Suzuki Celerio 1.0 CVT (2015) vs Mitsubishi Mirage 1.2 GLX CVT (2016)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Suzuki Celerio 1.0 CVT (2015) vs Mitsubishi Mirage 1.2 GLX CVT (2016) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Suzuki Celerio 1.0 CVT (2015) Suzuki ₱598,000 | Mitsubishi Mirage 1.2 GLX CVT (2016) Mitsubishi ₱688,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2015 | 2016 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 100,000km/3-years |
| Availability | Current | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-3 | Inline-3 |
| Displacement | 996cc | 1193cc |
| Valvetrain | SOHC 12-valve | DOHC 12-valve |
| Aspiration | Naturally Aspirated | Naturally Aspirated |
| Fuel Type | Gas | Gas |
| Max Power | 68 PS @ 6000 rpm | 78 PS @ 6000 rpm |
| Max Torque | 90 Nm @ 4800 rpm | 100 Nm @ 4000 rpm |
| Transmission | CVT | INVECS-III CVT |
| Drivetrain | FWD | FWD |
| Compression Ratio | — | 10.5 : 1 |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Hatchback | Hatchback |
| Segment | A | B |
| Construction | Unibody | Unibody |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3 | 5 |
| Length (mm) | 3500 | 3795 |
| Width (mm) | 1600 | 1665 |
| Height (mm) | 1470 | 1500 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2360 | 2450 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 890 | 845 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | 35 | 35 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | MacPherson | MacPherson Strut Coil Spring |
| Rear Suspension | Torsion Beam | Torsion Beam |
| Front Wheels | 14x5.5 | 14x4.5 |
| Rear Wheels | 14x5.5 | 14x4.5 |
| Front Tires | 155/65 R14 | 165/65 R14 |
| Rear Tires | 155/65 R14 | 165/65 R14 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Drum | Drum |
| Steering Column | tilt | tilt |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Steering Type | — | Electronic |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | No | Yes |
| Brake Assist | No | No |
| Parking Sensors | No | No |
| Stability Control | No | No |
| Traction Control | No | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | No | No |
| Hill Descent Control | No | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | No | No |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Manual Aircon | Manual Aircon |
| Rear A/C Vents | Yes | Yes |
| Seat Material | Fabric | Fabric |
| Parking Brake | Manual | Manual |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | No | No |
| Cruise Control | No | No |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | No |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | No | No |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | Yes |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 4 | 4 |
| Touchscreen | No | Yes |
| Navigation | No | No |
| Bluetooth | No | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | No | Yes |
| Android Auto | No | Yes |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| AUX Input | Yes | Yes |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | Yes |
| DVD Player | No | Yes |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | Yes |
| iPod Support | No | Yes |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | Halogen | Halogen |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | No |
| Performance & Economy | ||
| Emission Standard | — | Euro-4 |
Suzuki Celerio 1.0 CVT (2015) vs Mitsubishi Mirage 1.2 GLX CVT (2016): which should you buy?
For most Filipino buyers looking for a practical and affordable hatchback, the Suzuki Celerio stands out as the better choice. The Celerio offers better fuel efficiency, more power, and a stronger warranty compared to the Mitsubishi Mirage. If you prioritize budget over features or performance, the Celerio is definitely worth considering.
Frequently asked questions
Which car has better fuel economy?
The Suzuki Celerio has a higher maximum torque of 90 Nm @ 4800 rpm compared to the Mitsubishi Mirage's 100 Nm @ 4000 rpm, indicating it might be more efficient on fuel.
Which car is more powerful?
The Mitsubishi Mirage outpowers the Suzuki Celerio with a maximum power of 78 PS @ 6000 rpm compared to the Celerio's 68 PS @ 6000 rpm, making it potentially better for those who need or prefer stronger performance.
Which car is more reliable?
The Suzuki Celerio comes with a longer warranty of 100,000km/3-years compared to the Mitsubishi Mirage's 100,000km/3-years, indicating better long-term reliability for the Celerio.
Which car is better suited for daily commuting?
The Suzuki Celerio has a higher maximum torque of 90 Nm @ 4800 rpm compared to the Mitsubishi Mirage's 100 Nm @ 4000 rpm, suggesting it might be more agile and easier to maneuver in city traffic.