Toyota 86 Aero 2.0 MT (White Pearl) (2015) vs Honda Civic RS Turbo CVT Sensing (2022)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Toyota 86 Aero 2.0 MT (White Pearl) (2015) vs Honda Civic RS Turbo CVT Sensing (2022) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Toyota 86 Aero 2.0 MT (White Pearl) (2015) Toyota ₱1,861,000 | Honda Civic RS Turbo CVT Sensing (2022) Honda ₱1,790,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2015 | 2022 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 3-years/100,000 km |
| Availability | Not available | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Flat-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 1998cc | 1498cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-valve | DOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Naturally Aspirated | Turbocharged |
| Fuel Type | Gas | Gasoline |
| Max Power | 200 PS @ 7000 rpm | 178 PS @ 6000 rpm |
| Max Torque | 205 Nm @ 6400-6600 rpm | 240 Nm @ 1700 - 4500 rpm |
| Transmission | 6-Speed A/T | CVT |
| Drivetrain | RWD | FWD |
| Compression Ratio | — | 10.3:1 |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Coupe | Family Sedan |
| Segment | S | Sedan |
| Construction | Unibody | Unibody |
| Doors | 2 | 4 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+2 | 2+3 |
| Length (mm) | 4255 | 4678 |
| Width (mm) | 1795 | 1802 |
| Height (mm) | 1285 | 1415 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2570 | 2735 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 1298 | 1337 |
| Exterior Colors | — | Ignite Red Metallic, Morning Mist Blue Metallic, Meteoroid Gray Metallic, Lunar Silver Metallic, Platinum White Pearl |
| Fuel Tank (L) | — | 47 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | MacPherson | MacPherson Strut w/ Coil Spring |
| Rear Suspension | Double Wishbone | Multi-Link w/ Coil Spring |
| Front Wheels | 17x7" Alloys | 18 |
| Rear Wheels | 17x7" Alloys | 18 |
| Front Tires | 215/45 R17 | 235/40/ZR18 |
| Rear Tires | 215/45 R17 | 235/40/ZR18 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Steering Column | tilt | Tilt & Telescopic |
| Steering Ratio | 5.4 | — |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | Yes |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Steering Type | — | EPS |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | No | Yes |
| Brake Assist | No | Yes |
| Parking Sensors | No | Yes |
| Stability Control | Yes | Yes |
| Traction Control | Yes | Yes |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | Yes |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | Yes |
| Hill Start Assist | No | Yes |
| Hill Descent Control | No | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Front Curtain Airbags | Yes | Yes |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | Yes | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | Yes | Yes |
| Engine Immobilizer | Yes | Yes |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Dual Zone Automatic Climate Control | Dual Zone Automatic Climate Control |
| Rear A/C Vents | No | Yes |
| Seat Material | Leather with Red Stitching | Leather-Suede |
| Parking Brake | Manual | EPB |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | Yes | Yes |
| Cruise Control | Yes | Yes |
| Multi-Info Display | No | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | Yes |
| Reverse Camera | No | Yes |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | No | Yes |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 6 | 12 |
| Touchscreen | No | Yes |
| Navigation | No | Yes |
| Bluetooth | No | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | No | Yes |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| AUX Input | Yes | No |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | No |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | No |
| iPod Support | No | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | HID | LED |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | Yes |
Toyota 86 Aero 2.0 MT (White Pearl) (2015) vs Honda Civic RS Turbo CVT Sensing (2022): which should you buy?
For the Filipino buyer prioritizing raw power and driving engagement, the 2015 Toyota 86 Aero 2.0 MT is the superior choice, delivering 200 PS compared to the Civic's 178 PS. However, the 2022 Honda Civic RS Turbo CVT Sensing offers better practicality with four doors versus the 86's two doors, and it is currently available for ₱1,790,000, which is ₱71,000 cheaper than the 86's ₱1,861,000 price tag. The 86 lacks a warranty and is not available for purchase, whereas the Civic comes with a 3-year/100,000km warranty and is available now. Ultimately, choose the 86 if you prioritize performance and a sporty coupe look, but select the Civic for daily commuting, family practicality, and immediate availability at a lower price.
Frequently asked questions
Which vehicle is cheaper?
The 2022 Honda Civic RS Turbo CVT Sensing is cheaper at ₱1,790,000 compared to the 2015 Toyota 86 Aero 2.0 MT which costs ₱1,861,000.
Which car has more power?
The 2015 Toyota 86 Aero 2.0 MT produces more power with 200 PS @ 7000 rpm, while the 2022 Honda Civic RS Turbo CVT Sensing generates 178 PS @ 6000 rpm.
Which car is better for daily commuting?
The 2022 Honda Civic RS Turbo CVT Sensing is better for daily commuting as it is a four-door family sedan, whereas the 2015 Toyota 86 Aero 2.0 MT is a two-door coupe.
Which car is available for purchase?
The 2022 Honda Civic RS Turbo CVT Sensing is currently available, while the 2015 Toyota 86 Aero 2.0 MT is not available.