Mazda BT-50 2.2L 4×2 MT Dsl (2015) vs Mitsubishi ASX GLS (2017)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Mazda BT-50 2.2L 4×2 MT Dsl (2015) vs Mitsubishi ASX GLS (2017) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Mazda BT-50 2.2L 4×2 MT Dsl (2015) Mazda ₱1,300,000 | Mitsubishi ASX GLS (2017) Mitsubishi ₱1,215,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2015 | 2017 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 100,000 km/3-years |
| Availability | Discontinued | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 2184cc | 1998cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-valve | DOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | VGT Intercooler CRDI | Naturally Aspirated MIVEC |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gas |
| Max Power | 150 PS @ 3700 rpm | 150 PS @ 6000 rpm |
| Max Torque | 375 Nm @ 1500-2500 rpm | 197 Nm @ 4200 rpm |
| Transmission | 6-Speed M/T | CVT |
| Drivetrain | RWD | FWD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Pickup | Crossover |
| Segment | Pickup | J |
| Construction | Body-on-frame | Unibody |
| Doors | 4 | 5 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3 | 5 |
| Length (mm) | 5365 | 4295 |
| Width (mm) | 1850 | 1770 |
| Height (mm) | 1815 | 1625 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 3220 | 2670 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 1944 | 1350 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | — | 63 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | Double Wishbone | MacPherson Strut Coil Spring with Stabilizer |
| Rear Suspension | Rigid Axle | Multi-Link Coil Spring with Stabilizer |
| Front Wheels | 17x8.0" Alloys | 17x6.5 |
| Rear Wheels | 17x8.0" Alloys | 17x6.5 |
| Front Tires | 265/65/R17 | 215/60 R17 |
| Rear Tires | 265/65/R17 | 215/60 R17 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Drum | Disc |
| Steering Type | hydraulic | Electronic |
| Steering Column | tilt | tilt and telescopic |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | Yes |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | Yes | Yes |
| Parking Sensors | No | Yes |
| Stability Control | No | No |
| Traction Control | No | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | No | No |
| Hill Descent Control | No | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | No | Yes |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | No | Yes |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | — | Yes |
| Security Alarm | — | Yes |
| Door Locking | — | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Manual Aircon | Automatic Climate Control |
| Rear A/C Vents | No | Yes |
| Seat Material | Leather | Leather |
| Parking Brake | Manual | Manual |
| Push-Button Start | No | Yes |
| Cruise Control | No | Yes |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | Yes |
| Reverse Camera | No | Yes |
| Auto Headlights | No | Yes |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | No | No |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Key Type | — | Keyless Entry |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Touchscreen | No | Yes |
| Navigation | No | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | No | Yes |
| Android Auto | No | Yes |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| AUX Input | Yes | Yes |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | Yes |
| DVD Player | No | Yes |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | Yes |
| iPod Support | No | Yes |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Speakers | — | 6 |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | Halogen + Foglamps | HID |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | — | Yes |
| Performance & Economy | ||
| Emission Standard | — | Euro-4 |
Mazda BT-50 2.2L 4×2 MT Dsl (2015) vs Mitsubishi ASX GLS (2017): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer looking for a reliable and practical pickup truck with good fuel efficiency, the Mazda BT-50 might be a better fit due to its diesel engine and manual transmission which offer better economy compared to the Mitsubishi ASX's CVT. The BT-50 also has more seating capacity and is available in RWD while the ASX offers FWD. For those who prioritize daily commuting or city driving, the ASX with its 1998cc inline-4 engine and CVT transmission could be a better choice as it provides smoother acceleration and better fuel economy.
Frequently asked questions
Which vehicle is cheaper between Mazda BT-50 and Mitsubishi ASX?
The Mazda BT-50 starts at ₱1,300,000 while the Mitsubishi ASX GLS costs ₱1,215,000.
Which vehicle has better power output?
Both vehicles have identical maximum power of 150 PS, but the Mazda BT-50's torque is higher at 375 Nm compared to the Mitsubishi ASX's 197 Nm.
Which vehicle is more suitable for daily commuting or city driving?
The Mitsubishi ASX with its naturally aspirated inline-4 engine and CVT transmission might be better suited for daily commuting due to smoother acceleration and improved fuel economy.
Which vehicle offers a higher seating capacity?
The Mazda BT-50 has a seating capacity of 2+3 while the Mitsubishi ASX GLS offers 5 seats, making it slightly more suitable for larger families or groups.