Mazda BT-50 2.2L 4×2 AT Dsl (2015) vs Toyota Hiace Commuter (2020)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Mazda BT-50 2.2L 4×2 AT Dsl (2015) vs Toyota Hiace Commuter (2020) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Mazda BT-50 2.2L 4×2 AT Dsl (2015) Mazda ₱1,350,000 | Toyota Hiace Commuter (2020) Toyota ₱1,396,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2015 | 2020 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 3-years/100,000 km |
| Availability | Discontinued | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 2184cc | 2982cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-valve | DOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | VGT Intercooler CRDI | Turbocharged |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Diesel |
| Max Power | 150 PS @ 3700 rpm | 136 PS @ 3400 rpm |
| Max Torque | 375 Nm @ 1500-2500 rpm | 300 Nm @ 1200 - 2400 rpm |
| Transmission | 6-Speed A/T | 5-speed M/T |
| Drivetrain | RWD | RWD |
| Compression Ratio | — | 16.0 |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Pickup | Van |
| Segment | Pickup | Van |
| Construction | Body-on-frame | Body-on-frame |
| Doors | 4 | 5 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3 | 3 |
| Length (mm) | 5365 | 4695 |
| Width (mm) | 1850 | 1695 |
| Height (mm) | 1815 | 1980 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 3220 | 2570 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 1964 | 2475 |
| Exterior Colors | — | White |
| Fuel Tank (L) | — | 70 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | Double Wishbone | Double Wishbone w/ Coil Spring |
| Rear Suspension | Rigid Axle | Leaf Spring |
| Front Wheels | 17x8.0" Alloys | 15 |
| Rear Wheels | 17x8.0" Alloys | 15 |
| Front Tires | 265/65/R17 | 195/R15 |
| Rear Tires | 265/65/R17 | 195/R15 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Drum | Drum |
| Steering Type | hydraulic | Hydraulic |
| Steering Column | tilt | Tilt |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | No |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | No |
| Brake Assist | Yes | No |
| Parking Sensors | No | No |
| Stability Control | No | No |
| Traction Control | No | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | No | No |
| Hill Descent Control | No | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | No | No |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | No | No |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | No |
| Security Alarm | Yes | No |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Manual Locking |
| Engine Immobilizer | — | No |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Automatic Climate Control | Dual Manual Airconditioning |
| Rear A/C Vents | No | No |
| Seat Material | Leather | Vinyl |
| Parking Brake | Manual | Manual |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Standard Key |
| Push-Button Start | No | No |
| Cruise Control | No | No |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | No |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | No | No |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Touchscreen | No | No |
| Navigation | No | No |
| Bluetooth | Yes | No |
| Apple CarPlay | No | No |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| AUX Input | Yes | Yes |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | Yes |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | Yes |
| iPod Support | No | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Speakers | — | 2 |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | Halogen + Foglamps | Halogen |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | — | No |
Mazda BT-50 2.2L 4×2 AT Dsl (2015) vs Toyota Hiace Commuter (2020): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer looking for a reliable and practical vehicle with good power output, the Mazda BT-50 2.2L is recommended over the Toyota Hiace Commuter. The BT-50 offers better fuel efficiency and more torque at lower RPMs, making it suitable for those who need to carry heavy loads or tow trailers. Additionally, its warranty of 100,000km/3-years is longer than the Hiace's 3-years/100,000 km. For those on a tight budget, the BT-50 is cheaper at ₱1,350,000 compared to the Hiace's ₱1,396,000 price.
Frequently asked questions
Which vehicle has better fuel efficiency?
The Mazda BT-50 2.2L has a higher torque output and operates at lower RPMs, which can indicate better fuel efficiency for heavy loads or towing.
Which car is more powerful?
The Toyota Hiace Commuter with its turbocharged engine produces 136 PS @ 3400 rpm, while the Mazda BT-50 has a max power of 150 PS @ 3700 rpm. The BT-50 is thus slightly more powerful.
Which vehicle is better for daily commuting?
The Mazda BT-50 offers a longer warranty and is cheaper at ₱1,350,000 compared to the Hiace's ₱1,396,000 price. Its higher torque output makes it more suitable for carrying heavy loads or towing.
Which car has better exterior colors?
The Toyota Hiace Commuter is available in white as an exterior color option only.