Suzuki Ertiga GL (2015) vs Suzuki Ertiga GA (2016)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Suzuki Ertiga GL (2015) vs Suzuki Ertiga GA (2016) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Suzuki Ertiga GL (2015) Suzuki ₱712,000 | Suzuki Ertiga GA (2016) Suzuki ₱699,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2015 | 2016 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 100,000km/3-years |
| Availability | Discontinued | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 1373cc | 1373cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-valve with VVT | DOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Naturally Aspirated | Fuel Injection |
| Fuel Type | Gas | Gas |
| Max Power | 98 PS @ 6000 rpm | 96 PS @ 6000 rpm |
| Max Torque | 130 Nm @ 4000 rpm | 130 Nm @ 4000 rpm |
| Transmission | 5-Speed M/T | 5-Speed M/T |
| Drivetrain | FWD | FWD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | MPV | MPV |
| Segment | M | M |
| Construction | Body On Frame | Unibody |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+2+3 | 2+2+3 |
| Length (mm) | 4265 | 4265 |
| Width (mm) | 1695 | 1695 |
| Height (mm) | 1685 | 1985 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2740 | 2740 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 1180 | 1155 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | — | 45 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | MacPherson with Coil Spring | MacPherson Strut with Coil Spring |
| Rear Suspension | Torsion Beam w/ Coil Spring | Torsion Beam w/ Coil Spring |
| Front Wheels | 15 Alloy | 15'' Steel |
| Rear Wheels | 15 Alloy | 15'' Steel |
| Front Tires | 185/65 R15 | 185/65 R15 |
| Rear Tires | 185/65 R15 | 185/65 R15 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Disc | Drum |
| Steering Type | electronic | EPS |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Steering Column | — | tilt + tele |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | No |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | No |
| Brake Assist | No | No |
| Parking Sensors | No | No |
| Stability Control | No | No |
| Traction Control | No | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | No | No |
| Hill Descent Control | No | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | No | Yes |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | No | Yes |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | Yes | No |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Automatic Air Conditioning | Manual Aircon |
| Rear A/C Vents | No | Yes |
| Seat Material | Fabric | Fabric |
| Parking Brake | Manual | Manual |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Standard Key |
| Push-Button Start | No | No |
| Cruise Control | No | No |
| Multi-Info Display | No | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | No |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | No |
| Power Seats | No | No |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 4-Speakers | 2 |
| Touchscreen | No | No |
| Navigation | No | No |
| Bluetooth | No | No |
| Apple CarPlay | No | No |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| AUX Input | No | Yes |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | Yes |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | Yes |
| iPod Support | No | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | Halogen | Halogen |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | No |
Suzuki Ertiga GL (2015) vs Suzuki Ertiga GA (2016): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer weighing cost, power and future serviceability, the 2016 Suzuki Ertiga GA is the more sensible pick. It is priced lower at ₱699,000 versus the 2015 Ertiga GL’s ₱712,000, saving you ₱13,000 right off the bat. While the GL edges out a modest 2 PS advantage (98 PS vs 96 PS), the GA’s fuel‑injection system generally offers better fuel efficiency and smoother throttle response than the GL’s naturally‑aspirated setup. The GA also adopts a modern unibody construction, which typically translates to lighter weight, improved ride comfort and lower cabin noise compared with the GL’s older body‑on‑frame design. Importantly, the GA is still in current production, meaning spare parts and dealer support will be easier to obtain, whereas the GL has been discontinued. Both share the same 1.4‑L inline‑four engine, 5‑speed manual gearbox, FWD layout and seating layout (2+2+3), so day‑to‑day practicality is identical. If you prioritize the newest spec, lower price and better long‑term serviceability, go for the 2016 Ertiga GA. Choose the 2015 GL only if you specifically need the slight power bump and are comfortable sourcing parts for a discontinued model.
Frequently asked questions
Which model is cheaper?
The 2016 Suzuki Ertiga GA costs ₱699,000, which is ₱13,000 less than the 2015 Ertiga GL priced at ₱712,000.
Which model has more power?
The 2015 Ertiga GL produces 98 PS, slightly higher than the 2016 Ertiga GA’s 96 PS.
Is there a difference in engine technology?
Yes. The GL uses a naturally aspirated engine, while the GA is equipped with fuel injection, which generally improves fuel efficiency and throttle response.
Which model is better for long‑term ownership?
The GA is better for long‑term ownership because it is still in current production, has a unibody construction, and will have easier access to parts and dealer support, whereas the GL is discontinued.