Mitsubishi Pajero GLS 3.2 DI-D 4WD AT (2015) vs Hyundai IONIQ 5 GL 2WD Standard Range (2026)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Mitsubishi Pajero GLS 3.2 DI-D 4WD AT (2015) vs Hyundai IONIQ 5 GL 2WD Standard Range (2026) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Mitsubishi Pajero GLS 3.2 DI-D 4WD AT (2015) Mitsubishi ₱2,842,000 | Hyundai IONIQ 5 GL 2WD Standard Range (2026) Hyundai ₱2,840,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2015 | 2026 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 5-years/200,000km |
| Availability | Current | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | V6 | Electric Motor |
| Displacement | 3200cc | — |
| Valvetrain | SOHC 24valve | — |
| Compression Ratio | 17:1 | — |
| Aspiration | Turbo CRDi, MIVEC | — |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Electric |
| Max Power | 192 PS @ 3800 rpm | 168 PS |
| Max Torque | 441 Nm @ 2000 rpm | 350 Nm |
| Transmission | 5-Speed A/T | Automatic |
| Drivetrain | 4WD | RWD |
| Performance & Economy | ||
| Emission Standard | Euro-4 | — |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | SUV | Midsize Crossover SUV |
| Segment | J | Crossover |
| Construction | Body-on-frame | Unibody |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seating Capacity | 7 | 2+3 |
| Length (mm) | 4900 | 4655 |
| Width (mm) | 1875 | 1815 |
| Height (mm) | 1870 | 1605 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2780 | 3000 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 2765 | 1855 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | 88 | — |
| Exterior Colors | — | Lucid Blue, Abyss Black, Atlas White, Cyber Gray, Digital Teal, Gravity Gold, Matte Gold, Shooting Star Matte Gray |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | Double Wishbone Coil Springs with Stabilizer Bars | MacPherson Strut w/Coil Spring |
| Rear Suspension | Mulit-Link Coil Springs with Stabilizer Bars | Multi-Link w/ Coil Spring |
| Front Wheels | 18x7.5 | 19 |
| Rear Wheels | 18x7.5 | 19 |
| Front Tires | 265/60 R18 | 235/55R19 |
| Rear Tires | 265/60 R18 | 235/55R19 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Steering Type | Hydraulic | EPS |
| Steering Column | tilt | Tilt & Telescope |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | Yes | Yes |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Rear Brakes | — | Disc |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | No | Yes |
| Parking Sensors | Yes | Yes |
| Stability Control | Yes | Yes |
| Traction Control | Yes | Yes |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | — |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | No | Yes |
| Hill Descent Control | No | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Front Curtain Airbags | Yes | Yes |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | Yes | Yes |
| Rear Side Airbags | Yes | Yes |
| Engine Immobilizer | Yes | Yes |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Fully Automatic | Automatic Climate Control |
| Rear A/C Vents | Yes | Yes |
| Seat Material | Leather | Fabric |
| Parking Brake | Manual | EPB |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | No | Yes |
| Cruise Control | Yes | Yes |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | Yes | Yes |
| Auto Headlights | Yes | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | Yes | Yes |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | no |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 6 | 6 |
| Touchscreen | Yes | Yes |
| Navigation | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | Yes | Yes |
| Android Auto | Yes | Yes |
| USB | Yes | No |
| AUX Input | Yes | No |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | No |
| DVD Player | Yes | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | No |
| iPod Support | Yes | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | HID | LED |
| Fog Lights | Yes | No |
| Daytime Running Lights | Yes | Yes |
Mitsubishi Pajero GLS 3.2 DI-D 4WD AT (2015) vs Hyundai IONIQ 5 GL 2WD Standard Range (2026): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer choosing between the Mitsubishi Pajero GLS 3.2 DI-D 4WD AT (2015) and the Hyundai IONIQ 5 GL 2WD Standard Range (2026), the decision hinges on lifestyle and priorities. The Pajero, at ₱2,842,000, is a body-on-frame SUV with a 3.2L turbo-diesel V6 producing 192 PS and 441 Nm, paired with a 5-speed automatic and full-time 4WD. It excels in off-road capability and towing, but its 2015 model year means older tech and a shorter 3-year/100,000-km warranty. The IONIQ 5, at ₱2,840,000 (nearly identical price), is a 2026 electric midsize crossover with 168 PS and 350 Nm, rear-wheel drive, and a longer 5-year/200,000-km warranty. It offers modern features, lower running costs (electric vs diesel), and zero emissions, ideal for daily commuting and city driving. The Pajero scores for off-road enthusiasts or those needing ruggedness; the IONIQ 5 wins for tech-savvy buyers prioritizing efficiency, warranty, and on-road comfort. Both are similarly priced, but the IONIQ 5 is more future-proof.
Frequently asked questions
Which vehicle is cheaper?
Both are almost identically priced: the Mitsubishi Pajero GLS 3.2 DI-D 4WD AT (2015) at ₱2,842,000 and the Hyundai IONIQ 5 GL 2WD Standard Range (2026) at ₱2,840,000, a difference of only ₱2,000.
Which is more powerful?
The Pajero has higher max torque (441 Nm vs 350 Nm) and slightly more peak power (192 PS vs 168 PS), but the IONIQ 5's electric motor delivers instant torque, making it feel quicker off the line.
Which is better for daily commuting?
The Hyundai IONIQ 5 is better for daily commuting due to its electric powertrain (lower fuel and maintenance costs), modern features, and longer 5-year warranty. The Pajero's diesel engine is costlier to run in stop-and-go traffic.
Which is better for off-road or long trips?
The Mitsubishi Pajero is far better for off-road and long trips thanks to its body-on-frame construction, full-time 4WD, and diesel engine with high torque. The IONIQ 5 is a unibody crossover with RWD, not designed for rough terrain.