Toyota 86 Aero 2.0 MT (White Pearl) (2015) vs Ford Ranger 2.0L Turbo Sport 4×4 A/T (2023)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Toyota 86 Aero 2.0 MT (White Pearl) (2015) vs Ford Ranger 2.0L Turbo Sport 4×4 A/T (2023) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Toyota 86 Aero 2.0 MT (White Pearl) (2015) Toyota ₱1,861,000 | Ford Ranger 2.0L Turbo Sport 4×4 A/T (2023) Ford ₱1,964,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2015 | 2023 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 5-years/150,000km |
| Availability | Not available | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Flat-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 1998cc | 1996cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-valve | DOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Naturally Aspirated | Turbocharged |
| Fuel Type | Gas | Diesel |
| Max Power | 200 PS @ 7000 rpm | 170 PS @ 3500 rpm |
| Max Torque | 205 Nm @ 6400-6600 rpm | 405 Nm @ 1750 - 2500 rpm |
| Transmission | 6-Speed A/T | 6-M/T |
| Drivetrain | RWD | 4x4 |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Coupe | Pickup |
| Segment | S | Pickup |
| Construction | Unibody | Body-on-frame |
| Doors | 2 | 4 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+2 | 2+3 |
| Length (mm) | 4255 | 5370 |
| Width (mm) | 1795 | 1918 |
| Height (mm) | 1285 | 1884 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2570 | 3270 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 1298 | 2194 |
| Exterior Colors | — | Aluminum Metallic, Sunset Red, Cool White, Blue Reflex, Meteor Grey, Absolute Black, Saber, Diffused Silver |
| Fuel Tank (L) | — | 80 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | MacPherson | Double Wishbone, Coil Spring |
| Rear Suspension | Double Wishbone | Leaf Spring |
| Front Wheels | 17x7" Alloys | 16 |
| Rear Wheels | 17x7" Alloys | 16 |
| Front Tires | 215/45 R17 | 255/70/R16 |
| Rear Tires | 215/45 R17 | 255/70/R16 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Disc | Drum |
| Steering Column | tilt | Tilt |
| Steering Ratio | 5.4 | — |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | Yes |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Steering Type | — | EPS |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | No | Yes |
| Brake Assist | No | Yes |
| Parking Sensors | No | Yes |
| Stability Control | Yes | Yes |
| Traction Control | Yes | Yes |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | — |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | No | No |
| Hill Descent Control | No | Yes |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Knee Airbag | No | Yes |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Front Curtain Airbags | Yes | Yes |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | Yes | Yes |
| Rear Side Airbags | Yes | Yes |
| Engine Immobilizer | Yes | Yes |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Dual Zone Automatic Climate Control | Manual Airconditioning |
| Rear A/C Vents | No | Yes |
| Seat Material | Leather with Red Stitching | Fabric |
| Parking Brake | Manual | Manual |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | Yes | Yes |
| Cruise Control | Yes | Yes |
| Multi-Info Display | No | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | Yes |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | No | No |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 6 | 4 |
| Touchscreen | No | Yes |
| Navigation | No | Yes |
| Bluetooth | No | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | No | Yes |
| Android Auto | No | Yes |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| AUX Input | Yes | No |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | No |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | No |
| iPod Support | No | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | HID | Halogen |
| Fog Lights | Yes | No |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | Yes |
Toyota 86 Aero 2.0 MT (White Pearl) (2015) vs Ford Ranger 2.0L Turbo Sport 4×4 A/T (2023): which should you buy?
For Filipino buyers seeking a compact and affordable sports coupe with good performance, the Toyota 86 Aero 2.0 MT is a solid choice. It offers better power output at 200 PS compared to Ford Ranger's 170 PS, making it more suitable for spirited driving and handling. The Toyota comes with a longer warranty of 3 years/100,000km as opposed to the Ford's 5 years/150,000km. However, the Ford offers better off-road capability due to its 4x4 setup.
Frequently asked questions
Which vehicle is cheaper between Toyota 86 Aero and Ford Ranger?
The Toyota 86 Aero costs ₱1,861,000 while the Ford Ranger is priced at ₱1,964,000. The Toyota is slightly cheaper by ₱133,000.
Which vehicle provides better power output?
The Toyota 86 Aero outperforms the Ford Ranger with a higher maximum power of 200 PS compared to the Ford's 170 PS.
Which vehicle is more suitable for daily commuting?
The Ford Ranger might be a better choice for daily commuting due to its 4x4 setup, which provides improved off-road capability and traction. However, the Toyota 86 Aero offers better performance with higher power output.
Which vehicle has a longer warranty period?
The Toyota 86 Aero comes with a longer warranty of 3 years/100,000km compared to the Ford Ranger's 5 years/150,000km. The Toyota offers better coverage in terms of both time and distance.