Audi TT 2.0 TFSI S-tronic DCT (2016) vs Hyundai IONIQ 5 GLS 2WD Long Range (2026)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Audi TT 2.0 TFSI S-tronic DCT (2016) vs Hyundai IONIQ 5 GLS 2WD Long Range (2026) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Audi TT 2.0 TFSI S-tronic DCT (2016) Audi ₱4,400,000 | Hyundai IONIQ 5 GLS 2WD Long Range (2026) Hyundai ₱3,698,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2016 | 2026 |
| Warranty | Unlimited/2-years | 5-years/200,000km |
| Availability | Discontinued | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Electric Motor |
| Displacement | 1984cc | — |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-valve | — |
| Aspiration | Turbo Intercooler Direct Injection | — |
| Fuel Type | Gas | Electric |
| Max Power | 200 PS @ 5100-6000 rpm | 229 PS |
| Max Torque | 280 Nm @ 1800-5000 rpm | 350 Nm |
| Transmission | 6-Speed DCT | Automatic |
| Drivetrain | FWD | RWD |
| Performance & Economy | ||
| 0–100 km/h | 6.9 seconds | — |
| Top Speed | 240 km/h | — |
| Fuel Economy (City) | 9.4 km/l | — |
| Fuel Economy (Highway) | 16.7 km/l | — |
| Fuel Economy (Combined) | 13.0 km/l | — |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Coupe | Midsize Crossover SUV |
| Segment | S | Crossover |
| Construction | Space Frame | Unibody |
| Doors | 2 | 5 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+2 | 2+3 |
| Length (mm) | 4178 | 4655 |
| Width (mm) | 1842 | 1800 |
| Height (mm) | 1352 | 1605 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2468 | 3000 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 1280 | 2005 |
| Exterior Colors | — | Lucid Blue, Abyss Black, Atlas White, Cyber Gray, Digital Teal, Gravity Gold, Matte Gold, Shooting Star Matte Gray |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | MacPherson | MacPherson Strut w/ Coil Spring |
| Rear Suspension | 4-Link | Multi-link with Coil Spring |
| Front Wheels | 16x7.5" Alloys | 20 |
| Rear Wheels | 16x7.5" Alloys | 20 |
| Front Tires | 225/55 R16 | 255/45R20 |
| Rear Tires | 225/55 R16 | 255/45R20 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Steering Type | Hydraulic | EPS |
| Steering Column | Height adjust | Tilt & Telescope |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | Yes |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | Yes | Yes |
| Parking Sensors | No | Yes |
| Stability Control | No | Yes |
| Traction Control | Yes | Yes |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | — |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | No | No |
| Hill Descent Control | No | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Knee Airbag | Yes | No |
| Passenger Airbag | No | Yes |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | Yes |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | Yes |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | Yes |
| Engine Immobilizer | No | Yes |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Automatic Climate Control | Automatic Climate Control |
| Rear A/C Vents | No | Yes |
| Seat Material | Leather | Leather |
| Parking Brake | Manual | EPB |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | No | Yes |
| Cruise Control | No | Yes |
| Multi-Info Display | No | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | Yes |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | No | Yes |
| Power Seats | No | Yes |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | no | — |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Touchscreen | Yes | Yes |
| Navigation | No | No |
| Bluetooth | No | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | No | Yes |
| Android Auto | No | Yes |
| USB | No | No |
| AUX Input | Yes | No |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | No |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | No |
| iPod Support | No | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Speakers | — | 8 |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | HID | LED |
| Fog Lights | Yes | No |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | Yes |
Audi TT 2.0 TFSI S-tronic DCT (2016) vs Hyundai IONIQ 5 GLS 2WD Long Range (2026): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer weighing performance, practicality and cost, the Hyundai IONIQ 5 GLS 2WD Long Range is the more compelling choice. It comes in at ₱3,698,000 versus the Audi TT’s ₱4,400,000, saving roughly ₱702,000. The IONIQ 5 offers a higher torque of 350 Nm compared to the TT’s 280 Nm, and its electric powertrain delivers a maximum of 229 PS, while the TT’s 200 PS is lower. The IONIQ 5’s RWD layout and midsize crossover body provide more interior space, 2+3 seating versus the TT’s coupe configuration with no seat‑count data, and a larger footprint (4655 mm length) that better suits families or cargo needs. The Audi’s 6‑speed DCT and FWD layout give a sporty feel, but its fuel economy is limited to 9.4 km/l city and 16.7 km/l highway, whereas the IONIQ 5’s electric range (not specified) eliminates fuel costs entirely. Warranty coverage also differs: the IONIQ 5 offers 5‑years/200,000 km, while the Audi’s warranty is unlimited but only for 2 years. For those prioritizing performance and a classic coupe aesthetic, the TT remains attractive; however, for everyday commuting, lower running costs, and more space, the IONIQ 5 is superior.
Frequently asked questions
Which vehicle is cheaper?
The Hyundai IONIQ 5 GLS 2WD Long Range costs ₱3,698,000, while the Audi TT 2.0 TFSI S‑tronic DCT (2016) is ₱4,400,000.
Which vehicle has more power?
The IONIQ 5 delivers 229 PS and 350 Nm torque, whereas the Audi TT provides 200 PS and 280 Nm.
Which vehicle is better for daily commuting?
The IONIQ 5’s electric motor eliminates fuel costs and offers a 5‑year/200,000 km warranty, making it more economical for daily use compared to the TT’s gasoline engine and 2‑year warranty.
Which vehicle offers more practicality?
The IONIQ 5 is a midsize crossover SUV with 2+3 seating and larger dimensions (4655 mm length), providing more space than the coupe‑style Audi TT.