Suzuki APV Type II GA MT (2015) vs Mitsubishi Mirage 1.2 GLX CVT (2016)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Suzuki APV Type II GA MT (2015) vs Mitsubishi Mirage 1.2 GLX CVT (2016) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Suzuki APV Type II GA MT (2015) Suzuki ₱588,000 | Mitsubishi Mirage 1.2 GLX CVT (2016) Mitsubishi ₱688,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2015 | 2016 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 100,000km/3-years |
| Availability | Current | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-3 |
| Displacement | 1590cc | 1193cc |
| Valvetrain | SOHC 16-valve | DOHC 12-valve |
| Aspiration | Naturally Aspirated | Naturally Aspirated |
| Fuel Type | Gas | Gas |
| Max Power | 91 PS @ 5750 rpm | 78 PS @ 6000 rpm |
| Max Torque | 127 Nm @ 4500 rpm | 100 Nm @ 4000 rpm |
| Transmission | 5-Speed M/T | INVECS-III CVT |
| Drivetrain | RWD | FWD |
| Compression Ratio | — | 10.5 : 1 |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | MPV | Hatchback |
| Segment | M | B |
| Construction | Body-on-frame | Unibody |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seating Capacity | 3+3+2 | 5 |
| Length (mm) | 4155 | 3795 |
| Width (mm) | 1655 | 1665 |
| Height (mm) | 1865 | 1500 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2625 | 2450 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 1210 | 845 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | 46 | 35 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | MacPherson Strut w/ Coil Spring | MacPherson Strut Coil Spring |
| Rear Suspension | Rigid Axle, Leaf Springs | Torsion Beam |
| Front Wheels | 14" Alloy | 14x4.5 |
| Rear Wheels | 14" Alloy | 14x4.5 |
| Front Tires | 185/60 R14 | 165/65 R14 |
| Rear Tires | 185/60 R14 | 165/65 R14 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Drum | Drum |
| Steering Column | tilt | tilt |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Steering Type | — | Electronic |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | No | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | No | Yes |
| Brake Assist | No | No |
| Parking Sensors | No | No |
| Stability Control | No | No |
| Traction Control | No | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | No | No |
| Hill Descent Control | No | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | No | Yes |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | No | Yes |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | No | No |
| Security Alarm | No | Yes |
| Door Locking | Standard | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Manual Aircon | Manual Aircon |
| Rear A/C Vents | No | Yes |
| Seat Material | Fabric | Fabric |
| Parking Brake | Manual | Manual |
| Key Type | Standard Key | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | No | No |
| Cruise Control | No | No |
| Multi-Info Display | No | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | No |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | No | Yes |
| Power Seats | No | No |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | Yes |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 2 | 4 |
| Touchscreen | No | Yes |
| Navigation | No | No |
| Bluetooth | No | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | No | Yes |
| Android Auto | No | Yes |
| USB | No | Yes |
| AUX Input | No | Yes |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | Yes |
| DVD Player | No | Yes |
| MP3 Playback | No | Yes |
| iPod Support | No | Yes |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | Halogen | Halogen |
| Fog Lights | No | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | No |
| Performance & Economy | ||
| Emission Standard | — | Euro-4 |
Suzuki APV Type II GA MT (2015) vs Mitsubishi Mirage 1.2 GLX CVT (2016): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer prioritizing raw power and towing capability, the 2015 Suzuki APV Type II GA MT is the superior choice despite its lower price tag. It offers a 1590cc engine producing 91 PS, significantly outperforming the Mirage's 1193cc 78 PS unit, while its RWD layout and body-on-frame construction suggest better durability for off-road or heavy loads. Conversely, the 2016 Mitsubishi Mirage 1.2 GLX CVT wins on value, offering a newer model year and a more affordable price of ₱688,000 versus the APV's ₱588,000. The Mirage's unibody chassis and CVT transmission provide smoother city driving with Euro-4 emissions, making it ideal for urban commuters who prioritize fuel economy and lower entry cost over brute power. Ultimately, choose the APV for capability and the Mirage for economy and comfort.
Frequently asked questions
Which vehicle is cheaper?
The 2015 Suzuki APV Type II GA MT is cheaper at ₱588,000 compared to the 2016 Mitsubishi Mirage 1.2 GLX CVT which costs ₱688,000.
Which car has more power?
The Suzuki APV is more powerful with a 1590cc engine generating 91 PS, whereas the Mitsubishi Mirage has a smaller 1193cc engine producing only 78 PS.
Which one is better for daily commuting in Manila?
The Mitsubishi Mirage is generally better for daily commuting due to its unibody construction, CVT transmission for smoothness, and Euro-4 emission standard suited for city traffic.
What are the main differences in drivetrain and capacity?
The Suzuki APV features a RWD layout with a 5-speed manual transmission and seats 5 people (3+3+2), while the Mitsubishi Mirage uses a FWD layout with a CVT and seats 5 people in a hatchback body style.