Toyota 86 Aero 2.0 AT (2015) vs BYD Tang DM-i (2026)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Toyota 86 Aero 2.0 AT (2015) vs BYD Tang DM-i (2026) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Toyota 86 Aero 2.0 AT (2015) Toyota ₱1,946,000 | BYD Tang DM-i (2026) BYD ₱2,148,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2015 | 2026 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 6 years or 150,000 km |
| Availability | Not available | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Flat-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 1998cc | 1498cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-valve | DOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Naturally Aspirated | Turbocharged |
| Fuel Type | Gas | PHEV |
| Max Power | 200 PS @ 7000 rpm | 271 PS |
| Max Torque | 205 Nm @ 6400-6600 rpm | 315 Nm |
| Transmission | 6-Speed A/T | Automatic 6-Speed |
| Drivetrain | RWD | FWD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Coupe | Midsize Crossover SUV |
| Segment | S | Crossover |
| Construction | Unibody | Unibody |
| Doors | 2 | 5 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+2 | 2+3+2 |
| Length (mm) | 4255 | 4870 |
| Width (mm) | 1795 | 1950 |
| Height (mm) | 1285 | 1720 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2570 | 2820 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 1298 | 2130 |
| Exterior Colors | — | Moonstone Grey, Pearl White, and Silver Sand Black |
| Fuel Tank (L) | — | 53 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | MacPherson | MacPherson Strut w/Coil Spring |
| Rear Suspension | Double Wishbone | Multi-link with Coil Spring |
| Front Wheels | 17x7" Alloys | 20 |
| Rear Wheels | 17x7" Alloys | 20 |
| Front Tires | 215/45 R17 | 255/55R20 |
| Rear Tires | 215/45 R17 | 255/55R20 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Ventilated Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Disc | Solid Disc |
| Steering Column | tilt | Tilt & Telescope |
| Steering Ratio | 5.4 | — |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | Yes |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Steering Type | — | EPS |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | No | Yes |
| Brake Assist | No | No |
| Parking Sensors | No | No |
| Stability Control | Yes | No |
| Traction Control | Yes | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | Yes |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | No | Yes |
| Hill Descent Control | No | Yes |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | No |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | No |
| Front Curtain Airbags | Yes | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | Yes | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | Yes | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | Yes | Yes |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Dual Zone Automatic Climate Control | Automatic Climate Control Dual Zone |
| Rear A/C Vents | No | Yes |
| Seat Material | Leather with Red Stitching | Leather |
| Parking Brake | Manual | EPB |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | Yes | No |
| Cruise Control | Yes | Yes |
| Multi-Info Display | No | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | Yes | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | No |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | No | Yes |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | Yes |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 6 | 12 |
| Touchscreen | No | Yes |
| Navigation | No | No |
| Bluetooth | No | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | No | Yes |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | No |
| AUX Input | Yes | No |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | No |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | No |
| iPod Support | No | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | HID | LED |
| Fog Lights | Yes | No |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | Yes |
Toyota 86 Aero 2.0 AT (2015) vs BYD Tang DM-i (2026): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer prioritizing performance and sporty driving, the 2015 Toyota 86 Aero 2.0 AT is the clear choice despite its higher price of ₱1,946,000. It offers a naturally aspirated 2‑liter flat‑4 engine delivering 200 PS at 7,000 rpm and 205 Nm of torque, coupled with a 6‑speed manual transmission and rear‑wheel drive that give it a genuine sports‑car feel. The 86’s coupe body, two‑door layout and 2+2 seating make it ideal for weekend driving or track days rather than daily commuting. Conversely, the 2026 BYD Tang DM‑i, priced at ₱2,148,000, is a plug‑in hybrid midsize crossover with a turbocharged 1.5‑liter inline‑4 producing 271 PS and 315 Nm of torque, an automatic 6‑speed gearbox, front‑wheel drive, and a practical five‑door configuration that seats up to seven. Its longer wheelbase, larger interior space, and hybrid powertrain make it better suited for family use or daily commuting. Ultimately, choose the Toyota 86 if you want a pure sports‑car experience and are willing to pay a premium for performance; choose the BYD Tang DM‑i if you need more space, practicality and a hybrid powertrain for everyday use.
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper?
The Toyota 86 Aero 2.0 AT costs ₱1,946,000 while the BYD Tang DM‑i is priced at ₱2,148,000, so the Toyota is cheaper by ₱202,000.
Which has more power?
The BYD Tang DM‑i produces 271 PS and 315 Nm, compared to the Toyota’s 200 PS and 205 Nm, so the Tang has higher power and torque.
Which is better for daily commuting?
The BYD Tang DM‑i’s five‑door crossover body, seven‑seat capacity and plug‑in hybrid powertrain make it more practical for daily commuting than the two‑door, 2+2 Toyota coupe.
Which has a longer warranty?
The BYD Tang DM‑i offers 6 years or 150,000 km warranty, whereas the Toyota provides only 100,000 km/3‑year coverage.