Volkswagen Polo Hatch 1.6 MPI AT Comfortline (2015) vs Toyota Vios 1.3 E CVT (2016)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Volkswagen Polo Hatch 1.6 MPI AT Comfortline (2015) vs Toyota Vios 1.3 E CVT (2016) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Volkswagen Polo Hatch 1.6 MPI AT Comfortline (2015) Volkswagen ₱898,000 | Toyota Vios 1.3 E CVT (2016) Toyota ₱841,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2015 | 2016 |
| Warranty | Unlimited/2-years | 100,000km/3-years |
| Availability | Current | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 1598cc | 1329cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-valve | DOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Naturally Aspirated | Naturally Aspirated |
| Fuel Type | Gas | Gas |
| Max Power | 105 PS @ 5250rpm | 99 PS @ 6000 rpm |
| Max Torque | 153 Nm @ 3750rpm | 123 Nm @ 4400 rpm |
| Transmission | 6-AT | CVT |
| Drivetrain | FWD | FWD |
| Performance & Economy | ||
| 0–60 mph | no | — |
| 0–100 km/h | no | — |
| Top Speed | no | — |
| Fuel Economy (City) | no | — |
| Fuel Economy (Highway) | no | — |
| Fuel Economy (Combined) | no | — |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Hatchback | Sedan |
| Construction | Unibody | Unibody |
| Doors | 5 | 4 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3 | 2+3 |
| Length (mm) | 3970 | 4410 |
| Width (mm) | 1682 | 1700 |
| Height (mm) | 1462 | 1475 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2470 | 2550 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 1098 | — |
| Fuel Tank (L) | 55 | 42 |
| Segment | — | B |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | MacPherson w/ Stabilizer | MacPherson |
| Rear Suspension | Torsion Beam | Torsion Beam |
| Front Wheels | 15x6.0" Alloys | 15 |
| Rear Wheels | 15x6.0" Alloys | 15 |
| Front Tires | 185/60 R15 | 185/60 R15 |
| Rear Tires | 185/60 R15 | 185/60 R15 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Drum | Drum |
| Steering Type | Electromechanical Assist | Power |
| Steering Column | Tilt/Telescopic | Tilt |
| Steering Ratio | no | — |
| Turns Lock-to-Lock | no | — |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | Yes | Yes |
| Parking Sensors | Yes | No |
| Stability Control | No | No |
| Traction Control | No | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | No | No |
| Hill Descent Control | No | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | Yes | No |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Manual Aircon | Manual |
| Rear A/C Vents | No | Yes |
| Seat Material | Fabric | Fabric |
| Parking Brake | Manual | Manual |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | No | No |
| Cruise Control | No | No |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | No |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | No |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | No | No |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 4 | 4 |
| Touchscreen | No | Yes |
| Navigation | No | No |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | No | No |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| AUX Input | Yes | Yes |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | Yes |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | Yes |
| iPod Support | No | Yes |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | Halogen | Halogen |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | No |
Volkswagen Polo Hatch 1.6 MPI AT Comfortline (2015) vs Toyota Vios 1.3 E CVT (2016): which should you buy?
For those looking for a reliable and affordable option with good fuel economy, the Toyota Vios 1.3 E CVT is recommended over the Volkswagen Polo Hatch 1.6 MPI AT Comfortline. The Vios offers better value for money despite having lower power and torque figures but significantly more miles on warranty.
Frequently asked questions
Which car has a longer warranty?
The Toyota Vios comes with a warranty of up to 3 years or 100,000km compared to the Volkswagen Polo's unlimited/2-years warranty.
What is the difference in power between the two cars?
The Toyota Vios has a maximum power output of 99 PS at 6000 rpm while the Volkswagen Polo has 105 PS at 5250 rpm, indicating the Vios is slightly less powerful but still competitive.
Which car offers better fuel economy in city driving conditions?
Unfortunately, both cars do not provide specific fuel economy figures for city driving. However, CVT transmission may offer slight improvements in efficiency compared to a manual or automatic transmission like the Polo's 6AT.
Is one of these cars more suitable for daily commuting than the other?
The Toyota Vios is generally considered better suited for daily commuting due to its longer warranty period and comparable power output, making it a safer bet with fewer maintenance concerns.