Toyota 86 Aero 2.0 MT (White Pearl) (2015) vs Audi A1 Sportback 1.4 TFSI (2016)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Toyota 86 Aero 2.0 MT (White Pearl) (2015) vs Audi A1 Sportback 1.4 TFSI (2016) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Toyota 86 Aero 2.0 MT (White Pearl) (2015) Toyota ₱1,861,000 | Audi A1 Sportback 1.4 TFSI (2016) Audi ₱1,990,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2015 | 2016 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | Unlimited/2-years |
| Availability | Not available | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Flat-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 1998cc | 1395cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-valve | DOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Naturally Aspirated | Turbocharged |
| Fuel Type | Gas | Gas |
| Max Power | 200 PS @ 7000 rpm | 125 PS @ 5000 rpm |
| Max Torque | 205 Nm @ 6400-6600 rpm | 200 Nm @ 1400-4000 rpm |
| Transmission | 6-Speed A/T | 7-Speed DCT |
| Drivetrain | RWD | FWD |
| Compression Ratio | — | 10.0:1 |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
| Segment | S | A |
| Construction | Unibody | Unibody |
| Doors | 2 | 5 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+2 | 4 |
| Length (mm) | 4255 | 3973 |
| Width (mm) | 1795 | 1746 |
| Height (mm) | 1285 | 1422 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2570 | 2469 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 1298 | 1140 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | — | 45 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | MacPherson | McPherson struts with lower wishbones, anti-roll bar, track-stabilizing steering roll radius, steel subframe |
| Rear Suspension | Double Wishbone | Torsion-beam with separate spring/shock absorber |
| Front Wheels | 17x7" Alloys | 16" alloy |
| Rear Wheels | 17x7" Alloys | 16" alloy |
| Front Tires | 215/45 R17 | 215/45 R16 |
| Rear Tires | 215/45 R17 | 215/45 R16 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Steering Column | tilt | Electromechanical |
| Steering Ratio | 5.4 | — |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Steering Type | — | EPS |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | No | Yes |
| Brake Assist | No | Yes |
| Parking Sensors | No | No |
| Stability Control | Yes | Yes |
| Traction Control | Yes | Yes |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | Yes |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | No | No |
| Hill Descent Control | No | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Front Curtain Airbags | Yes | Yes |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | Yes | Yes |
| Rear Side Airbags | Yes | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | Yes | Yes |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Dual Zone Automatic Climate Control | Auto Climate Control |
| Rear A/C Vents | No | No |
| Seat Material | Leather with Red Stitching | Fabric |
| Parking Brake | Manual | Manual |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | Yes | No |
| Cruise Control | Yes | No |
| Multi-Info Display | No | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | Yes |
| Reverse Camera | No | No |
| Auto Headlights | No | Yes |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | No | No |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 6 | 13 |
| Touchscreen | No | No |
| Navigation | No | No |
| Bluetooth | No | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | No | No |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | No |
| AUX Input | Yes | Yes |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | Yes |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | Yes |
| iPod Support | No | Yes |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | HID | Bi-Xenon |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | Yes |
| Performance & Economy | ||
| 0–60 mph | — | 8.9 seconds |
| Top Speed | — | 204km/h |
Toyota 86 Aero 2.0 MT (White Pearl) (2015) vs Audi A1 Sportback 1.4 TFSI (2016): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer looking for a compact sports car with good performance and reliability, the Toyota 86 Aero 2.0 MT is the better choice. It offers more power, better fuel efficiency, and has a longer warranty compared to the Audi A1 Sportback. The Toyota's naturally aspirated engine produces 200 PS at 7000 rpm with 205 Nm of torque from 6400-6600 rpm, making it suitable for spirited driving and daily commuting. In contrast, the Audi's turbocharged inline-four engine delivers only 125 PS and 200 Nm of torque but has a quicker acceleration time and higher top speed.
Frequently asked questions
Which car is cheaper?
The Toyota 86 Aero 2.0 MT costs ₱1,861,000 while the Audi A1 Sportback starts at ₱1,990,000.
Which car has better fuel efficiency?
Both cars have similar power-to-weight ratios and should offer comparable fuel efficiency. However, the Toyota's naturally aspirated engine might be slightly more efficient for daily driving.
Which car is better for daily commuting?
The Toyota 86 Aero 2.0 MT is better suited for daily commuting due to its higher top speed of 179 km/h and longer warranty period compared to the Audi A1 Sportback's 204 km/h top speed.
Which car has a better acceleration performance?
The Audi A1 Sportback with its turbocharged engine can accelerate from 0-60 mph in just 8.9 seconds, outpacing the Toyota 86 Aero 2.0 MT's naturally aspirated engine which takes around 7000 rpm to reach peak power.