Toyota 86 Aero 2.0 MT (White Pearl) (2015) vs Chevrolet Captiva Premier EV (2026)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Toyota 86 Aero 2.0 MT (White Pearl) (2015) vs Chevrolet Captiva Premier EV (2026) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Toyota 86 Aero 2.0 MT (White Pearl) (2015) Toyota ₱1,861,000 | Chevrolet Captiva Premier EV (2026) Chevrolet ₱1,999,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2015 | 2026 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 5 years/100,000 kms |
| Availability | Not available | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Flat-4 | Electric Motor |
| Displacement | 1998cc | — |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-valve | — |
| Aspiration | Naturally Aspirated | Naturally Aspirated |
| Fuel Type | Gas | Electric |
| Max Power | 200 PS @ 7000 rpm | 201 PS |
| Max Torque | 205 Nm @ 6400-6600 rpm | 310 Nm |
| Transmission | 6-Speed A/T | Automatic |
| Drivetrain | RWD | FWD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Coupe | MPV AUV |
| Segment | S | MPV |
| Construction | Unibody | Unibody |
| Doors | 2 | 5 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+2 | 5 |
| Length (mm) | 4255 | 4745 |
| Width (mm) | 1795 | 1890 |
| Height (mm) | 1285 | 1675 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2570 | 2800 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 1298 | 1835 |
| Exterior Colors | — | Black, Red, Grey, White |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | MacPherson | MacPherson Strut |
| Rear Suspension | Double Wishbone | Independent |
| Front Wheels | 17x7" Alloys | 18 Alloys |
| Rear Wheels | 17x7" Alloys | 18 Alloys |
| Front Tires | 215/45 R17 | 235/55R18 |
| Rear Tires | 215/45 R17 | 235/55R18 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Steering Column | tilt | Tilt & Telescope |
| Steering Ratio | 5.4 | — |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | Yes |
| Differential Lock | No | — |
| Steering Type | — | EPS |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | No | Yes |
| Brake Assist | No | Yes |
| Parking Sensors | No | Yes |
| Stability Control | Yes | Yes |
| Traction Control | Yes | Yes |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | — |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | — |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | — |
| Hill Start Assist | No | — |
| Hill Descent Control | No | — |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | — |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Knee Airbag | No | Yes |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Front Curtain Airbags | Yes | Yes |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | Yes | Yes |
| Rear Side Airbags | Yes | Yes |
| Engine Immobilizer | Yes | Yes |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Dual Zone Automatic Climate Control | Automatic Climate Control |
| Rear A/C Vents | No | — |
| Seat Material | Leather with Red Stitching | Leather |
| Parking Brake | Manual | EPB |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless |
| Push-Button Start | Yes | Yes |
| Cruise Control | Yes | Yes |
| Multi-Info Display | No | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | — |
| Reverse Camera | No | Yes |
| Auto Headlights | No | — |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | No | Yes |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | — |
| Eco Mode | No | — |
| Antenna | yes | — |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 6 | 6 |
| Touchscreen | No | Yes |
| Navigation | No | — |
| Bluetooth | No | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | No | Yes |
| Android Auto | No | Yes |
| USB | Yes | — |
| AUX Input | Yes | — |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | — |
| CD Player | Yes | — |
| DVD Player | No | — |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | — |
| iPod Support | No | — |
| SD Card Slot | No | — |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | HID | LED |
| Fog Lights | Yes | — |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | Yes |
Toyota 86 Aero 2.0 MT (White Pearl) (2015) vs Chevrolet Captiva Premier EV (2026): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer looking for a compact sports car with good performance and practicality, the Toyota 86 Aero 2.0 MT is the better choice. It offers superior power, better fuel efficiency, and more engaging driving experience compared to the Chevrolet Captiva Premier EV. The Captiva, while electric, lacks the sporty appeal of the Toyota.
Frequently asked questions
Which vehicle has better performance based on the data provided?
The Toyota 86 Aero 2.0 MT outperforms the Chevrolet Captiva Premier EV with higher power and torque figures.
Is the Toyota 86 Aero 2.0 MT more affordable than the Chevrolet Captiva Premier EV?
No, the Toyota 86 Aero 2.0 MT is slightly pricier at ₱1,861,000 compared to the Chevrolet Captiva Premier EV priced at ₱1,999,000.
Which vehicle is better suited for daily commuting?
The Toyota 86 Aero 2.0 MT is more practical for daily use due to its smaller size and better fuel efficiency.
Does the Chevrolet Captiva Premier EV offer any unique features not present in the Toyota 86 Aero 2.0 MT?
No, both vehicles share similar basic specifications such as engine type (electric motor vs naturally aspirated), transmission type (automatic for Captiva), and body style (MPV).