Toyota 86 Aero 2.0 MT (White Pearl) (2015) vs Nissan Urvan Premium 2.5 AT (2017)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Toyota 86 Aero 2.0 MT (White Pearl) (2015) vs Nissan Urvan Premium 2.5 AT (2017) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Toyota 86 Aero 2.0 MT (White Pearl) (2015) Toyota ₱1,861,000 | Nissan Urvan Premium 2.5 AT (2017) Nissan ₱1,836,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2015 | 2017 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 3-years/100,000km |
| Availability | Not available | Discontinued |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Flat-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 1998cc | 2488cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-valve | DOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Naturally Aspirated | Turbocharged Intercooled, VGS |
| Fuel Type | Gas | — |
| Max Power | 200 PS @ 7000 rpm | 129 PS @ 3200 rpm |
| Max Torque | 205 Nm @ 6400-6600 rpm | 356 Nm @ 1400 - 2000 rpm |
| Transmission | 6-Speed A/T | 5-speed A/T |
| Drivetrain | RWD | RWD |
| Compression Ratio | — | 15:1 |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Coupe | Van |
| Segment | S | M |
| Construction | Unibody | Body-on-frame |
| Doors | 2 | 4 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+2 | 15 |
| Length (mm) | 4255 | 5230 |
| Width (mm) | 1795 | 1880 |
| Height (mm) | 1285 | 2285 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2570 | 2940 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 1298 | — |
| Fuel Tank (L) | — | 65 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | MacPherson | Torsion Bar |
| Rear Suspension | Double Wishbone | Rigid Axle w/ Leaf Spring |
| Front Wheels | 17x7" Alloys | 15 steel |
| Rear Wheels | 17x7" Alloys | 15 steel |
| Front Tires | 215/45 R17 | 195/70/R15 |
| Rear Tires | 215/45 R17 | 195/70/R15 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Disc | Drum |
| Steering Column | tilt | Tilt |
| Steering Ratio | 5.4 | — |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Steering Type | — | Hydraulic |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | No | Yes |
| Brake Assist | No | Yes |
| Parking Sensors | No | Yes |
| Stability Control | Yes | No |
| Traction Control | Yes | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | No | No |
| Hill Descent Control | No | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Front Curtain Airbags | Yes | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | Yes | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | Yes | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | Yes | No |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Dual Zone Automatic Climate Control | Manual Air Conditioning |
| Rear A/C Vents | No | Yes |
| Seat Material | Leather with Red Stitching | Fabric |
| Parking Brake | Manual | Manual |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | Yes | No |
| Cruise Control | Yes | No |
| Multi-Info Display | No | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | No |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | No | No |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 6 | 4 |
| Touchscreen | No | No |
| Navigation | No | No |
| Bluetooth | No | No |
| Apple CarPlay | No | No |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | No |
| AUX Input | Yes | Yes |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | Yes |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | No |
| iPod Support | No | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | HID | Halogen |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | No |
Toyota 86 Aero 2.0 MT (White Pearl) (2015) vs Nissan Urvan Premium 2.5 AT (2017): which should you buy?
Both the 2015 Toyota 86 Aero 2.0 MT and the 2017 Nissan Urvan Premium 2.5 AT are priced similarly, with the 86 at ₱1,861,000 and the Urvan at ₱1,836,000, but they serve completely different needs. The 86 is a two‑door sports coupe built on a unibody chassis, offering RWD dynamics, a flat‑4 naturally aspirated engine that produces 200 PS and 205 Nm, and a 6‑speed automatic transmission. Its compact 4,255 mm length and 2+2 seating make it suitable for a driver‑oriented experience, weekend runs, or a small family that values performance over passenger capacity. In contrast, the Urvan is a body‑on‑frame van with a turbocharged 2.5 L inline‑4 delivering 129 PS but a much higher torque of 356 Nm at low rpm, paired with a 5‑speed automatic. Its 5,230 mm length and 15‑seat configuration target commercial use, large families, or shuttle services. Practicality-wise, the Urvan wins on passenger volume, cargo space, and low‑end torque for city driving with heavy loads, while the 86 excels in driving excitement and sporty styling. Availability is a factor: the 86 is listed as not available, whereas the Urvan is discontinued but may still be sourced in the secondary market. Choose the Toyota 86 if you prioritize performance, style, and a sporty driving feel for two‑plus‑two use. Opt for the Nissan Urvan if you need a high‑capacity people‑mover with strong low‑end torque for daily commuting or business purposes.
Frequently asked questions
Which vehicle is cheaper?
The Nissan Urvan Premium 2.5 AT is slightly cheaper at ₱1,836,000 compared to the Toyota 86 Aero 2.0 MT at ₱1,861,000.
Which model has more power?
The Toyota 86 Aero produces 200 PS, whereas the Nissan Urvan Premium delivers 129 PS, making the 86 more powerful.
Which vehicle is more practical for a large family?
The Nissan Urvan, with 15 seats, a body‑on‑frame construction and a longer wheelbase, is far more practical for a large family than the 86’s 2+2 seating.
Is either model still in production?
Both are not currently available: the Toyota 86 is listed as not available, and the Nissan Urvan Premium is discontinued.