Suzuki Ertiga GL (2015) vs Ferrari California T Convertible V8 Dual Clutch A/T (2016)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Suzuki Ertiga GL (2015) vs Ferrari California T Convertible V8 Dual Clutch A/T (2016) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Suzuki Ertiga GL (2015) Suzuki ₱712,000 | Ferrari California T Convertible V8 Dual Clutch A/T (2016) Ferrari |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2015 | 2016 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 100,000km/3-years |
| Availability | Discontinued | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | 90-degree V8 |
| Displacement | 1373cc | 3855cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-valve with VVT | DOHC 32-Valve |
| Aspiration | Naturally Aspirated | Twin Turbo |
| Fuel Type | Gas | Gas |
| Max Power | 98 PS @ 6000 rpm | 412 kW @ 7500 rpm |
| Max Torque | 130 Nm @ 4000 rpm | 755 Nm @ 4750 rpm |
| Transmission | 5-Speed M/T | 7-Speed Dual Clutch A/T |
| Drivetrain | FWD | RWD |
| Compression Ratio | — | 9.4:01 |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | MPV | Convertible |
| Segment | M | S |
| Construction | Body On Frame | Unibody |
| Doors | 5 | 2 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+2+3 | 2+2 |
| Length (mm) | 4265 | 4570 |
| Width (mm) | 1695 | 1910 |
| Height (mm) | 1685 | 1322 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2740 | 2670 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 1180 | 1730 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | — | 78 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | MacPherson with Coil Spring | Double Wishbone |
| Rear Suspension | Torsion Beam w/ Coil Spring | Multi-Link |
| Front Wheels | 15 Alloy | 20" Aluminum |
| Rear Wheels | 15 Alloy | 20" Aluminum |
| Front Tires | 185/65 R15 | 245/40 ZR19 |
| Rear Tires | 185/65 R15 | 285/40 ZR19 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Steering Type | electronic | Electric Assist |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | Yes |
| Differential Lock | No | Yes |
| Steering Column | — | Telescopic |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | No | Yes |
| Parking Sensors | No | Yes |
| Stability Control | No | Yes |
| Traction Control | No | Yes |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | Yes |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | No | No |
| Hill Descent Control | No | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | No | Yes |
| Knee Airbag | No | Yes |
| Passenger Airbag | No | Yes |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | Yes | No |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Automatic Air Conditioning | Auto Climate Control System |
| Rear A/C Vents | No | No |
| Seat Material | Fabric | Optional |
| Parking Brake | Manual | EPB |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | No | Yes |
| Cruise Control | No | Yes |
| Multi-Info Display | No | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | Yes |
| Reverse Camera | No | Yes |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | No | Yes |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | no |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 4-Speakers | — |
| Touchscreen | No | Yes |
| Navigation | No | No |
| Bluetooth | No | No |
| Apple CarPlay | No | No |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| AUX Input | No | Yes |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | Yes |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | Yes |
| iPod Support | No | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | Halogen | HID |
| Fog Lights | Yes | No |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | Yes |
| Performance & Economy | ||
| 0–100 km/h | — | 3.6 seconds |
| Top Speed | — | 316 km/h |
Suzuki Ertiga GL (2015) vs Ferrari California T Convertible V8 Dual Clutch A/T (2016): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer looking for practicality and affordability, the Suzuki Ertiga GL is the clear winner. It offers a more suitable price point of ₱712,000 compared to Ferrari's luxury convertible priced at ₱15,899,999. The Ertiga’s naturally aspirated engine delivers decent power and torque for daily commuting needs. Its 5-speed manual transmission is practical for those who prefer driving experience over automatic convenience. For buyers seeking a high-performance sports car with advanced features like dual clutch transmission and top speed of 316 km/h, the Ferrari California T Convertible V8 is an excellent choice. It's ideal for those looking to impress at parties or enjoy thrilling drives on winding roads.
Frequently asked questions
Which vehicle is cheaper?
The Suzuki Ertiga GL costs ₱712,000 compared to the Ferrari California T Convertible V8 which starts at ₱15,899,999.
Which vehicle has better fuel efficiency?
Both vehicles use gasoline as their primary fuel type but do not provide specific fuel economy data. The Ertiga's naturally aspirated engine is less powerful than the Ferrari’s turbocharged V8, which could potentially offer better fuel efficiency in city driving conditions.
Which vehicle is more suitable for daily commuting?
The Suzuki Ertiga GL would be a better choice for daily commuting due to its lower price and manual transmission that suits manual driving preferences. The Ferrari's powerful engine might not provide the smoothest ride or fuel economy needed for regular use.
Which vehicle has better acceleration performance?
The Ferrari California T Convertible V8 with its twin turbocharged V8 engine can accelerate from 0 to 100 km/h in just 3.6 seconds, showcasing superior performance compared to the Ertiga's naturally aspirated inline-4 engine.