Audi Q3 1.4 TFSI (2016) vs Mini Aceman SE (2025)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Audi Q3 1.4 TFSI (2016) vs Mini Aceman SE (2025) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Audi Q3 1.4 TFSI (2016) Audi ₱3,190,000 | Mini Aceman SE (2025) Mini ₱3,550,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2016 | 2025 |
| Warranty | Unlimited/2-years | 3 years or 100,000 kms |
| Availability | Current | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Electric Motor |
| Displacement | 1395cc | — |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-valve | — |
| Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | — |
| Aspiration | Turbocharged | — |
| Fuel Type | Gas | Electric |
| Max Power | 150 PS @ 5000-6000rpm | 215 PS |
| Max Torque | 250 Nm@ 1500-3500 rpm | 330 Nm |
| Transmission | 6-Speed DCT | Automatic |
| Drivetrain | FWD | FWD |
| Performance & Economy | ||
| 0–60 mph | 8.9 seconds | — |
| Top Speed | 204 km/h | — |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Crossover | Small Crossover SUV |
| Segment | J | Hatchback |
| Construction | Unibody | Unibody |
| Doors | 5 | 3 |
| Seating Capacity | 5 | 2+2 |
| Length (mm) | 4388 | 4079 |
| Width (mm) | 1831 | 1754 |
| Height (mm) | 1590 | 1514 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2603 | 2606 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 1405 | 1710 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | 64 | — |
| Exterior Colors | — | Orange |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | McPherson struts with aluminum lower wishbones, steel pivot bearings, aluminum subframe, tubular anti-roll bar, track-stabilizing steering roll | MacPherson Strut w/ Coil Spring |
| Rear Suspension | Four-link with separate spring/shock absorber arrangement, subframe, aluminum wheel carriers, tubular anti-roll bar | Multi-link with Coil Spring |
| Front Wheels | 17" alloy | 19 |
| Rear Wheels | 17" alloy | 19 |
| Front Tires | 235/55 R17 | 255/45R19 |
| Rear Tires | 235/55 R17 | 255/45R19 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Steering Type | EPS | EPS |
| Steering Column | Electromechanical | Tilt & Telescope |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | Yes |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | Yes | No |
| Parking Sensors | Yes | Yes |
| Stability Control | Yes | Yes |
| Traction Control | Yes | Yes |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | Yes | — |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | No | No |
| Hill Descent Control | Yes | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Front Curtain Airbags | Yes | Yes |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | Yes | Yes |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | Yes |
| Engine Immobilizer | Yes | Yes |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Dual-Zone Auto Climate Control | Automatic Climate Control |
| Rear A/C Vents | Yes | Yes |
| Seat Material | Leather | Leather |
| Parking Brake | Electric | EPB |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | No | Yes |
| Cruise Control | No | Yes |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | Yes | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | Yes |
| Auto Headlights | Yes | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | Yes | Yes |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | — |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 13 | 6 |
| Touchscreen | No | Yes |
| Navigation | No | No |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | No | Yes |
| Android Auto | No | Yes |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| AUX Input | Yes | No |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | No |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | No |
| iPod Support | Yes | No |
| SD Card Slot | Yes | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | Bi-Xenon | LED |
| Fog Lights | Yes | No |
| Daytime Running Lights | Yes | Yes |
Audi Q3 1.4 TFSI (2016) vs Mini Aceman SE (2025): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer looking for an entry-level crossover with good power-to-price ratio and practicality, the Audi Q3 is recommended over the Mini Aceman SE. The Audi offers more power, better fuel efficiency, and a longer warranty at a competitive price of ₱3,190,000. For those who prioritize electric propulsion and want to avoid gasoline expenses, the Mini Aceman SE with its 215 PS motor is a viable option, priced slightly higher at ₱3,550,000 but offering an all-electric driving experience.
Frequently asked questions
Which car has better fuel efficiency?
The Audi Q3 offers better fuel efficiency as it uses gas while the Mini Aceman SE runs on electric power.
Is one of these cars more powerful than the other?
Yes, the Mini Aceman SE is significantly more powerful with 215 PS compared to the Audi Q3's 150 PS.
Which car is better for daily commuting?
The Audi Q3 might be a better choice for daily commuting due to its higher power output and possibly better fuel efficiency, which could save on gas costs over time.
What colors are available for the Mini Aceman SE?
The only exterior color available for the Mini Aceman SE is Orange.