Toyota 86 Aero 2.0 MT (White Pearl) (2015) vs Nissan Urvan Premium 2.5 MT (2017)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Toyota 86 Aero 2.0 MT (White Pearl) (2015) vs Nissan Urvan Premium 2.5 MT (2017) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Toyota 86 Aero 2.0 MT (White Pearl) (2015) Toyota ₱1,861,000 | Nissan Urvan Premium 2.5 MT (2017) Nissan ₱1,776,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2015 | 2017 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 100,000 km/3-years |
| Availability | Not available | Discontinued |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Flat-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 1998cc | 2488cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-valve | DOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Naturally Aspirated | Turbocharged |
| Fuel Type | Gas | Diesel |
| Max Power | 200 PS @ 7000 rpm | 129 PS @ 3200 rpm |
| Max Torque | 205 Nm @ 6400-6600 rpm | 256 Nm @ 1400-2000 rpm |
| Transmission | 6-Speed A/T | 5-Speed M/T |
| Drivetrain | RWD | FWD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Coupe | Van |
| Segment | S | M |
| Construction | Unibody | — |
| Doors | 2 | 4 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+2 | 15 |
| Length (mm) | 4255 | 5230 |
| Width (mm) | 1795 | 1880 |
| Height (mm) | 1285 | 2285 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2570 | 2940 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 1298 | 2190 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | — | 65 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | MacPherson | Torsion Bar with Stabilizer |
| Rear Suspension | Double Wishbone | Leaf Spring |
| Front Wheels | 17x7" Alloys | 15'' Steel |
| Rear Wheels | 17x7" Alloys | 15'' Steel |
| Front Tires | 215/45 R17 | 195 R15C |
| Rear Tires | 215/45 R17 | 195 R15C |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Disc | Drum |
| Steering Column | tilt | Tilt |
| Steering Ratio | 5.4 | — |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Steering Type | — | EPS |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | No | Yes |
| Brake Assist | No | No |
| Parking Sensors | No | No |
| Stability Control | Yes | No |
| Traction Control | Yes | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | No | No |
| Hill Descent Control | No | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Front Curtain Airbags | Yes | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | Yes | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | Yes | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | Yes | No |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Dual Zone Automatic Climate Control | Manual Aircon |
| Rear A/C Vents | No | Yes |
| Seat Material | Leather with Red Stitching | Fabric |
| Parking Brake | Manual | Manual |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | Yes | No |
| Cruise Control | Yes | No |
| Multi-Info Display | No | No |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | No |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | No | No |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 6 | 4 |
| Touchscreen | No | No |
| Navigation | No | No |
| Bluetooth | No | No |
| Apple CarPlay | No | No |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| AUX Input | Yes | Yes |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | Yes |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | Yes |
| iPod Support | No | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | HID | Halogen |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | No |
Toyota 86 Aero 2.0 MT (White Pearl) (2015) vs Nissan Urvan Premium 2.5 MT (2017): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer, the choice between the Toyota 86 Aero 2.0 MT and the Nissan Urvan Premium 2.5 MT depends entirely on your needs. The Toyota 86 is a sporty rear-wheel-drive coupe with a 2.0L naturally aspirated flat-4 engine producing 200 PS and 205 Nm, paired with a 6-speed automatic. It seats 2+2 and is designed for driving enthusiasts, but it's not available new and has limited practicality. The Nissan Urvan is a front-wheel-drive 15-seater van with a 2.5L turbo diesel engine making 129 PS and 256 Nm, mated to a 5-speed manual. It's discontinued but offers immense passenger capacity and diesel torque for hauling. At ₱1,861,000 vs ₱1,776,000, the Urvan is slightly cheaper. If you need a family or commercial vehicle for transporting many people, the Urvan is the clear choice. If you want a fun, lightweight sports car for weekend drives, the 86 is unmatched. For daily commuting, the Urvan is more practical due to its space and diesel efficiency, while the 86 is a niche weekend toy. Neither is ideal as a sole daily driver for most families.
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper?
The Nissan Urvan Premium is cheaper at ₱1,776,000 compared to the Toyota 86 Aero at ₱1,861,000.
Which is more powerful?
The Toyota 86 has more power with 200 PS, while the Nissan Urvan has 129 PS. However, the Urvan has higher torque (256 Nm vs 205 Nm), which is better for hauling.
Which is better for daily commuting?
The Nissan Urvan is better for daily commuting if you need to carry many passengers or cargo, thanks to its 15-seat capacity and diesel engine. The Toyota 86 is less practical for daily use due to its small 2+2 seating and sporty nature.
Which has better fuel economy?
The data does not provide fuel economy figures. However, the Nissan Urvan uses a turbo diesel, which typically offers better fuel efficiency for heavy loads, while the Toyota 86's gasoline engine may be less efficient.