Toyota 86 Aero 2.0 MT (White Pearl) (2015) vs Honda HR-V RS e:HEV E:CVT (2025)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Toyota 86 Aero 2.0 MT (White Pearl) (2015) vs Honda HR-V RS e:HEV E:CVT (2025) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Toyota 86 Aero 2.0 MT (White Pearl) (2015) Toyota ₱1,861,000 | Honda HR-V RS e:HEV E:CVT (2025) Honda ₱1,799,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2015 | 2025 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 3 years or 100,000 kms |
| Availability | Not available | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Flat-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 1998cc | 1498cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-valve | DOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Naturally Aspirated | Naturally Aspirated |
| Fuel Type | Gas | Hybrid |
| Max Power | 200 PS @ 7000 rpm | 129 PS |
| Max Torque | 205 Nm @ 6400-6600 rpm | 253 Nm |
| Transmission | 6-Speed A/T | Automatic |
| Drivetrain | RWD | FWD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Coupe | Small Crossover SUV |
| Segment | S | Crossover |
| Construction | Unibody | Unibody |
| Doors | 2 | 5 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+2 | 5 |
| Length (mm) | 4255 | 4355 |
| Width (mm) | 1795 | 1790 |
| Height (mm) | 1285 | 2028 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2570 | 2610 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 1298 | 1379 |
| Exterior Colors | — | Ignite Red Metallic, Crystal Black Pearl, Platinum White Pearl, Premium Silver, Meteoroid Gray Metallic |
| Fuel Tank (L) | — | 40 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | MacPherson | MacPherson Strut w/Coil Spring |
| Rear Suspension | Double Wishbone | Torsion beam |
| Front Wheels | 17x7" Alloys | 18 |
| Rear Wheels | 17x7" Alloys | 18 |
| Front Tires | 215/45 R17 | 225/50R18 |
| Rear Tires | 215/45 R17 | 225/50R18 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Steering Column | tilt | Tilt & Telescope |
| Steering Ratio | 5.4 | — |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | Yes |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Steering Type | — | EPS |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | No | Yes |
| Brake Assist | No | Yes |
| Parking Sensors | No | Yes |
| Stability Control | Yes | Yes |
| Traction Control | Yes | Yes |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | — |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | No | Yes |
| Hill Descent Control | No | Yes |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Front Curtain Airbags | Yes | Yes |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | Yes | Yes |
| Rear Side Airbags | Yes | Yes |
| Engine Immobilizer | Yes | Yes |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Dual Zone Automatic Climate Control | Automatic Climate Control Dual Zone |
| Rear A/C Vents | No | No |
| Seat Material | Leather with Red Stitching | Fabric |
| Parking Brake | Manual | EPB |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | Yes | No |
| Cruise Control | Yes | Yes |
| Multi-Info Display | No | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | Yes |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | No | Yes |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | no |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 6 | 6 |
| Touchscreen | No | Yes |
| Navigation | No | No |
| Bluetooth | No | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | No | Yes |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | No |
| AUX Input | Yes | No |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | No |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | No |
| iPod Support | No | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | HID | LED |
| Fog Lights | Yes | No |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | Yes |
Toyota 86 Aero 2.0 MT (White Pearl) (2015) vs Honda HR-V RS e:HEV E:CVT (2025): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer looking for an affordable and sporty coupe with good performance, the Toyota 86 Aero 2.0 MT is a strong contender. The Honda HR-V RS e:HEV offers more practicality in its crossover SUV form with hybrid technology, making it ideal for families or those who value fuel efficiency and space.
Frequently asked questions
Which vehicle should I choose if I prioritize performance over price?
The Toyota 86 Aero 2.0 MT is the better choice as it provides higher power output at 200 PS compared to the HR-V's 129 PS, making it more suitable for enthusiasts and those who enjoy driving dynamics.
Is the Honda HR-V RS e:HEV a good option for daily commuting?
The HR-V offers better practicality with its five doors and seating capacity for up to five passengers, which can be beneficial for daily commuting compared to the Toyota 86's two-seater design.
Which vehicle is more fuel-efficient?
Unfortunately, the data doesn't provide specific fuel economy figures. However, the HR-V RS e:HEV offers hybrid technology, suggesting it might have better fuel efficiency than the naturally aspirated engine of the Toyota 86 Aero 2.0 MT.
What's the warranty coverage for each vehicle?
Both vehicles offer a similar warranty period of 3 years or 100,000 kilometers, making them both reliable choices in terms of after-sales support.