Toyota 86 Aero 2.0 MT (White Pearl) (2015) vs Mitsubishi Destinator GT Turbo CVT (2026)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Toyota 86 Aero 2.0 MT (White Pearl) (2015) vs Mitsubishi Destinator GT Turbo CVT (2026) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Toyota 86 Aero 2.0 MT (White Pearl) (2015) Toyota ₱1,861,000 | Mitsubishi Destinator GT Turbo CVT (2026) Mitsubishi ₱1,929,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2015 | 2026 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 3 years or 100,000 kms |
| Availability | Not available | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Flat-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 1998cc | 1499cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-valve | DOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Naturally Aspirated | Turbocharged |
| Fuel Type | Gas | Gasoline |
| Max Power | 200 PS @ 7000 rpm | 163 PS |
| Max Torque | 205 Nm @ 6400-6600 rpm | 250 Nm |
| Transmission | 6-Speed A/T | CVT |
| Drivetrain | RWD | FWD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Coupe | Midsize Crossover SUV |
| Segment | S | MPV |
| Construction | Unibody | Unibody |
| Doors | 2 | 5 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+2 | 2+3+2 |
| Length (mm) | 4255 | 4680 |
| Width (mm) | 1795 | 1840 |
| Height (mm) | 1285 | 1780 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2570 | 2815 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 1298 | 1500 |
| Exterior Colors | — | Quartz White Pearl (Two-Tone w/Black Roof), Lunar Blue Mica (Two-Tone w/Black Roof), Blade Silver Metallic, Red Metallic, Jet Black Mica, Graphite Grey Metallic |
| Fuel Tank (L) | — | 45 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | MacPherson | MacPherson Strut w/ Coil Spring |
| Rear Suspension | Double Wishbone | Torsion beam w/Coil Spring |
| Front Wheels | 17x7" Alloys | 18 |
| Rear Wheels | 17x7" Alloys | 18 |
| Front Tires | 215/45 R17 | 225/55R18 |
| Rear Tires | 215/45 R17 | 225/55R18 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Steering Column | tilt | Tilt & Telescope |
| Steering Ratio | 5.4 | — |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Steering Type | — | EPS |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | No | No |
| Brake Assist | No | No |
| Parking Sensors | No | No |
| Stability Control | Yes | No |
| Traction Control | Yes | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | No | Yes |
| Hill Descent Control | No | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | No |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | No |
| Front Curtain Airbags | Yes | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | Yes | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | Yes | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | Yes | Yes |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Dual Zone Automatic Climate Control | Automatic Climate Control Dual Zone |
| Rear A/C Vents | No | No |
| Seat Material | Leather with Red Stitching | Leatherette |
| Parking Brake | Manual | EPB |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | Yes | No |
| Cruise Control | Yes | Yes |
| Multi-Info Display | No | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | No |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | No | Yes |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | Yes |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | no |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 6 | 8 |
| Touchscreen | No | Yes |
| Navigation | No | No |
| Bluetooth | No | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | No | Yes |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| AUX Input | Yes | No |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | No |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | No |
| iPod Support | No | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | HID | LED |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | Yes |
Toyota 86 Aero 2.0 MT (White Pearl) (2015) vs Mitsubishi Destinator GT Turbo CVT (2026): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer looking for performance and handling, the Toyota 86 Aero 2.0 MT is an excellent choice. It offers better power and practicality compared to the Mitsubishi Destinator GT Turbo CVT. The Toyota's naturally aspirated engine provides instant torque and top-end speed, making it ideal for enthusiasts and those who prioritize a sportier driving experience.
Frequently asked questions
Which car has more power?
The Toyota 86 Aero 2.0 MT has more power with 200 PS compared to the Mitsubishi Destinator GT Turbo CVT which has 163 PS.
Is one of these cars better for daily commuting?
While both are capable vehicles, the Toyota 86 is not as practical for daily commuting due to its smaller size and rear-wheel drive setup. The Mitsubishi Destinator GT Turbo is a midsize crossover SUV with more space and features suitable for family use.
Which car has better fuel efficiency?
Unfortunately, neither car's specifications include details on fuel economy. However, the naturally aspirated engine of the Toyota 86 may offer slightly better fuel efficiency compared to the turbocharged engine of the Mitsubishi Destinator GT Turbo.
Is one of these cars more affordable?
The Toyota 86 Aero 2.0 MT is cheaper at ₱1,861,000 compared to the Mitsubishi Destinator GT Turbo CVT which costs ₱1,929,000.