Volkswagen Polo Notch 1.6 MPI AT Trendline (2015) vs Toyota Vios 1.3 E CVT (2016)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Volkswagen Polo Notch 1.6 MPI AT Trendline (2015) vs Toyota Vios 1.3 E CVT (2016) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Volkswagen Polo Notch 1.6 MPI AT Trendline (2015) Volkswagen ₱840,000 | Toyota Vios 1.3 E CVT (2016) Toyota ₱841,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2015 | 2016 |
| Warranty | Unlimited/2-years | 100,000km/3-years |
| Availability | Current | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 1598cc | 1329cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-valve | DOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Naturally Aspirated | Naturally Aspirated |
| Fuel Type | Gas | Gas |
| Max Power | 105 PS @ 5250rpm | 99 PS @ 6000 rpm |
| Max Torque | 153 Nm @ 3750rpm | 123 Nm @ 4400 rpm |
| Transmission | 6-AT | CVT |
| Drivetrain | FWD | FWD |
| Performance & Economy | ||
| 0–60 mph | no | — |
| 0–100 km/h | no | — |
| Top Speed | no | — |
| Fuel Economy (City) | no | — |
| Fuel Economy (Highway) | no | — |
| Fuel Economy (Combined) | no | — |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
| Construction | Unibody | Unibody |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3 | 2+3 |
| Length (mm) | 4384 | 4410 |
| Width (mm) | 1699 | 1700 |
| Height (mm) | 1466 | 1475 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2552 | 2550 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 1157 | — |
| Fuel Tank (L) | 55 | 42 |
| Segment | — | B |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | MacPherson w/ Stabilizer | MacPherson |
| Rear Suspension | Torsion Beam w/ Stabilizer | Torsion Beam |
| Front Wheels | 15x6.0" Alloys | 15 |
| Rear Wheels | 15x6.0" Alloys | 15 |
| Front Tires | 185/60 R15 | 185/60 R15 |
| Rear Tires | 185/60 R15 | 185/60 R15 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Drum | Drum |
| Steering Type | Electromechanical Assist | Power |
| Steering Column | Tilt/Telescopic | Tilt |
| Steering Ratio | no | — |
| Turns Lock-to-Lock | no | — |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | Yes | Yes |
| Parking Sensors | No | No |
| Stability Control | No | No |
| Traction Control | No | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | No | No |
| Hill Descent Control | No | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | Yes | No |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Manual Aircon | Manual |
| Rear A/C Vents | No | Yes |
| Seat Material | Fabric | Fabric |
| Parking Brake | Manual | Manual |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | No | No |
| Cruise Control | No | No |
| Multi-Info Display | No | No |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | No |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | No | No |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 4 | 4 |
| Touchscreen | No | Yes |
| Navigation | No | No |
| Bluetooth | No | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | No | No |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| AUX Input | Yes | Yes |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | Yes |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | Yes |
| iPod Support | No | Yes |
| SD Card Slot | Yes | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | Halogen | Halogen |
| Fog Lights | No | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | No |
Volkswagen Polo Notch 1.6 MPI AT Trendline (2015) vs Toyota Vios 1.3 E CVT (2016): which should you buy?
Both the Volkswagen Polo Notch 1.6 MPI AT Trendline (2015) and the Toyota Vios 1.3 E CVT (2016) are priced almost identically, with the Polo at ₱840,000 and the Vios at ₱841,000. The Polo offers a larger 1598cc inline‑4 engine that delivers 105 PS at 5250 rpm and 153 Nm of torque at 3750 rpm, whereas the Vios’s smaller 1329cc engine produces 99 PS at 6000 rpm and 123 Nm at 4400 rpm. Thus, the Polo has a clear power advantage and a higher torque figure, which translates to better acceleration and more usable low‑end grunt for city driving or occasional highway use. In terms of drivetrain, both are front‑wheel drive and share a similar layout; the Polo uses a 6‑speed automatic (AT) while the Vios employs a continuously variable transmission (CVT), which may offer smoother acceleration but potentially less engaging driving dynamics. The Vios provides more interior space, with a 4‑door sedan body and seating for five (2+3), whereas the Polo’s door count is not specified, implying a smaller cabin likely suited for four occupants. Warranty coverage differs: the Polo offers an unlimited/2‑year plan, whereas the Vios guarantees 100,000 km or 3 years. For buyers prioritizing power and a slightly better torque curve in a compact package, the Polo is preferable. Those who need more passenger space and a longer warranty period may lean toward the Vios, despite its marginally lower performance figures. Both vehicles are current and available, so choice hinges on the trade‑off between power versus practicality.
Frequently asked questions
Which car is cheaper?
Both cars are priced almost the same: the Polo is ₱840,000 and the Vios is ₱841,000.
Which car has more power?
The Polo’s 1598cc engine produces 105 PS, while the Vios’s 1329cc engine produces 99 PS, so the Polo is more powerful.
Which car offers better torque?
The Polo delivers 153 Nm of torque, compared to the Vios’s 123 Nm.
Which car has more passenger space?
The Vios is a 4‑door sedan that seats five (2+3), whereas the Polo’s door count and seating are not specified, implying a smaller cabin.