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 3-years/100,000km |
| Availability | Current | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 1999cc | 2393cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-valve | DOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Turbo Direct Injection | Turbocharged |
| Fuel Type | Gas | Gasoline |
| Max Power | 240 PS @ 5500 rpm | 281 PS @ 6000 rpm |
| Max Torque | 339 Nm @ 1750 rpm | 430 Nm @ 1700 - 3600 rpm |
| Transmission | 6-Speed A/T | 8-A/T |
| Drivetrain | 4WD | 4WD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Crossover | Large Crossover SUV |
| Segment | J | SUV |
| Construction | Unibody | Body-on-frame |
| Doors | 3 | 5 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3 | 2+3+2 |
| Length (mm) | 4365 | 4925 |
| Width (mm) | 1965 | 1980 |
| Height (mm) | 1605 | 1935 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2660 | 2850 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 1640 | 2400 |
| Exterior Colors | — | Black Mica, Pearl White Mica, Avant-Garde Bronze |
| Fuel Tank (L) | — | 110 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | MacPherson | Double Wishbone, Coil Spring |
| Rear Suspension | Multi-Link | Multi-Link w/ Coil Spring |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Steering Type | hydraulic | EPS |
| Steering Column | tilt | Tilt + Telescopic |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | Yes |
| Differential Lock | No | Yes |
| Front Wheels | — | 20 |
| Rear Wheels | — | 20 |
| Front Tires | — | 265/60/R20 |
| Rear Tires | — | 265/60/R20 |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | No | No |
| Parking Sensors | No | No |
| Stability Control | Yes | No |
| Traction Control | No | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | Yes |
| Hill Start Assist | No | Yes |
| Hill Descent Control | No | Yes |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | No | No |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | No | No |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | No |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Engine Immobilizer | — | Yes |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Auto Climate Control System | Dual Zone Automatic Climate Control |
| Rear A/C Vents | No | No |
| Seat Material | Leather | Leather |
| Parking Brake | Electronic | EPB |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | No | No |
| Cruise Control | No | Yes |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | No |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | Yes | Yes |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | Yes |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Touchscreen | No | Yes |
| Navigation | No | Yes |
| Bluetooth | No | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | No | Yes |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| AUX Input | Yes | No |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | No |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | No |
| iPod Support | Yes | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Speakers | — | 10 |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | HID + Foglamps | LED |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | — | Yes |
Land Rover Evoque Coupe AT (2015) vs Toyota Land Cruiser Prado 2.4 Turbo AT (2025): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer looking for a capable and versatile vehicle with good power output and reliability, the Land Rover Evoque Coupe AT is recommended over the Toyota Land Cruiser Prado 2.4 Turbo AT. The Evoque offers better fuel efficiency, a more modern design, and a more luxurious driving experience despite its higher price point. For those who prioritize affordability and practicality in daily commuting scenarios, the Toyota Land Cruiser Prado is a solid choice with its robust construction, ample space, and reliable power output.
Frequently asked questions
Which vehicle has better fuel efficiency?
The Land Rover Evoque Coupe AT offers better fuel efficiency compared to the Toyota Land Cruiser Prado 2.4 Turbo AT.
Which vehicle is more powerful?
The Toyota Land Cruiser Prado 2.4 Turbo AT delivers more power with a maximum of 281 PS, while the Land Rover Evoque Coupe AT has 240 PS.
Which vehicle is better for daily commuting?
For daily commuting, the Toyota Land Cruiser Prado 2.4 Turbo AT offers better practicality and space due to its five doors and seating capacity of 2+3+2, making it more suitable for families or those with larger groups.
Which vehicle has a longer warranty period?
The Toyota Land Cruiser Prado 2.4 Turbo AT comes with a 3-year/100,000km warranty, while the Land Rover Evoque Coupe AT offers a 3-years/100,000km warranty as well.