Suzuki Ertiga GL (2015) vs Hyundai IONIQ 9 Calligraphy AWD Long Range (2026)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Suzuki Ertiga GL (2015) vs Hyundai IONIQ 9 Calligraphy AWD Long Range (2026) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Suzuki Ertiga GL (2015) Suzuki ₱712,000 | Hyundai IONIQ 9 Calligraphy AWD Long Range (2026) Hyundai ₱4,580,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2015 | 2026 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 5-years/200,000km |
| Availability | Discontinued | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Electric Motor |
| Displacement | 1373cc | — |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-valve with VVT | — |
| Aspiration | Naturally Aspirated | — |
| Fuel Type | Gas | Electric |
| Max Power | 98 PS @ 6000 rpm | 304 PS |
| Max Torque | 130 Nm @ 4000 rpm | 608 Nm |
| Transmission | 5-Speed M/T | Automatic |
| Drivetrain | FWD | AWD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | MPV | Large Crossover SUV |
| Segment | M | Crossover |
| Construction | Body On Frame | Unibody |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+2+3 | 2+2+3 |
| Length (mm) | 4265 | 5060 |
| Width (mm) | 1695 | 1980 |
| Height (mm) | 1685 | 1790 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2740 | 3130 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 1180 | 2505 |
| Exterior Colors | — | Serenity White, Abyss Black, Biophilic Blue, Nocturne Grey, Ionosphere Green, Celadon Grey |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | MacPherson with Coil Spring | MacPherson Strut w/Coil Spring |
| Rear Suspension | Torsion Beam w/ Coil Spring | Multi-link with Coil Spring |
| Front Wheels | 15 Alloy | 21 |
| Rear Wheels | 15 Alloy | 21 |
| Front Tires | 185/65 R15 | 285/45R21 |
| Rear Tires | 185/65 R15 | 285/45R21 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Steering Type | electronic | EPS |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | Yes |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Steering Column | — | Tilt & Telescope |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | No | No |
| Parking Sensors | No | Yes |
| Stability Control | No | Yes |
| Traction Control | No | Yes |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | — |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | No | No |
| Hill Descent Control | No | Yes |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | No | Yes |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | No | Yes |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | Yes |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | Yes |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | Yes |
| Engine Immobilizer | Yes | Yes |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Automatic Air Conditioning | Automatic Climate Control Dual Zone |
| Rear A/C Vents | No | Yes |
| Seat Material | Fabric | Leather |
| Parking Brake | Manual | EPB |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | No | Yes |
| Cruise Control | No | Yes |
| Multi-Info Display | No | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | Yes |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | No | Yes |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | Yes |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 4-Speakers | 14 |
| Touchscreen | No | Yes |
| Navigation | No | Yes |
| Bluetooth | No | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | No | Yes |
| Android Auto | No | Yes |
| USB | Yes | No |
| AUX Input | No | No |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | No |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | No |
| iPod Support | No | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | Halogen | LED |
| Fog Lights | Yes | No |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | Yes |
Suzuki Ertiga GL (2015) vs Hyundai IONIQ 9 Calligraphy AWD Long Range (2026): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer, the choice depends entirely on budget and power needs. The 2015 Suzuki Ertiga GL is the clear choice for those prioritizing affordability and fuel economy, sitting at ₱712,000 with a naturally aspirated 1.4L engine producing 98 PS. It is discontinued, meaning parts availability is limited, but it remains the only option under ₱1 million. Conversely, the 2026 Hyundai IONIQ 9 Calligraphy AWD is for buyers seeking modern technology, ample power (304 PS), and a warranty of 5-years/200,000km at a premium price of ₱4,580,000. While the IONIQ 9 offers AWD and electric power, its significantly higher cost and 5-door configuration make it less practical than the Ertiga's 5-door layout for smaller urban spaces. Ultimately, choose the Ertiga for budget-conscious buyers needing a 7-seater, or the IONIQ 9 for those willing to pay a premium for electric performance and a newer model year.
Frequently asked questions
Which vehicle is cheaper?
The 2015 Suzuki Ertiga GL is significantly cheaper at ₱712,000 compared to the 2026 Hyundai IONIQ 9 Calligraphy AWD Long Range which costs ₱4,580,000.
Which has more power?
The 2026 Hyundai IONIQ 9 Calligraphy AWD Long Range is more powerful with 304 PS and 608 Nm of torque, whereas the 2015 Suzuki Ertiga GL produces only 98 PS and 130 Nm.
Which is better for daily commuting in the Philippines?
The 2015 Suzuki Ertiga GL is likely better for daily commuting due to its lower price, smaller length (4265mm), and naturally aspirated engine, while the IONIQ 9 is larger (5060mm long) and costs over 6 times as much.
What is the warranty period for each?
The 2015 Suzuki Ertiga GL offers a warranty of 100,000km or 3-years, while the 2026 Hyundai IONIQ 9 Calligraphy AWD Long Range provides a longer warranty of 5-years or 200,000km.