Land Rover Range Rover Sport V8 AT (2015) vs Toyota Land Cruiser Prado 2.4 Turbo AT (2025)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Land Rover Range Rover Sport V8 AT (2015) vs Toyota Land Cruiser Prado 2.4 Turbo AT (2025) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Land Rover Range Rover Sport V8 AT (2015) Land Rover ₱6,950,000 | Toyota Land Cruiser Prado 2.4 Turbo AT (2025) Toyota ₱4,806,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2015 | 2025 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 3-years/100,000km |
| Availability | Current | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | V8 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 4999cc | 2393cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 32-valve | DOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Supercharged | Turbocharged |
| Fuel Type | Gas | Gasoline |
| Max Power | 510 PS @ 6000-6500 rpm | 281 PS @ 6000 rpm |
| Max Torque | 624 Nm @ 2500 - 5500 rpm | 430 Nm @ 1700 - 3600 rpm |
| Transmission | 6-Speed A/T | 8-A/T |
| Drivetrain | AWD | 4WD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | SUV | Large Crossover SUV |
| Segment | J | SUV |
| Construction | Body-On-Frame | Body-on-frame |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3 | 2+3+2 |
| Length (mm) | 4783 | 4925 |
| Width (mm) | 1932 | 1980 |
| Height (mm) | 1785 | 1935 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2745 | 2850 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 2590 | 2400 |
| Exterior Colors | — | Black Mica, Pearl White Mica, Avant-Garde Bronze |
| Fuel Tank (L) | — | 110 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | Double Wishbone | Double Wishbone, Coil Spring |
| Rear Suspension | Multi-Link | Multi-Link w/ Coil Spring |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Steering Type | hydraulic | EPS |
| Steering Column | tilt | Tilt + Telescopic |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | Yes |
| Differential Lock | No | Yes |
| Front Wheels | — | 20 |
| Rear Wheels | — | 20 |
| Front Tires | — | 265/60/R20 |
| Rear Tires | — | 265/60/R20 |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | No | No |
| Parking Sensors | No | No |
| Stability Control | Yes | No |
| Traction Control | No | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | Yes |
| Hill Start Assist | No | Yes |
| Hill Descent Control | No | Yes |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | No | No |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | No | No |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | No |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Engine Immobilizer | — | Yes |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Auto Climate Control System | Dual Zone Automatic Climate Control |
| Rear A/C Vents | No | No |
| Seat Material | Leather | Leather |
| Parking Brake | Electronic | EPB |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | No | No |
| Cruise Control | No | Yes |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | No |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | Yes | Yes |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | Yes |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Touchscreen | No | Yes |
| Navigation | No | Yes |
| Bluetooth | No | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | No | Yes |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | No | Yes |
| AUX Input | Yes | No |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | No |
| DVD Player | Yes | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | No |
| iPod Support | No | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Speakers | — | 10 |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | HID + Foglamps | LED |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | — | Yes |
Land Rover Range Rover Sport V8 AT (2015) vs Toyota Land Cruiser Prado 2.4 Turbo AT (2025): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer prioritizing power and practicality, the Land Rover Range Rover Sport V8 AT (2015) is the better choice. It offers significantly more power with 510 PS compared to the Toyota Land Cruiser Prado's 281 PS. The Land Rover also has AWD for added off-road capability and a longer wheelbase at 4783 mm, making it more suitable for those who need a vehicle that can handle rough terrain easily. While the Toyota is cheaper, its power output is less impressive, and it lacks the Range Rover's advanced features and luxury.
Frequently asked questions
Which car has better performance?
The Land Rover Range Rover Sport V8 AT (2015) outperforms the Toyota Land Cruiser Prado with a higher maximum power of 510 PS compared to the 281 PS of the Toyota.
Who needs more off-road capability?
Those who need more off-road capability should choose the Land Rover Range Rover Sport V8 AT (2015) due to its AWD system and longer wheelbase at 4783 mm, which provides better traction on uneven terrain.
Which car is cheaper?
The Toyota Land Cruiser Prado 2.4 Turbo AT (2025) is the more affordable option with a price of ₱4,806,000 compared to the Range Rover Sport V8 AT (2015)'s ₱6,950,000.
Which car has better fuel efficiency?
The Toyota Land Cruiser Prado 2.4 Turbo AT (2025) is not specified for fuel efficiency in the data provided, but it generally offers better fuel economy than the Range Rover Sport V8 AT (2015).