Suzuki Ertiga GL (2015) vs Porsche 718 Cayman S (2017)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Suzuki Ertiga GL (2015) vs Porsche 718 Cayman S (2017) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Suzuki Ertiga GL (2015) Suzuki ₱712,000 | Porsche 718 Cayman S (2017) Porsche |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2015 | 2017 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | Unlimited/2-years |
| Availability | Discontinued | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Flat-4 |
| Displacement | 1373cc | 2497cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-valve with VVT | DOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Naturally Aspirated | Turbocharged |
| Fuel Type | Gas | Gas |
| Max Power | 98 PS @ 6000 rpm | 350 PS @ 6500 rpm |
| Max Torque | 130 Nm @ 4000 rpm | 420 Nm @ 1900-4500 rpm |
| Transmission | 5-Speed M/T | 7-speed PDK |
| Drivetrain | FWD | RWD |
| Compression Ratio | — | 9.5:1 |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | MPV | Coupe |
| Segment | M | S |
| Construction | Body On Frame | Unibody |
| Doors | 5 | 2 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+2+3 | 2 |
| Length (mm) | 4265 | 4379 |
| Width (mm) | 1695 | 1994 |
| Height (mm) | 1685 | 1295 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2740 | 2475 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 1180 | 1385 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | — | 64 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | MacPherson with Coil Spring | Lightweight Spring-Strut |
| Rear Suspension | Torsion Beam w/ Coil Spring | Lightweight Spring-Strut |
| Front Wheels | 15 Alloy | 20" alloy |
| Rear Wheels | 15 Alloy | 20" alloy |
| Front Tires | 185/65 R15 | 235/35 ZR20 |
| Rear Tires | 185/65 R15 | 265/35 ZR20 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Steering Type | electronic | Electric Assist |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | Yes |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Steering Column | — | tilt and telescoping |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | No | Yes |
| Parking Sensors | No | Yes |
| Stability Control | No | Yes |
| Traction Control | No | Yes |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | Yes |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | No | Yes |
| Hill Descent Control | No | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | Yes |
| Driver Airbag | No | Yes |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | No | Yes |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | Yes |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | Yes |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | Yes |
| Engine Immobilizer | Yes | Yes |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Automatic Air Conditioning | Auto Climate Control |
| Rear A/C Vents | No | No |
| Seat Material | Fabric | Leather |
| Parking Brake | Manual | Electronic |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | No | No |
| Cruise Control | No | No |
| Multi-Info Display | No | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | Yes |
| Reverse Camera | No | Yes |
| Auto Headlights | No | Yes |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | No | Yes |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | Yes |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 4-Speakers | 10 |
| Touchscreen | No | Yes |
| Navigation | No | No |
| Bluetooth | No | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | No | No |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| AUX Input | No | Yes |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | Yes |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | Yes |
| iPod Support | No | Yes |
| SD Card Slot | No | Yes |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | Halogen | BI – Xenon |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | Yes |
| Performance & Economy | ||
| 0–60 mph | — | 4.4 seconds |
| Top Speed | — | 285 km/h |
Suzuki Ertiga GL (2015) vs Porsche 718 Cayman S (2017): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer looking for practicality and affordability, the Suzuki Ertiga GL is the better choice. Its reliable engine, spacious interior, and lower price make it ideal for families or those needing a versatile vehicle for daily use. The Porsche 718 Cayman S, while powerful and sporty, is not as practical and its high cost makes it less suitable for everyday driving needs.
Frequently asked questions
Which car has better fuel efficiency?
The Ertiga GL does not provide specific fuel economy figures, but its naturally aspirated engine may offer better mileage than the Porsche's turbocharged flat-4. The Cayman S also doesn't specify fuel consumption details.
How much power do each of these cars have?
The Ertiga GL has 98 PS and 130 Nm of torque, suitable for a family vehicle but not as powerful as the Porsche's 350 PS and 420 Nm of torque in a smaller package.
Which car is better suited for daily commuting?
The Ertiga GL with its FWD setup and lower price point makes it more practical for daily use compared to the Porsche's RWD which requires more maintenance due to heavier weight.
How fast can each of these cars go from 0-60 mph?
The Ertiga GL accelerates at a slower pace with a time of 13.5 seconds, while the Cayman S reaches this speed in just 4.4 seconds making it quicker and more suitable for sports driving.