Toyota 86 Aero 2.0 MT (White Pearl) (2015) vs Nissan NV350 Urvan Urvan 2.5 CX A/T (2018)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Toyota 86 Aero 2.0 MT (White Pearl) (2015) vs Nissan NV350 Urvan Urvan 2.5 CX A/T (2018) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Toyota 86 Aero 2.0 MT (White Pearl) (2015) Toyota ₱1,861,000 | Nissan NV350 Urvan Urvan 2.5 CX A/T (2018) Nissan ₱1,880,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2015 | 2018 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 3 years or 100,000 kms |
| Availability | Not available | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Flat-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 1998cc | 2488cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-valve | 16 Valve |
| Aspiration | Naturally Aspirated | Turbocharged |
| Fuel Type | Gas | Diesel |
| Max Power | 200 PS @ 7000 rpm | 127 PS |
| Max Torque | 205 Nm @ 6400-6600 rpm | 356 Nm |
| Transmission | 6-Speed A/T | Automatic |
| Drivetrain | RWD | RWD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Coupe | Van |
| Segment | S | Van |
| Construction | Unibody | Body-on-frame |
| Doors | 2 | 4 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+2 | 15 |
| Length (mm) | 4255 | 5320 |
| Width (mm) | 1795 | 1880 |
| Height (mm) | 1285 | 2285 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2570 | 2940 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 1298 | 2190 |
| Exterior Colors | — | Gun Metallic, Brilliant Silver, Pearl White, Alpine White, Topaz Brown, Graphite Black |
| Fuel Tank (L) | — | 65 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | MacPherson | Upper and lower control arms |
| Rear Suspension | Double Wishbone | Rigid Leaf Spring |
| Front Wheels | 17x7" Alloys | 15 |
| Rear Wheels | 17x7" Alloys | 15 |
| Front Tires | 215/45 R17 | 195/80R15 |
| Rear Tires | 215/45 R17 | 195/80R15 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Disc | Drum |
| Steering Column | tilt | Tilt |
| Steering Ratio | 5.4 | — |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Steering Type | — | Hydraulic |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | No | Yes |
| Brake Assist | No | No |
| Parking Sensors | No | No |
| Stability Control | Yes | No |
| Traction Control | Yes | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | No | No |
| Hill Descent Control | No | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | No |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | No |
| Front Curtain Airbags | Yes | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | Yes | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | Yes | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | Yes | Yes |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Dual Zone Automatic Climate Control | Manual Airconditioning |
| Rear A/C Vents | No | No |
| Seat Material | Leather with Red Stitching | Fabric |
| Parking Brake | Manual | Mechanical |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | Yes | No |
| Cruise Control | Yes | No |
| Multi-Info Display | No | No |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | No |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | No |
| Power Seats | No | No |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | no |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 6 | 4 |
| Touchscreen | No | Yes |
| Navigation | No | No |
| Bluetooth | No | No |
| Apple CarPlay | No | No |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | No |
| AUX Input | Yes | No |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | No |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | No |
| iPod Support | No | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | HID | Halogen |
| Fog Lights | Yes | No |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | No |
Toyota 86 Aero 2.0 MT (White Pearl) (2015) vs Nissan NV350 Urvan Urvan 2.5 CX A/T (2018): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer looking for a compact sports car with good performance and reliability, the Toyota 86 Aero 2.0 MT is a superior choice. It offers more power, better fuel efficiency, and a higher resale value compared to the NV350 Urvan. The NV350, while available and practical for daily commuting, lacks in terms of performance and has less engine displacement and fewer colors.
Frequently asked questions
Which vehicle is cheaper between Toyota 86 Aero 2.0 MT and Nissan NV350 Urvan?
The Toyota 86 Aero 2.0 MT costs ₱1,861,000 compared to the Nissan NV350 Urvan at ₱1,880,000.
Which vehicle has better fuel efficiency and performance?
The Toyota 86 Aero 2.0 MT offers more power with a max torque of 205 Nm @ 6400-6600 rpm compared to the NV350 Urvan's max torque of 356 Nm.
Which vehicle is better for daily commuting?
The Nissan NV350 Urvan, with its RWD and automatic transmission, might be more practical for daily commuting due to its larger size and higher seating capacity.
What colors are available for the Toyota 86 Aero 2.0 MT?
The Toyota 86 Aero 2.0 MT is only available in White Pearl color.