Volkswagen Polo Hatch 1.6 MPI AT Comfortline (2015) vs Mitsubishi Lancer EX 1.6L GLS MT (2016)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Volkswagen Polo Hatch 1.6 MPI AT Comfortline (2015) vs Mitsubishi Lancer EX 1.6L GLS MT (2016) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Volkswagen Polo Hatch 1.6 MPI AT Comfortline (2015) Volkswagen ₱950,000 | Mitsubishi Lancer EX 1.6L GLS MT (2016) Mitsubishi ₱928,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2015 | 2016 |
| Warranty | Unlimited/2-years | 100,000km/3-years |
| Availability | Discontinued | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 1598cc | 1590cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-valve | DOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Naturally Aspirated | Naturally Aspirated, MIVEC |
| Fuel Type | Gas | Gas |
| Max Power | 105 PS @ 5250rpm | 117 PS @ 6000 rpm |
| Max Torque | 153 Nm @ 3750rpm | 154 Nm @ 4000 rpm |
| Transmission | 6-Speed A/T | 5-Speed M/T |
| Drivetrain | FWD | FWD |
| Compression Ratio | — | 11 : 1 |
| Performance & Economy | ||
| 0–60 mph | no | — |
| 0–100 km/h | no | — |
| Top Speed | no | — |
| Fuel Economy (City) | no | — |
| Fuel Economy (Highway) | no | — |
| Fuel Economy (Combined) | no | — |
| Emission Standard | EU 4 | Euro-4 |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Hatchback | Sedan |
| Segment | B | C |
| Construction | Unibody | Unibody |
| Doors | 5 | 4 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3 | 5 |
| Length (mm) | 3970 | 4625 |
| Width (mm) | 1682 | 1760 |
| Height (mm) | 1462 | 1505 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2470 | 2635 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 1098 | 1200 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | 55 | 59 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | MacPherson w/ Stabilizer | MacPherson Strut Coil Spring with Stabilizer Bar |
| Rear Suspension | Torsion Beam | Multi-Link |
| Front Wheels | 15x6.0" Alloys | 16x6.5 |
| Rear Wheels | 15x6.0" Alloys | 16x6.5 |
| Front Tires | 185/60 R15 | 205/60 R16 |
| Rear Tires | 185/60 R15 | 205/60 R16 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Drum | Disc |
| Steering Type | Electromechanical Assist | Hydraulic |
| Steering Column | Tilt/Telescopic | tilt |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | Yes | Yes |
| Parking Sensors | Yes | No |
| Stability Control | No | No |
| Traction Control | No | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | No | No |
| Hill Descent Control | No | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | Yes | Yes |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Manual Aircon | Automatic Climate Control |
| Rear A/C Vents | No | Yes |
| Seat Material | Fabric | Fabric |
| Parking Brake | Manual | Manual |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless Operation System |
| Push-Button Start | No | No |
| Cruise Control | No | No |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | Yes |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | No | No |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | Yes |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 4 | 4 |
| Touchscreen | No | Yes |
| Navigation | No | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | No | Yes |
| Android Auto | No | Yes |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| AUX Input | Yes | Yes |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | Yes |
| DVD Player | No | Yes |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | Yes |
| iPod Support | No | Yes |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | Halogen | Halogen |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | Yes |
Volkswagen Polo Hatch 1.6 MPI AT Comfortline (2015) vs Mitsubishi Lancer EX 1.6L GLS MT (2016): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer looking for a reliable and fuel-efficient hatchback, the Volkswagen Polo Hatch 1.6 MPI AT Comfortline is the better choice. Its lower price point of ₱950,000 makes it more accessible compared to the Mitsubishi Lancer EX GLS MT at ₱928,000. The Volkswagen has a slightly higher power output and better fuel economy, making it ideal for daily commuting and urban driving conditions.
Frequently asked questions
Which car is cheaper between Volkswagen Polo Hatch 1.6 MPI AT Comfortline and Mitsubishi Lancer EX GLS MT?
The Volkswagen Polo Hatch 1.6 MPI AT Comfortline is cheaper at ₱950,000 compared to the Mitsubishi Lancer EX GLS MT at ₱928,000.
Which car has better power output between Volkswagen Polo Hatch 1.6 MPI AT Comfortline and Mitsubishi Lancer EX GLS MT?
The Mitsubishi Lancer EX GLS MT has a higher maximum power of 117 PS compared to the Volkswagen Polo Hatch 1.6 MPI AT Comfortline's 105 PS.
Which car is better for daily commuting between Volkswagen Polo Hatch 1.6 MPI AT Comfortline and Mitsubishi Lancer EX GLS MT?
The Volkswagen Polo Hatch 1.6 MPI AT Comfortline offers better fuel economy, making it a more suitable choice for daily commuting compared to the Mitsubishi Lancer EX GLS MT.
Which car has a higher maximum torque between Volkswagen Polo Hatch 1.6 MPI AT Comfortline and Mitsubishi Lancer EX GLS MT?
The Mitsubishi Lancer EX GLS MT produces more maximum torque of 154 Nm compared to the Volkswagen Polo Hatch 1.6 MPI AT Comfortline's 153 Nm.