Land Rover Range Rover 3.0 TD V6 AT Dsl (2015) vs Toyota Land Cruiser Prado 2.4 Turbo AT (2025)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Land Rover Range Rover 3.0 TD V6 AT Dsl (2015) vs Toyota Land Cruiser Prado 2.4 Turbo AT (2025) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Land Rover Range Rover 3.0 TD V6 AT Dsl (2015) Land Rover ₱9,500,000 | Toyota Land Cruiser Prado 2.4 Turbo AT (2025) Toyota ₱4,806,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2015 | 2025 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 3-years/100,000km |
| Availability | Current | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | V6 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 2993cc | 2393cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 24-Valve | DOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Turbo Diesel | Turbocharged |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Max Power | 258 PS | 281 PS @ 6000 rpm |
| Max Torque | 600 Nm | 430 Nm @ 1700 - 3600 rpm |
| Transmission | 8-Speed A/T | 8-A/T |
| Drivetrain | AWD | 4WD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | SUV | Large Crossover SUV |
| Segment | J | SUV |
| Construction | Unibody | Body-on-frame |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3 | 2+3+2 |
| Length (mm) | 4999 | 4925 |
| Width (mm) | 2220 | 1980 |
| Height (mm) | 1835 | 1935 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2922 | 2850 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 2160 | 2400 |
| Exterior Colors | — | Black Mica, Pearl White Mica, Avant-Garde Bronze |
| Fuel Tank (L) | — | 110 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | SLA w/ Twin Lower Links, Air Springs, Adaptive Damping | Double Wishbone, Coil Spring |
| Rear Suspension | Integral Link w/ Air Springs, Adaptive Damping | Multi-Link w/ Coil Spring |
| Front Wheels | 19" Alloys | 20 |
| Rear Wheels | 19" Alloys | 20 |
| Front Tires | 255/55H/R19 | 265/60/R20 |
| Rear Tires | 255/55H/R19 | 265/60/R20 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Steering Type | hydraulic | EPS |
| Steering Column | tilt | Tilt + Telescopic |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | Yes |
| Differential Lock | No | Yes |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | Yes | No |
| Parking Sensors | No | No |
| Stability Control | No | No |
| Traction Control | No | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | Yes |
| Hill Start Assist | No | Yes |
| Hill Descent Control | Yes | Yes |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | No | No |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | No | No |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | No |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Engine Immobilizer | — | Yes |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Dual-Zone Electronic Climate Control | Dual Zone Automatic Climate Control |
| Rear A/C Vents | No | No |
| Seat Material | Leather | Leather |
| Parking Brake | Electronic | EPB |
| Key Type | Comfort Access Smart Key | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | No | No |
| Cruise Control | No | Yes |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | No |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | No | Yes |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | Yes |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Touchscreen | No | Yes |
| Navigation | No | Yes |
| Bluetooth | No | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | No | Yes |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| AUX Input | Yes | No |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | No |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | No |
| iPod Support | No | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Speakers | — | 10 |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | HID + Foglamps | LED |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | — | Yes |
Land Rover Range Rover 3.0 TD V6 AT Dsl (2015) vs Toyota Land Cruiser Prado 2.4 Turbo AT (2025): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer looking for a diesel engine with high torque and power output, the Land Rover Range Rover 3.0 TD V6 AT Dsl is the better choice. It offers more power than the Toyota Land Cruiser Prado and a higher torque rating of 600 Nm compared to 430 Nm. The Range Rover also comes with a longer warranty period of 100,000km/3-years versus the Toyota's 100,000km/3-years. For those who prioritize practicality and daily commuting, the Toyota Land Cruiser Prado is preferable due to its stronger torque output and four-wheel drive system.
Frequently asked questions
Which vehicle has better towing capacity?
The data provided does not specify towing capacities for both vehicles. However, the Range Rover typically offers higher power and torque which could potentially make it more suitable for towing heavy loads compared to the Prado.