Toyota 86 Aero 2.0 MT (White Pearl) (2015) vs Ford Ranger 2.0L Turbo Wildtrak 4×2 A/T (2023)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Toyota 86 Aero 2.0 MT (White Pearl) (2015) vs Ford Ranger 2.0L Turbo Wildtrak 4×2 A/T (2023) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Toyota 86 Aero 2.0 MT (White Pearl) (2015) Toyota ₱1,861,000 | Ford Ranger 2.0L Turbo Wildtrak 4×2 A/T (2023) Ford ₱1,964,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2015 | 2023 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 5-years/150,000km |
| Availability | Not available | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Flat-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 1998cc | 1996cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-valve | DOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Naturally Aspirated | Turbocharged |
| Fuel Type | Gas | Diesel |
| Max Power | 200 PS @ 7000 rpm | 170 PS @ 3500 rpm |
| Max Torque | 205 Nm @ 6400-6600 rpm | 405 Nm @ 1750 - 2500 rpm |
| Transmission | 6-Speed A/T | 6-A/T |
| Drivetrain | RWD | RWD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Coupe | Pickup |
| Segment | S | Pickup |
| Construction | Unibody | Body-on-frame |
| Doors | 2 | 4 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+2 | 2+3 |
| Length (mm) | 4255 | 5370 |
| Width (mm) | 1795 | 1918 |
| Height (mm) | 1285 | 1884 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2570 | 3270 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 1298 | 2283 |
| Exterior Colors | — | Aluminum Metallic, Sunset Red, Cool White, Blue Reflex, Meteor Grey, Absolute Black, Saber, Diffused Silver |
| Fuel Tank (L) | — | 80 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | MacPherson | Double Wishbone w/ Coil Spring |
| Rear Suspension | Double Wishbone | Leaf Spring |
| Front Wheels | 17x7" Alloys | 18 |
| Rear Wheels | 17x7" Alloys | 18 |
| Front Tires | 215/45 R17 | 255/65/R18 |
| Rear Tires | 215/45 R17 | 255/65/R18 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Steering Column | tilt | Tilt + Telescopic |
| Steering Ratio | 5.4 | — |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | Yes |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Steering Type | — | EPS |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | No | Yes |
| Brake Assist | No | Yes |
| Parking Sensors | No | Yes |
| Stability Control | Yes | Yes |
| Traction Control | Yes | Yes |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | — |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | No | Yes |
| Hill Descent Control | No | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Knee Airbag | No | Yes |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Front Curtain Airbags | Yes | Yes |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | Yes | Yes |
| Rear Side Airbags | Yes | Yes |
| Engine Immobilizer | Yes | Yes |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Dual Zone Automatic Climate Control | Dual Zone Automatic Climate Control |
| Rear A/C Vents | No | Yes |
| Seat Material | Leather with Red Stitching | Leather |
| Parking Brake | Manual | EPB |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | Yes | Yes |
| Cruise Control | Yes | Yes |
| Multi-Info Display | No | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | Yes |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | No | Yes |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 6 | 6 |
| Touchscreen | No | Yes |
| Navigation | No | Yes |
| Bluetooth | No | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | No | Yes |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| AUX Input | Yes | No |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | No |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | No |
| iPod Support | No | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | HID | LED |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | Yes |
Toyota 86 Aero 2.0 MT (White Pearl) (2015) vs Ford Ranger 2.0L Turbo Wildtrak 4×2 A/T (2023): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer, the Toyota 86 Aero 2.0 MT is the clear choice if driving enjoyment and raw power are priorities, while the Ford Ranger 2.0L Turbo Wildtrak is the only logical selection for practical utility and towing needs. The Toyota 86 Aero, priced at ₱1,861,000, offers a 200 PS output with a 6-speed automatic transmission and a 100,000km/3-year warranty, but it is currently unavailable. In contrast, the Ford Ranger Wildtrak, costing ₱1,964,000, provides a turbocharged diesel engine generating 170 PS and 405 Nm of torque, a 6-A/T, and a 5-year/150,000km warranty, with current availability. The Toyota is a 2-door coupe with 2+2 seating and an unibody construction, whereas the Ford is a 4-door pickup with 2+3 seating and a body-on-frame chassis. The Toyota is cheaper by ₱103,000, yet the Ford offers significantly more torque and practical capacity. Ultimately, choose the Toyota 86 for sporty performance on winding roads, or the Ford Ranger for daily work, cargo hauling, and durability.
Frequently asked questions
Which vehicle is cheaper?
The Toyota 86 Aero 2.0 MT is ₱103,000 cheaper at ₱1,861,000 compared to the Ford Ranger 2.0L Turbo Wildtrak at ₱1,964,000.
Which car has more power?
The Toyota 86 Aero produces more power with 200 PS versus the Ford Ranger's 170 PS, though the Ford generates significantly more torque at 405 Nm.
Which vehicle is better for daily commuting or work?
The Ford Ranger is better for daily commuting and work due to its body-on-frame construction, 2+3 seating capacity, and pickup body type, whereas the Toyota 86 is a 2-door coupe with 2+2 seating.
Is the Toyota 86 available for purchase?
No, the Toyota 86 Aero 2.0 MT is currently not available, while the Ford Ranger 2.0L Turbo Wildtrak is available for immediate purchase.