Volkswagen Polo Notch 1.6 MPI AT Trendline (2015) vs Toyota Vios 1.3 E CVT (2016)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Volkswagen Polo Notch 1.6 MPI AT Trendline (2015) vs Toyota Vios 1.3 E CVT (2016) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Volkswagen Polo Notch 1.6 MPI AT Trendline (2015) Volkswagen ₱840,000 | Toyota Vios 1.3 E CVT (2016) Toyota ₱841,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2015 | 2016 |
| Warranty | Unlimited/2-years | 100,000km/3-years |
| Availability | Discontinued | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 1598cc | 1329cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-valve | DOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Naturally Aspirated | Naturally Aspirated |
| Fuel Type | Gas | Gas |
| Max Power | 105 PS @ 5250rpm | 99 PS @ 6000 rpm |
| Max Torque | 153 Nm @ 3750rpm | 123 Nm @ 4400 rpm |
| Transmission | 6-Speed A/T | CVT |
| Drivetrain | FWD | FWD |
| Performance & Economy | ||
| 0–60 mph | no | — |
| 0–100 km/h | no | — |
| Top Speed | no | — |
| Fuel Economy (City) | no | — |
| Fuel Economy (Highway) | no | — |
| Fuel Economy (Combined) | no | — |
| Emission Standard | EU 4 | — |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
| Segment | B | B |
| Construction | Unibody | Unibody |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3 | 2+3 |
| Length (mm) | 4384 | 4410 |
| Width (mm) | 1699 | 1700 |
| Height (mm) | 1466 | 1475 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2552 | 2550 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 1157 | — |
| Fuel Tank (L) | 55 | 42 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | MacPherson w/ Stabilizer | MacPherson |
| Rear Suspension | Torsion Beam w/ Stabilizer | Torsion Beam |
| Front Wheels | 15x6.0" Alloys | 15 |
| Rear Wheels | 15x6.0" Alloys | 15 |
| Front Tires | 185/60 R15 | 185/60 R15 |
| Rear Tires | 185/60 R15 | 185/60 R15 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Drum | Drum |
| Steering Type | Electromechanical Assist | Power |
| Steering Column | Tilt/Telescopic | Tilt |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | Yes | Yes |
| Parking Sensors | No | No |
| Stability Control | No | No |
| Traction Control | No | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | No | No |
| Hill Descent Control | No | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | Yes | No |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Manual Aircon | Manual |
| Rear A/C Vents | No | Yes |
| Seat Material | Fabric | Fabric |
| Parking Brake | Manual | Manual |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | No | No |
| Cruise Control | No | No |
| Multi-Info Display | No | No |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | No |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | No | No |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 4 | 4 |
| Touchscreen | No | Yes |
| Navigation | No | No |
| Bluetooth | No | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | No | No |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| AUX Input | Yes | Yes |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | Yes |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | Yes |
| iPod Support | No | Yes |
| SD Card Slot | Yes | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | Halogen | Halogen |
| Fog Lights | No | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | No |
Volkswagen Polo Notch 1.6 MPI AT Trendline (2015) vs Toyota Vios 1.3 E CVT (2016): which should you buy?
Both the 2015 Volkswagen Polo Notch 1.6 MPI AT Trendline and the 2016 Toyota Vios 1.3 E CVT are priced almost identically, at roughly ₱840,000‑₱841,000, so cost is not a deciding factor. The Polo packs a larger 1.6‑litre engine that delivers 105 PS and 153 Nm, giving it a clear edge in power over the Vios’ 1.3‑litre unit with 99 PS and 123 Nm. If you value a more spirited drive or need extra torque for overtaking, the Polo is the better choice. However, the Vios benefits from a current‑model status, a three‑year/100,000 km warranty, and a CVT that generally offers smoother city cruising and better fuel efficiency, even though exact economy figures are not provided. The Polo’s warranty is listed as “Unlimited/2‑years,” which is ambiguous and may not be as reassuring as the Vios’ clear warranty terms. Practicality-wise, the Vios is a four‑door sedan with a 4,410 mm length, suitable for families needing rear‑seat access, while the Polo’s body style isn’t specified but is likely a hatchback, which may offer more cargo flexibility but fewer rear doors. For buyers who prioritize power and a potentially sportier feel and don’t mind a discontinued model, the Polo is recommended. For those who want a newer, warranty‑backed sedan with smoother CVT operation for daily commuting, the Vios is the safer pick.
Frequently asked questions
Which car is cheaper?
Both vehicles are priced almost the same, with the Polo at ₱840,000 and the Vios at ₱841,000.
Which model offers more power?
The Polo’s 1.6‑litre engine produces 105 PS and 153 Nm, while the Vios’ 1.3‑litre engine makes 99 PS and 123 Nm, so the Polo is more powerful.
What are the warranty differences?
The Vios comes with a clear 100,000 km or 3‑year warranty, whereas the Polo’s warranty is listed as “Unlimited/2‑years,” which is less specific.
Which car is better for daily commuting?
The Vios, being a current‑model sedan with a CVT that typically provides smoother city driving, is better suited for everyday commuting, especially for families needing rear‑seat access.