Mazda 3 Hatchback SkyActiv-R AT (2015) vs Mitsubishi ASX GLS (2017)

A full spec-by-spec comparison of Mazda 3 Hatchback SkyActiv-R AT (2015) vs Mitsubishi ASX GLS (2017) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.

Specification Mazda 3 Hatchback SkyActiv-R AT (2015) Mazda ₱1,268,000 Mitsubishi ASX GLS (2017) Mitsubishi ₱1,215,000
Overview
Model Year 2015 2017
Warranty 100,000km/3-years 100,000 km/3-years
Availability Discontinued Current
Engine & Drivetrain
Engine Type Inline-4 Inline-4
Displacement 1998cc 1998cc
Valvetrain DOHC 16-valve DOHC 16-valve
Aspiration Naturally Aspirated, S-VT Naturally Aspirated MIVEC
Fuel Type Gas Gas
Max Power 155 PS @ 6000 rpm 150 PS @ 6000 rpm
Max Torque 200 Nm @ 4000 rpm 197 Nm @ 4200 rpm
Transmission 6-Speed A/T CVT
Drivetrain FWD FWD
Body & Dimensions
Body Type Sedan Crossover
Segment C J
Construction Unibody Unibody
Doors 4 5
Seating Capacity 2+3 5
Length (mm) 4580 4295
Width (mm) 1795 1770
Height (mm) 1450 1625
Wheelbase (mm) 2700 2670
Curb Weight (kg) 1304 1350
Fuel Tank (L) — 63
Chassis, Wheels & Brakes
Front Suspension MacPherson MacPherson Strut Coil Spring with Stabilizer
Rear Suspension Multi-Link Multi-Link Coil Spring with Stabilizer
Front Wheels 18x7.0" Alloys 17x6.5
Rear Wheels 18x7.0" Alloys 17x6.5
Front Tires 215/45/R18 215/60 R17
Rear Tires 215/45/R18 215/60 R17
Front Brakes Disc Disc
Rear Brakes Disc Disc
Steering Type hydraulic Electronic
Steering Column tilt tilt and telescopic
Tire Pressure Monitoring No Yes
Differential Lock No No
Safety
Anti-lock Braking (ABS) Yes Yes
Electronic Brakeforce Distribution Yes Yes
Brake Assist Yes Yes
Parking Sensors No Yes
Stability Control No No
Traction Control No No
Vehicle Dynamic Control No No
Forward Collision Mitigation No No
Blind Spot Warning No No
Hill Start Assist No No
Hill Descent Control No No
Auto Stop/Start No No
Driver Airbag No Yes
Knee Airbag No No
Passenger Airbag No Yes
Front Curtain Airbags No No
Rear Curtain Airbags No No
Rear Side Airbags No No
Security Alarm Yes Yes
Door Locking Central Locking Central Locking
Engine Immobilizer — Yes
Comfort & Convenience
Air Conditioning Automatic Climate Control Automatic Climate Control
Rear A/C Vents No Yes
Seat Material Leather Leather
Parking Brake Manual Manual
Key Type Keyless Entry Keyless Entry
Push-Button Start No Yes
Cruise Control No Yes
Multi-Info Display Yes Yes
Paddle Shifters No Yes
Reverse Camera No Yes
Auto Headlights No Yes
Power Windows Yes Yes
Power Seats No No
Remote Trunk Release No No
Eco Mode No No
Antenna yes yes
Infotainment & Audio
Touchscreen Yes Yes
Navigation No Yes
Bluetooth Yes Yes
Apple CarPlay No Yes
Android Auto No Yes
USB Yes Yes
AUX Input Yes Yes
AM/FM Radio Yes Yes
CD Player Yes Yes
DVD Player No Yes
MP3 Playback Yes Yes
iPod Support No Yes
SD Card Slot No No
Speakers — 6
Lighting
Headlights HID + Foglamps HID
Fog Lights Yes Yes
Daytime Running Lights — Yes
Performance & Economy
Emission Standard — Euro-4
Keep comparing Add another model to this matchup — line up to four side by side.

Mazda 3 Hatchback SkyActiv-R AT (2015) vs Mitsubishi ASX GLS (2017): which should you buy?

For a Filipino buyer looking for a reliable and practical hatchback with good fuel efficiency, the Mazda 3 Hatchback SkyActiv-R AT is a strong choice despite being discontinued. The Mitsubishi ASX GLS offers more passengers and better features but at a higher price point. Both have similar power outputs and transmissions, making them suitable for different needs.

Frequently asked questions

Which vehicle is cheaper between the Mazda 3 and the Mitsubishi ASX?

The Mazda 3 Hatchback SkyActiv-R AT starts at ₱1,268,000 while the Mitsubishi ASX GLS begins at ₱1,215,000. The Mazda is slightly cheaper but both are within a similar price range for their respective segments.

Which vehicle has better fuel efficiency?

Both vehicles use naturally aspirated engines and have similar power outputs, so they should offer comparable fuel efficiency. However, the Mitsubishi ASX GLS might benefit from its CVT transmission which can improve fuel economy compared to a 6-speed automatic in the Mazda.

Which vehicle is better for daily commuting?

Both vehicles are suitable for daily commuting due to their FWD setup and similar power outputs. The Mazda's SkyActiv-R technology might offer slightly better handling, but either would be fine for typical urban driving needs.

Which vehicle has more passenger space?

The Mitsubishi ASX GLS offers 5 seats compared to the Mazda 3 Hatchback SkyActiv-R AT which has only 2+3 seating capacity. The larger number of passengers in the ASX makes it a better choice for families or groups of friends.