Suzuki Ertiga GL (2015) vs BYD F0 1.0 G-I AMT (2017)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Suzuki Ertiga GL (2015) vs BYD F0 1.0 G-I AMT (2017) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Suzuki Ertiga GL (2015) Suzuki ₱712,000 | BYD F0 1.0 G-I AMT (2017) BYD ₱598,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2015 | 2017 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 100,000 km/5-years |
| Availability | Discontinued | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-3 |
| Displacement | 1373cc | 999cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-valve with VVT | DOHC 12-valve |
| Aspiration | Naturally Aspirated | Naturally Aspirated |
| Fuel Type | Gas | Gas |
| Max Power | 98 PS @ 6000 rpm | 68 PS @ 6000 rpm |
| Max Torque | 130 Nm @ 4000 rpm | 90 Nm @ 4000-4500 rpm |
| Transmission | 5-Speed M/T | 5-Speed AMT |
| Drivetrain | FWD | FWD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | MPV | Hatchback |
| Segment | M | B |
| Construction | Body On Frame | Unibody |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+2+3 | 2+3 |
| Length (mm) | 4265 | 3460 |
| Width (mm) | 1695 | 1618 |
| Height (mm) | 1685 | 1465 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2740 | 2340 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 1180 | — |
| Fuel Tank (L) | — | 30 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | MacPherson with Coil Spring | MacPherson Independent |
| Rear Suspension | Torsion Beam w/ Coil Spring | Torsion Beam |
| Front Wheels | 15 Alloy | 14 Alloy Rim |
| Rear Wheels | 15 Alloy | 14 Alloy Rim |
| Front Tires | 185/65 R15 | 165/60 R14 |
| Rear Tires | 185/65 R15 | 165/60 R14 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Disc | Drum |
| Steering Type | electronic | Hydraulic |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Steering Column | — | tilt |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | No | No |
| Parking Sensors | No | No |
| Stability Control | No | No |
| Traction Control | No | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | No | No |
| Hill Descent Control | No | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | No | No |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | No | No |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | Yes | No |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Automatic Air Conditioning | Manual Aircon |
| Rear A/C Vents | No | No |
| Seat Material | Fabric | Fabric |
| Parking Brake | Manual | Manual |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Smart Entry |
| Push-Button Start | No | Yes |
| Cruise Control | No | No |
| Multi-Info Display | No | No |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | No |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | No | No |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 4-Speakers | 2 |
| Touchscreen | No | No |
| Navigation | No | No |
| Bluetooth | No | No |
| Apple CarPlay | No | No |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | No |
| AUX Input | No | Yes |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | Yes |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | Yes |
| iPod Support | No | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | Halogen | Halogen |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | No |
Suzuki Ertiga GL (2015) vs BYD F0 1.0 G-I AMT (2017): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer prioritizing raw power and long-term resale value, the 2015 Suzuki Ertiga GL is the superior choice despite its higher price tag. At ₱712,000, it offers a 1373cc inline-4 engine producing 98 PS, significantly outperforming the BYD F0's 999cc inline-3 which only generates 68 PS. The Ertiga's 5-door MPV layout provides 2+2+3 seating, making it more practical for families than the BYD's 5-door hatchback with 2+3 seating. Conversely, the BYD F0 1.0 G-I AMT is the clear winner for budget-conscious buyers seeking the lowest entry point at ₱598,000. However, the BYD's shorter warranty period (100,000km/3-years) compared to the Ertiga's 100,000km/5-years and its smaller 3460mm length suggest it is best suited for solo commuters or those strictly limited by budget, while the Ertiga is ideal for families needing space and better engine performance.
Frequently asked questions
Which vehicle costs less?
The BYD F0 1.0 G-I AMT is cheaper at ₱598,000 compared to the Suzuki Ertiga GL which costs ₱712,000.
Which engine produces more power?
The Suzuki Ertiga GL is more powerful with 98 PS, whereas the BYD F0 produces only 68 PS.
Which car is better for a family with children?
The Suzuki Ertiga GL is better for families as it has 5 doors and a 2+2+3 seating arrangement, while the BYD F0 only seats 2+3 passengers.
Which vehicle has a longer warranty?
The Suzuki Ertiga GL offers a longer warranty of 100,000km/3-years compared to the BYD F0 which has a 100,000km/5-year warranty.