Nissan Navara 2.5L 4×4 EL 6MT (2015) vs Mitsubishi ASX GLS (2017)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Nissan Navara 2.5L 4×4 EL 6MT (2015) vs Mitsubishi ASX GLS (2017) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Nissan Navara 2.5L 4×4 EL 6MT (2015) Nissan ₱1,322,000 | Mitsubishi ASX GLS (2017) Mitsubishi ₱1,215,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2015 | 2017 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 100,000 km/3-years |
| Availability | Discontinued | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 2488cc | 1998cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-valve | DOHC 16-valve |
| Compression Ratio | 15.0:1 | — |
| Aspiration | Turbo Intercooled VGT DI | Naturally Aspirated MIVEC |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gas |
| Max Power | 163 PS @ 3600 rpm | 150 PS @ 6000 rpm |
| Max Torque | 403 Nm @ 2000 rpm | 197 Nm @ 4200 rpm |
| Transmission | 6-Speed M/T | CVT |
| Drivetrain | 4WD | FWD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Pickup | Crossover |
| Segment | Pickup | J |
| Construction | Body-on-frame | Unibody |
| Doors | 4 | 5 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3 | 5 |
| Length (mm) | 5255 | 4295 |
| Width (mm) | 1850 | 1770 |
| Height (mm) | 1810 | 1625 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 3150 | 2670 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 1902 | 1350 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | 80 | 63 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | Independent Double-Wishbone with Coil Spring and Stabilizer Bar | MacPherson Strut Coil Spring with Stabilizer |
| Rear Suspension | Rigid 5-Link with Stabilizer Bar | Multi-Link Coil Spring with Stabilizer |
| Front Wheels | 16 | 17x6.5 |
| Rear Wheels | 16 | 17x6.5 |
| Front Tires | 255/70R16 | 215/60 R17 |
| Rear Tires | 255/70R16 | 215/60 R17 |
| Rear Brakes | Drum | Disc |
| Steering Type | Power Steering | Electronic |
| Steering Column | Manual Tilt | tilt and telescopic |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | Yes |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Front Brakes | — | Disc |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | Yes | Yes |
| Parking Sensors | No | Yes |
| Stability Control | Yes | No |
| Traction Control | Yes | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | Yes | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | Yes | No |
| Hill Descent Control | Yes | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | Yes | Yes |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Manual, Push Type | Automatic Climate Control |
| Rear A/C Vents | Yes | Yes |
| Seat Material | Zero-Gravity Seats, Fabric | Leather |
| Parking Brake | Manual | Manual |
| Key Type | Manual | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | No | Yes |
| Cruise Control | No | Yes |
| Multi-Info Display | No | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | Yes |
| Reverse Camera | No | Yes |
| Auto Headlights | No | Yes |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | No | No |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 6 | 6 |
| Touchscreen | No | Yes |
| Navigation | No | Yes |
| Bluetooth | No | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | No | Yes |
| Android Auto | No | Yes |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| AUX Input | Yes | Yes |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | Yes |
| DVD Player | No | Yes |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | Yes |
| iPod Support | Yes | Yes |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | Halogen | HID |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | Yes |
| Performance & Economy | ||
| Emission Standard | — | Euro-4 |
Nissan Navara 2.5L 4×4 EL 6MT (2015) vs Mitsubishi ASX GLS (2017): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer prioritizing utility, the 2015 Nissan Navara 2.5L 4×4 EL 6MT is the superior choice. Its body-on-frame construction and 4WD drivetrain make it ideal for off-roading, hauling, or rough terrain where the Mitsubishi ASX GLS cannot compete. While the Navara costs ₱107,000 more, its turbocharged diesel engine delivers significantly more power (163 PS vs 150 PS) and torque (403 Nm vs 197 Nm), offering superior performance in challenging conditions. Conversely, the 2017 Mitsubishi ASX GLS is the logical pick for daily commuters seeking a cheaper, more comfortable ride with 5 doors and a CVT transmission. If you prioritize fuel economy and city driving over rugged capability, the naturally aspirated gas engine of the ASX provides a smoother, lower-cost alternative, despite its lower power output.
Frequently asked questions
Which vehicle is cheaper?
The 2017 Mitsubishi ASX GLS is cheaper at ₱1,215,000 compared to the 2015 Nissan Navara 2.5L 4×4 EL 6MT, which costs ₱1,322,000.
Which engine is more powerful?
The Nissan Navara is more powerful with 163 PS of max power and 403 Nm of max torque, whereas the Mitsubishi ASX produces 150 PS and 197 Nm.
Which vehicle is better for off-roading?
The Nissan Navara is better for off-roading due to its 4WD drivetrain and body-on-frame construction, while the Mitsubishi ASX has a FWD drivetrain and unibody construction.
Which is more practical for daily commuting?
The Mitsubishi ASX GLS is more practical for daily commuting with its 5-door design and CVT transmission, while the Navara is a 4-door pickup with a 6-speed manual transmission.