Mazda BT-50 3.2L 4×4 AT Dsl (2015) vs GAC Aion V Elite (2026)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Mazda BT-50 3.2L 4×4 AT Dsl (2015) vs GAC Aion V Elite (2026) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Mazda BT-50 3.2L 4×4 AT Dsl (2015) Mazda ₱1,490,000 | GAC Aion V Elite (2026) GAC ₱1,498,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2015 | 2026 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 8-year / 160,000 km |
| Availability | Discontinued | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-5 | Electric Motor |
| Displacement | 3189cc | — |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 20-valve | — |
| Aspiration | VGT Intercooler CRDI | — |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Electric |
| Max Power | 200 PS @ 3000 rpm | 183 PS |
| Max Torque | 470 Nm @ 1500-2750 rpm | 240 Nm |
| Transmission | 6-Speed A/T | Automatic |
| Drivetrain | RWD | FWD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Pickup | Midsize Crossover SUV |
| Segment | Pickup | Crossover |
| Construction | Body-on-frame | Unibody |
| Doors | 4 | 5 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3 | 2+3 |
| Length (mm) | 5365 | 4605 |
| Width (mm) | 1850 | 1854 |
| Height (mm) | 1815 | 1686 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 3220 | 2775 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 2003 | 1950 |
| Exterior Colors | — | Sahara Sand, Onyx Black, Alpine White, Volcano Orange, Aurora Silver, Iceland Grey, Volcano Orange with White Roof |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | Double Wishbone | MacPherson Strut w/ Coil Spring |
| Rear Suspension | Rigid Axle | Torsion beam w/Coil Spring |
| Front Wheels | 17x8.0" Alloys | 19 |
| Rear Wheels | 17x8.0" Alloys | 19 |
| Front Tires | 265/65/R17 | 235/55R19 |
| Rear Tires | 265/65/R17 | 235/55R19 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Drum | Disc |
| Steering Type | hydraulic | EPS |
| Steering Column | tilt | Tilt |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | Yes |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | Yes | No |
| Parking Sensors | No | No |
| Stability Control | No | No |
| Traction Control | No | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | No | Yes |
| Hill Descent Control | No | Yes |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | No | No |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | No | No |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | No |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Engine Immobilizer | — | Yes |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Automatic Climate Control | Automatic Climate Control Dual Zone |
| Rear A/C Vents | No | No |
| Seat Material | Leather | Leather |
| Parking Brake | Manual | EPB |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | No | No |
| Cruise Control | No | No |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | No |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | No | Yes |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | Yes |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Touchscreen | No | Yes |
| Navigation | No | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | No | Yes |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | No |
| AUX Input | Yes | No |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | No |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | No |
| iPod Support | No | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Speakers | — | 9 |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | Halogen + Foglamps | LED |
| Fog Lights | Yes | No |
| Daytime Running Lights | — | Yes |
Mazda BT-50 3.2L 4×4 AT Dsl (2015) vs GAC Aion V Elite (2026): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer looking for a diesel-powered pickup truck with decent power and towing capacity, the Mazda BT-50 is more suitable given its better fuel efficiency and practicality in daily use compared to the GAC Aion V. The Mazda offers 200PS at 3000rpm and 470Nm of torque which makes it ideal for towing and rough terrain handling. In contrast, the electric SUV from GAC is more suited for city driving and urban environments where its zero-emission capability and spacious interior make it a better fit.
Frequently asked questions
Which vehicle has better fuel efficiency?
The Mazda BT-50's engine type is diesel which generally offers better fuel efficiency compared to an electric motor in the GAC Aion V, especially for long trips.
Who would prefer the Mazda BT-50 over the GAC Aion V?
A buyer looking for a practical pickup truck with towing capabilities and good fuel economy would likely prefer the Mazda BT-50 as it offers 200PS at 3000rpm and 470Nm of torque, making it suitable for heavy-duty tasks.
Which vehicle is more powerful?
The GAC Aion V has a max power of 183 PS compared to the Mazda BT-50's 200 PS. However, both vehicles offer decent power for their respective segments and uses.
Who would benefit more from the Mazda BT-50’s practicality?
The Mazda BT-50 is better suited for daily commuting due to its towing capacity of up to 3500kg and a spacious interior with seating for 2+3 passengers, making it ideal for frequent use.