Mitsubishi Adventure 2.5 Super Sport MT (2015) vs Mitsubishi Lancer EX 1.6L GLS MT (2016)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Mitsubishi Adventure 2.5 Super Sport MT (2015) vs Mitsubishi Lancer EX 1.6L GLS MT (2016) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Mitsubishi Adventure 2.5 Super Sport MT (2015) Mitsubishi ₱1,010,000 | Mitsubishi Lancer EX 1.6L GLS MT (2016) Mitsubishi ₱928,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2015 | 2016 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 100,000km/3-years |
| Availability | Discontinued | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 2477cc | 1590cc |
| Valvetrain | SOHC 8valve | DOHC 16-valve |
| Compression Ratio | 21.1 | 11 : 1 |
| Aspiration | Naturally Aspirated | Naturally Aspirated, MIVEC |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gas |
| Max Power | 75 PS @ 4200 rpm | 117 PS @ 6000 rpm |
| Max Torque | 149 Nm @ 2500 rpm | 154 Nm @ 4000 rpm |
| Transmission | 5-Speed M/T | 5-Speed M/T |
| Drivetrain | RWD | FWD |
| Performance & Economy | ||
| Emission Standard | Euro-2 | Euro-4 |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | AUV | Sedan |
| Segment | M | C |
| Construction | Body-on-frame | Unibody |
| Doors | 5 | 4 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3+2 | 5 |
| Length (mm) | 4640 | 4625 |
| Width (mm) | 1750 | 1760 |
| Height (mm) | 1830 | 1505 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2620 | 2635 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 1565 | 1200 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | 55 | 59 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | Independent Double Wishbone Suspension with Coil Spring | MacPherson Strut Coil Spring with Stabilizer Bar |
| Rear Suspension | Semi-Elliptic Leaf Spring | Multi-Link |
| Front Wheels | 15 x 6.0JJ Alloy | 16x6.5 |
| Rear Wheels | 15 x 6.0JJ Alloy | 16x6.5 |
| Front Tires | 195/65 R15 | 205/60 R16 |
| Rear Tires | 195/65 R15 | 205/60 R16 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Drum | Disc |
| Steering Type | Hydraulic | Hydraulic |
| Steering Column | tilt | tilt |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | No | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | No | Yes |
| Brake Assist | No | Yes |
| Parking Sensors | No | No |
| Stability Control | No | No |
| Traction Control | No | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | No | No |
| Hill Descent Control | No | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | No | Yes |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | No | Yes |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | No | Yes |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Manual Aircon | Automatic Climate Control |
| Rear A/C Vents | Yes | Yes |
| Seat Material | Leather | Fabric |
| Parking Brake | Manual | Manual |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless Operation System |
| Push-Button Start | No | No |
| Cruise Control | No | No |
| Multi-Info Display | No | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | Yes |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | No | No |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | Yes |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 6 | 4 |
| Touchscreen | Yes | Yes |
| Navigation | No | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | Yes | Yes |
| Android Auto | Yes | Yes |
| USB | No | Yes |
| AUX Input | No | Yes |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | Yes |
| DVD Player | Yes | Yes |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | Yes |
| iPod Support | Yes | Yes |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | Halogen | Halogen |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | Yes |
Mitsubishi Adventure 2.5 Super Sport MT (2015) vs Mitsubishi Lancer EX 1.6L GLS MT (2016): which should you buy?
For the Filipino buyer prioritizing on-road comfort, fuel efficiency in city traffic, and lower acquisition cost, the Mitsubishi Lancer EX 1.6L GLS MT is the superior choice. It is ₱82,000 cheaper, offers a more modern DOHC 16-valve engine with higher peak power (117 PS vs 75 PS), and sits lower to the ground in a unibody sedan body. Conversely, the Mitsubishi Adventure 2.5 Super Sport MT is the definitive pick for buyers needing serious off-road capability, towing potential, and a rugged presence. Its 2.5L diesel engine delivers strong low-end torque (149 Nm) and a body-on-frame construction with RWD, making it ideal for rough terrain or heavy loads, despite being more expensive and less efficient for daily commuting. The decision rests on whether the buyer values practicality and economy (Lancer EX) or durability and utility (Adventure).
Frequently asked questions
Which vehicle costs less?
The Mitsubishi Lancer EX 1.6L GLS MT is cheaper at ₱928,000 compared to the Mitsubishi Adventure 2.5 Super Sport MT which is priced at ₱1,010,000.
Which engine is more powerful?
The Lancer EX is more powerful, producing 117 PS @ 6000 rpm, whereas the Adventure generates only 75 PS @ 4200 rpm.
Which car is better for daily city commuting?
The Lancer EX is better for daily commuting due to its smaller 1590cc displacement, 4-door unibody body, and Euro-4 emission standard, while the Adventure is a 5-door AUV with a larger 2477cc diesel engine.
Which vehicle is better for off-roading or heavy loads?
The Mitsubishi Adventure is better for off-roading and heavy loads because it features a body-on-frame construction, RWD drivetrain, and a 2.5L diesel engine with higher torque (149 Nm) compared to the Lancer EX's FWD unibody setup.