Mini Countryman S 1.6 AT (2015) vs Ford Mustang Mach-E Premium AWD (2026)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Mini Countryman S 1.6 AT (2015) vs Ford Mustang Mach-E Premium AWD (2026) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Mini Countryman S 1.6 AT (2015) Mini ₱3,050,000 | Ford Mustang Mach-E Premium AWD (2026) Ford ₱3,499,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2015 | 2026 |
| Warranty | Unlimited/2-years | 3-years/100,000 km |
| Availability | Discontinued | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Electric Motor |
| Displacement | 1598cc | — |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-valve | — |
| Compression Ratio | 10.5 | — |
| Aspiration | Turbocharged & Intercooled | — |
| Fuel Type | Gas | Electric |
| Max Power | 184 PS @ 5500-6500 | 394 PS |
| Max Torque | 240 Nm @ 1600-5000 rpm | 676 Nm |
| Transmission | 6-speed A/T | Automatic |
| Drivetrain | FWD | AWD |
| Performance & Economy | ||
| 0–100 km/h | 7.9 sec | — |
| Top Speed | 210km/h | — |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Crossover | Midsize Crossover SUV |
| Segment | J | SUV |
| Construction | Unibody | Unibody |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3 | 2+3 |
| Length (mm) | 4109 | 4713 |
| Width (mm) | 1789 | 1881 |
| Height (mm) | 1561 | 1627 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2595 | 2984 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 1410 | 2084 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | 47 | — |
| Exterior Colors | — | Shadow Black, Star White, Velocity Blue Metallic, Glacier Gray, Grabber Yellow |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | MacPherson with Coil Spring | MacPherson Strut w/Coil Spring |
| Rear Suspension | Multi-Link | Multi-link with Coil Spring |
| Front Wheels | 18" alloy | 19 |
| Rear Wheels | 18' alloy | 19 |
| Front Tires | 225/45 R18 | 225/55R19 |
| Rear Tires | 225/45 R18 | 225/55R19 |
| Front Brakes | disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | disc | Disc |
| Steering Type | Electronic | EPS |
| Steering Column | tilt and telescopic | Tilt & Telescope |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | Yes |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | No | Yes |
| Brake Assist | No | Yes |
| Parking Sensors | Yes | Yes |
| Stability Control | No | Yes |
| Traction Control | Yes | Yes |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | No | Yes |
| Hill Descent Control | No | Yes |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Front Curtain Airbags | Yes | Yes |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | Yes | Yes |
| Engine Immobilizer | Yes | Yes |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Rear Side Airbags | — | Yes |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Automatic aircon | Automatic Climate Control Dual Zone |
| Rear A/C Vents | No | Yes |
| Seat Material | combination of clothe and leather | Leather |
| Parking Brake | Manual | EPB |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | Yes | Yes |
| Cruise Control | Yes | Yes |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | Yes | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | Yes |
| Auto Headlights | Yes | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | No | Yes |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | Yes |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 6 | 9 |
| Touchscreen | No | Yes |
| Navigation | No | No |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | No | Yes |
| Android Auto | Yes | Yes |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| AUX Input | Yes | No |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | No |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | No |
| iPod Support | Yes | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | bi-xenon | LED |
| Fog Lights | Yes | No |
| Daytime Running Lights | Yes | Yes |
Mini Countryman S 1.6 AT (2015) vs Ford Mustang Mach-E Premium AWD (2026): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer weighing cost, performance and practicality, the Mini Countryman S 1.6 AT (2015) and the Ford Mustang Mach‑E Premium AWD (2026) serve very different needs. The Mini costs ₱3,050,000, about ₱449,000 less than the Mach‑E, and its turbo‑charged 1.6‑L inline‑four delivers 184 PS and 240 Nm, propelling it from 0‑100 km/h in 7.9 seconds with a top speed of 210 km/h. It is a compact crossover (segment J) with front‑wheel drive, making it easier to maneuver in tight city streets and cheaper to insure. However, it is discontinued, carries an unlimited/2‑year warranty, and lacks modern EV benefits. The Mustang Mach‑E, priced at ₱3,499,000, is a current‑model midsize crossover SUV with all‑wheel drive, a powerful 394 PS electric motor, and 676 Nm of torque, offering brisk acceleration and zero‑emission driving. Its larger dimensions (4713 mm L × 1881 mm W × 1627 mm H) provide more interior space and a 2+3 seating layout, better for families or cargo. It also comes with a 3‑year/100,000 km warranty. Choose the Mini if you need a lower‑priced, sporty compact for city use and don’t mind an older, discontinued model. Opt for the Mustang Mach‑E if you want modern EV technology, higher power, AWD traction and extra space, and are willing to pay the premium.
Frequently asked questions
Which model is cheaper?
The Mini Countryman S 1.6 AT (2015) is priced at ₱3,050,000, which is ₱449,000 less than the Ford Mustang Mach‑E Premium AWD (2026) priced at ₱3,499,000.
Which vehicle has more power?
The Mustang Mach‑E Premium AWD produces 394 PS, nearly double the Mini Countryman’s 184 PS, and also delivers significantly higher torque (676 Nm vs 240 Nm).
Is the Mini still available?
The Mini Countryman S 2015 is listed as discontinued, meaning new units are no longer sold, whereas the Mustang Mach‑E is a current‑model vehicle.
Which car is better for daily commuting in the Philippines?
The Mini’s smaller size, front‑wheel drive and lower price make it easier for city driving and parking, while the Mach‑E offers more interior space, all‑wheel drive and zero‑emission operation, which may suit commuters seeking modern EV benefits despite a higher cost.