Mazda CX-5 2.0 SkyActiv Maxx AT (2015) vs Mitsubishi Xpander GLS AT (2026)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Mazda CX-5 2.0 SkyActiv Maxx AT (2015) vs Mitsubishi Xpander GLS AT (2026) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Mazda CX-5 2.0 SkyActiv Maxx AT (2015) Mazda ₱1,345,000 | Mitsubishi Xpander GLS AT (2026) Mitsubishi ₱1,259,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2015 | 2026 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 3-years/100,000 km |
| Availability | Discontinued | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 1988cc | 1459cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-valve | DOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Naturally Aspirated, i-STOP | Naturally Aspirated |
| Fuel Type | Gas | Gasoline |
| Max Power | 155 PS @ 6000 rpm | 105 PS |
| Max Torque | 200 Nm @ 4000 rpm | 141 Nm |
| Transmission | 6-Speed A/T | Automatic 4-Speed |
| Drivetrain | FWD | FWD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | SUV | MPV AUV |
| Segment | J | MPV |
| Construction | Unibody | Unibody |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3 | 2+3+2 |
| Length (mm) | 4540 | 4595 |
| Width (mm) | 1840 | 1750 |
| Height (mm) | 1670 | 1750 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2700 | 2775 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 1451 | 1260 |
| Exterior Colors | — | Green Bronze Metallic With Black Roof. Quartz White Pearl With Black Roof, Sunrise Orange Metallic With Black Roof |
| Fuel Tank (L) | — | 45 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | MacPherson Strut | MacPherson Strut w/Coil Spring |
| Rear Suspension | Multi-Link | Torsion beam w/Coil Spring |
| Front Wheels | 17x7.0 alloys | 17 |
| Rear Wheels | 17x7.0 alloys | 17 |
| Front Tires | 225/65/R17 | 205/55R17 |
| Rear Tires | 225/65/R17 | 205/55R17 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Disc | Drum |
| Steering Type | hydraulic | EPS |
| Steering Column | tilt | Tilt & Telescope |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | Yes | No |
| Parking Sensors | No | No |
| Stability Control | No | No |
| Traction Control | No | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | No | Yes |
| Hill Descent Control | No | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | No | No |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | No | No |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | No |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Engine Immobilizer | — | Yes |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Manual Aircon | Automatic Climate Control |
| Rear A/C Vents | No | No |
| Seat Material | Fabric | Fabric |
| Parking Brake | Manual | EPB |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | No | No |
| Cruise Control | No | Yes |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | No |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | No | No |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | no |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Touchscreen | No | Yes |
| Navigation | No | No |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | No | Yes |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | No |
| AUX Input | Yes | No |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | No |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | No |
| iPod Support | No | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Speakers | — | 6 |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | Halogen | LED |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | — | Yes |
Mazda CX-5 2.0 SkyActiv Maxx AT (2015) vs Mitsubishi Xpander GLS AT (2026): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer seeking a reliable and spacious vehicle with good fuel efficiency, the Mitsubishi Xpander GLS AT seems to be a better fit. It offers more power, practicality in terms of seating capacity, and is available at a lower price point compared to the Mazda CX-5. The Xpander also benefits from current availability and a slightly longer warranty period.
Frequently asked questions
Which vehicle has better fuel efficiency?
The data provided does not specify fuel efficiency figures for either vehicle. However, both are powered by gasoline engines.
Is one of these vehicles more powerful than the other?
Yes, the Mitsubishi Xpander GLS AT is more powerful with 105 PS compared to the Mazda CX-5's 155 PS.
Which vehicle is better for daily commuting?
The Mitsubishi Xpander GLS AT might be a better choice for daily commuting due to its lower price and practical seating capacity of 2+3+2, which can accommodate more passengers easily.
Which warranty period is longer between the two vehicles?
The Mitsubishi Xpander GLS AT comes with a 3-year/100,000 km warranty, while the Mazda CX-5 has a 3-years/100,000 km warranty as well. Both have the same warranty period.