Audi TT 2.0 TFSI Coupe S-Line (2016) vs Hyundai IONIQ 9 Calligraphy AWD Long Range (2026)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Audi TT 2.0 TFSI Coupe S-Line (2016) vs Hyundai IONIQ 9 Calligraphy AWD Long Range (2026) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Audi TT 2.0 TFSI Coupe S-Line (2016) Audi ₱4,900,000 | Hyundai IONIQ 9 Calligraphy AWD Long Range (2026) Hyundai ₱4,580,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2016 | 2026 |
| Warranty | Unlimited/2-years | 5-years/200,000km |
| Availability | Discontinued | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Electric Motor |
| Displacement | 1984cc | — |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-valve | — |
| Aspiration | Turbocharged | — |
| Fuel Type | Gas | Electric |
| Max Power | 230 PS @ 4500-6200 rpm | 304 PS |
| Max Torque | 370 Nm @ 1600-4300 rpm | 608 Nm |
| Transmission | 6-Speed DCT | Automatic |
| Drivetrain | FWD | AWD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Coupe | Large Crossover SUV |
| Segment | S | Crossover |
| Construction | Space Frame | Unibody |
| Doors | 2 | 5 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+2 | 2+2+3 |
| Length (mm) | 4178 | 5060 |
| Width (mm) | 1842 | 1980 |
| Height (mm) | 1352 | 1790 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2468 | 3130 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 1305 | 2505 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | 50 | — |
| Exterior Colors | — | Serenity White, Abyss Black, Biophilic Blue, Nocturne Grey, Ionosphere Green, Celadon Grey |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | MacPherson | MacPherson Strut w/Coil Spring |
| Rear Suspension | 4-Link | Multi-link with Coil Spring |
| Front Wheels | 16 Alloy | 21 |
| Rear Wheels | 16 Alloy | 21 |
| Front Tires | 225/55 R16 | 285/45R21 |
| Rear Tires | 225/55 R16 | 285/45R21 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Steering Type | Hydraulic | EPS |
| Steering Column | Height Adjust | Tilt & Telescope |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | Yes | Yes |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | Yes | No |
| Parking Sensors | Yes | Yes |
| Stability Control | Yes | Yes |
| Traction Control | Yes | Yes |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | — |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | No | No |
| Hill Descent Control | No | Yes |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Knee Airbag | Yes | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Front Curtain Airbags | Yes | Yes |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | Yes | Yes |
| Rear Side Airbags | Yes | Yes |
| Engine Immobilizer | Yes | Yes |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Auto Climate Control System | Automatic Climate Control Dual Zone |
| Rear A/C Vents | No | Yes |
| Seat Material | Leather | Leather |
| Parking Brake | Manual | EPB |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | No | Yes |
| Cruise Control | No | Yes |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | Yes |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | Yes | Yes |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | Yes |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 16 | 14 |
| Touchscreen | Yes | Yes |
| Navigation | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | No | Yes |
| Android Auto | No | Yes |
| USB | Yes | No |
| AUX Input | Yes | No |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | No |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | No |
| iPod Support | Yes | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | LED | LED |
| Fog Lights | Yes | No |
| Daytime Running Lights | Yes | Yes |
Audi TT 2.0 TFSI Coupe S-Line (2016) vs Hyundai IONIQ 9 Calligraphy AWD Long Range (2026): which should you buy?
The Hyundai IONIQ 9 Calligraphy AWD Long Range is the clear winner for most Filipino buyers. Priced ₱320,000 lower than the Audi TT, it offers significantly more power (304 PS vs 230 PS) and torque (608 Nm vs 370 Nm), a current 2026 model with a 5-year/200,000km warranty versus a discontinued 2016 Audi with only 2 years unlimited. The IONIQ 9 is a large electric SUV with seating for 7, AWD, and a spacious 5060mm length, making it far more practical for families and daily commuting. The Audi TT is a 2+2 coupe with a turbo gas engine, 6-speed DCT, and sporty space frame construction, but its 4.9M price, lack of warranty support, and limited practicality (2 doors, small rear seats) relegate it to a niche choice for enthusiasts seeking a used sports car. For nearly all buyers—especially those prioritizing value, power, space, and modern features—the IONIQ 9 is the superior pick.
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper?
The Hyundai IONIQ 9 is cheaper at ₱4,580,000 versus the Audi TT at ₱4,900,000, a difference of ₱320,000.
Which is more powerful?
The Hyundai IONIQ 9 has more power with 304 PS output compared to the Audi TT's 230 PS, and also more torque (608 Nm vs 370 Nm).
Which is better for daily commuting?
The Hyundai IONIQ 9 is better for daily commuting due to its electric motor (lower running costs), larger cabin, 5 doors, and comfortable SUV ride, while the Audi TT is a 2-door coupe with limited practicality.
Which has a longer warranty?
The Hyundai IONIQ 9 offers a 5-year/200,000km warranty, while the Audi TT only has a 2-year unlimited warranty and is already discontinued, meaning no manufacturer support.