Toyota 86 Aero 2.0 MT (White Pearl) (2015) vs Ford Ranger 2.0L Turbo Sport 4×2 A/T (2023)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Toyota 86 Aero 2.0 MT (White Pearl) (2015) vs Ford Ranger 2.0L Turbo Sport 4×2 A/T (2023) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Toyota 86 Aero 2.0 MT (White Pearl) (2015) Toyota ₱1,861,000 | Ford Ranger 2.0L Turbo Sport 4×2 A/T (2023) Ford ₱1,820,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2015 | 2023 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 5-years/150,000km |
| Availability | Not available | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Flat-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 1998cc | 1996cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-valve | DOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Naturally Aspirated | Turbocharged |
| Fuel Type | Gas | Diesel |
| Max Power | 200 PS @ 7000 rpm | 170 PS @ 3500 rpm |
| Max Torque | 205 Nm @ 6400-6600 rpm | 405 Nm @ 1750 - 2500 rpm |
| Transmission | 6-Speed A/T | 6-A/T |
| Drivetrain | RWD | RWD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Coupe | Pickup |
| Segment | S | Pickup |
| Construction | Unibody | Body-on-frame |
| Doors | 2 | 4 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+2 | 2+3 |
| Length (mm) | 4255 | 5370 |
| Width (mm) | 1795 | 1918 |
| Height (mm) | 1285 | 1884 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2570 | 3270 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 1298 | 1953 |
| Exterior Colors | — | Aluminum Metallic, Sunset Red, Cool White, Blue Reflex, Meteor Grey, Absolute Black, Saber, Diffused Silver |
| Fuel Tank (L) | — | 80 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | MacPherson | Double Wishbone, Coil Spring |
| Rear Suspension | Double Wishbone | Leaf Spring |
| Front Wheels | 17x7" Alloys | 16 |
| Rear Wheels | 17x7" Alloys | 16 |
| Front Tires | 215/45 R17 | 255/70/R16 |
| Rear Tires | 215/45 R17 | 255/70/R16 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Disc | Drum |
| Steering Column | tilt | Tilt |
| Steering Ratio | 5.4 | — |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | Yes |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Steering Type | — | EPS |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | No | Yes |
| Brake Assist | No | Yes |
| Parking Sensors | No | Yes |
| Stability Control | Yes | Yes |
| Traction Control | Yes | Yes |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | — |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | No | Yes |
| Hill Descent Control | No | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Knee Airbag | No | Yes |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Front Curtain Airbags | Yes | Yes |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | Yes | Yes |
| Rear Side Airbags | Yes | Yes |
| Engine Immobilizer | Yes | Yes |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Dual Zone Automatic Climate Control | Manual Airconditioning |
| Rear A/C Vents | No | No |
| Seat Material | Leather with Red Stitching | Fabric |
| Parking Brake | Manual | Manual |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | Yes | Yes |
| Cruise Control | Yes | Yes |
| Multi-Info Display | No | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | Yes |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | No | No |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 6 | 4 |
| Touchscreen | No | Yes |
| Navigation | No | Yes |
| Bluetooth | No | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | No | Yes |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | No |
| AUX Input | Yes | No |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | No |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | No |
| iPod Support | No | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | HID | Halogen |
| Fog Lights | Yes | No |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | No |
Toyota 86 Aero 2.0 MT (White Pearl) (2015) vs Ford Ranger 2.0L Turbo Sport 4×2 A/T (2023): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer looking for a compact sports car with decent power and practicality, the Toyota 86 Aero 2.0 MT is the better choice. It offers more power at 200 PS compared to Ford Ranger's 170 PS, making it suitable for enthusiasts and those who value performance. Additionally, its lower price of ₱1,861,000 makes it a more affordable option. The Toyota also has a longer warranty (100,000km/3-years) compared to Ford's 5-years/150,000km.
Frequently asked questions
Which car is cheaper between Toyota 86 Aero and Ford Ranger?
The Toyota 86 Aero 2.0 MT costs ₱1,861,000 while the Ford Ranger 2.0L Turbo Sport 4×2 A/T starts at ₱1,820,000.
Which car is more powerful between Toyota 86 Aero and Ford Ranger?
The Toyota 86 Aero 2.0 MT has a higher power output of 200 PS compared to the Ford Ranger's 170 PS.
Which car is better for daily commuting?
For daily commuting, the Ford Ranger might be more suitable due to its larger size and increased seating capacity, making it more comfortable and practical for passengers. However, both cars have RWD which limits their ability for off-road conditions.
What type of warranty does each car offer?
The Toyota 86 Aero comes with a 100,000km/3-years warranty, while the Ford Ranger offers a 5-years/150,000km warranty. The Toyota's longer and more comprehensive warranty might be an advantage for long-term ownership.