Toyota 86 Aero 2.0 MT (2015) vs GAC Aion V Premium (2026)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Toyota 86 Aero 2.0 MT (2015) vs GAC Aion V Premium (2026) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Toyota 86 Aero 2.0 MT (2015) Toyota ₱1,846,000 | GAC Aion V Premium (2026) GAC ₱1,698,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2015 | 2026 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 8-year / 160,000 km |
| Availability | Not available | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Flat-4 | Electric Motor |
| Displacement | 1998cc | — |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-valve | — |
| Aspiration | Naturally Aspirated | — |
| Fuel Type | Gas | Electric |
| Max Power | 200 PS @ 7000 rpm | 224 PS |
| Max Torque | 205 Nm @ 6400-6600 rpm | 240 Nm |
| Transmission | 6-Speed A/T | Automatic |
| Drivetrain | RWD | FWD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Coupe | Midsize Crossover SUV |
| Segment | S | Crossover |
| Construction | Unibody | Unibody |
| Doors | 2 | 5 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+2 | 2+3 |
| Length (mm) | 4255 | 4605 |
| Width (mm) | 1795 | 1854 |
| Height (mm) | 1285 | 1686 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2570 | 2775 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 1298 | 2330 |
| Exterior Colors | — | Sahara Sand, Onyx Black, Alpine White, Volcano Orange, Aurora Silver, Iceland Grey, Volcano Orange with White Roof |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | MacPherson | MacPherson Strut w/ Coil Spring |
| Rear Suspension | Double Wishbone | Torsion beam w/Coil Spring |
| Front Wheels | 17x7" Alloys | 19 |
| Rear Wheels | 17x7" Alloys | 19 |
| Front Tires | 215/45 R17 | 235/55R19 |
| Rear Tires | 215/45 R17 | 235/55R19 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Steering Column | tilt | Tilt |
| Steering Ratio | 5.4 | — |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | Yes |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Steering Type | — | EPS |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | No | Yes |
| Brake Assist | No | No |
| Parking Sensors | No | No |
| Stability Control | Yes | No |
| Traction Control | Yes | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | No | Yes |
| Hill Descent Control | No | Yes |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | No |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | No |
| Front Curtain Airbags | Yes | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | Yes | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | Yes | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | Yes | Yes |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Dual Zone Automatic Climate Control | Automatic Climate Control Dual Zone |
| Rear A/C Vents | No | No |
| Seat Material | Leather with Red Stitching | PVC |
| Parking Brake | Manual | EPB |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | Yes | No |
| Cruise Control | Yes | No |
| Multi-Info Display | No | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | No |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | No | Yes |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | Yes |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 6 | 9 |
| Touchscreen | No | Yes |
| Navigation | No | Yes |
| Bluetooth | No | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | No | Yes |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | No |
| AUX Input | Yes | No |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | No |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | No |
| iPod Support | No | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | HID | LED |
| Fog Lights | Yes | No |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | Yes |
Toyota 86 Aero 2.0 MT (2015) vs GAC Aion V Premium (2026): which should you buy?
The Toyota 86 Aero 2.0 MT (2015) is the better choice for Filipino buyers prioritizing pure driving fun and handling, especially if budget is a constraint. At ₱1,846,000, it is significantly cheaper than the ₱1,698,000 GAC Aion V Premium, yet still delivers 200 PS of power and a rear-wheel-drive layout. The 86’s naturally aspirated engine and manual transmission offer direct driver engagement, while the GAC’s electric powertrain and front-wheel-drive architecture emphasize efficiency and practicality. The 86 is limited to a coupe body with 2+2 seating and is not currently available in the Philippines, whereas the GAC is a current, 5-door midsize crossover with 2+3 capacity. For most daily commutes, the GAC’s larger footprint and 8-year/160,000 km warranty provide greater reliability and value, but the 86’s heritage appeal and spirited performance make it ideal for driving enthusiasts. With a 100,000 km/3-year warranty, the 86 offers peace of mind for budget-conscious owners, while the GAC’s extended coverage addresses long-term concerns.
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper?
The Toyota 86 Aero 2.0 MT (2015) costs ₱1,846,000, while the GAC Aion V Premium (2026) is ₱1,698,000.
Which is more powerful?
The GAC Aion V Premium (2026) produces 224 PS, compared to 200 PS for the Toyota 86 Aero 2.0 MT (2015).
Which is better for daily commuting?
The GAC Aion V Premium (2026) has a larger body (4605 mm length) and 2+3 seating, making it more practical for daily use, whereas the Toyota 86 Aero 2.0 MT (2015) is a 2+2 coupe with a 4255 mm length.
Is the GAC available in the Philippines?
Yes, the GAC Aion V Premium (2026) is currently available.