Audi TT 2.0 TFSI S-tronic DCT (2016) vs Hyundai IONIQ 9 Calligraphy AWD Long Range (2026)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Audi TT 2.0 TFSI S-tronic DCT (2016) vs Hyundai IONIQ 9 Calligraphy AWD Long Range (2026) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Audi TT 2.0 TFSI S-tronic DCT (2016) Audi ₱4,400,000 | Hyundai IONIQ 9 Calligraphy AWD Long Range (2026) Hyundai ₱4,580,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2016 | 2026 |
| Warranty | Unlimited/2-years | 5-years/200,000km |
| Availability | Discontinued | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Electric Motor |
| Displacement | 1984cc | — |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-valve | — |
| Aspiration | Turbo Intercooler Direct Injection | — |
| Fuel Type | Gas | Electric |
| Max Power | 200 PS @ 5100-6000 rpm | 304 PS |
| Max Torque | 280 Nm @ 1800-5000 rpm | 608 Nm |
| Transmission | 6-Speed DCT | Automatic |
| Drivetrain | FWD | AWD |
| Performance & Economy | ||
| 0–100 km/h | 6.9 seconds | — |
| Top Speed | 240 km/h | — |
| Fuel Economy (City) | 9.4 km/l | — |
| Fuel Economy (Highway) | 16.7 km/l | — |
| Fuel Economy (Combined) | 13.0 km/l | — |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Coupe | Large Crossover SUV |
| Segment | S | Crossover |
| Construction | Space Frame | Unibody |
| Doors | 2 | 5 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+2 | 2+2+3 |
| Length (mm) | 4178 | 5060 |
| Width (mm) | 1842 | 1980 |
| Height (mm) | 1352 | 1790 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2468 | 3130 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 1280 | 2505 |
| Exterior Colors | — | Serenity White, Abyss Black, Biophilic Blue, Nocturne Grey, Ionosphere Green, Celadon Grey |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | MacPherson | MacPherson Strut w/Coil Spring |
| Rear Suspension | 4-Link | Multi-link with Coil Spring |
| Front Wheels | 16x7.5" Alloys | 21 |
| Rear Wheels | 16x7.5" Alloys | 21 |
| Front Tires | 225/55 R16 | 285/45R21 |
| Rear Tires | 225/55 R16 | 285/45R21 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Steering Type | Hydraulic | EPS |
| Steering Column | Height adjust | Tilt & Telescope |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | Yes |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | Yes | No |
| Parking Sensors | No | Yes |
| Stability Control | No | Yes |
| Traction Control | Yes | Yes |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | — |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | No | No |
| Hill Descent Control | No | Yes |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Knee Airbag | Yes | No |
| Passenger Airbag | No | Yes |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | Yes |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | Yes |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | Yes |
| Engine Immobilizer | No | Yes |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Automatic Climate Control | Automatic Climate Control Dual Zone |
| Rear A/C Vents | No | Yes |
| Seat Material | Leather | Leather |
| Parking Brake | Manual | EPB |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | No | Yes |
| Cruise Control | No | Yes |
| Multi-Info Display | No | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | Yes |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | No | Yes |
| Power Seats | No | Yes |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | Yes |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | no | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Touchscreen | Yes | Yes |
| Navigation | No | Yes |
| Bluetooth | No | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | No | Yes |
| Android Auto | No | Yes |
| USB | No | No |
| AUX Input | Yes | No |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | No |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | No |
| iPod Support | No | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Speakers | — | 14 |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | HID | LED |
| Fog Lights | Yes | No |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | Yes |
Audi TT 2.0 TFSI S-tronic DCT (2016) vs Hyundai IONIQ 9 Calligraphy AWD Long Range (2026): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer comparing the Audi TT 2.0 TFSI (2016) at ₱4.4M and the Hyundai IONIQ 9 Calligraphy AWD Long Range (2026) at ₱4.58M, the choice boils down to purpose and priorities. The Audi TT is a sporty coupe with a 200 PS turbo gas engine, 0-100 in 6.9s, and a top speed of 240 km/h, but it's discontinued, has a 2-year warranty, and offers limited practicality with 2+2 seating. Fuel economy is decent (9.4 city/16.7 highway km/l). The Hyundai IONIQ 9 is a brand-new large electric SUV with 304 PS and 608 Nm instant torque, AWD, seating for seven (2+2+3), and a 5-year/200,000 km warranty. It's more powerful, spacious, and future-proof, but costs ₱180k more. For daily commuting and family use, the Hyundai's electric powertrain, space, and warranty win. For driving enthusiasts who value a lightweight, agile coupe and don't mind an older model, the Audi TT offers a lower price and sporty character. However, the Hyundai is the more practical, powerful, and modern choice for most buyers.
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper?
The Audi TT is cheaper at ₱4,400,000 compared to the Hyundai IONIQ 9 at ₱4,580,000, a difference of ₱180,000.
Which is more powerful?
The Hyundai IONIQ 9 is more powerful with 304 PS and 608 Nm torque, versus the Audi TT's 200 PS and 280 Nm.
Which is better for daily commuting?
The Hyundai IONIQ 9 is better for daily commuting due to its electric powertrain, spacious 7-seat interior, and longer 5-year warranty, making it more practical and efficient for city driving.
Which has better warranty coverage?
The Hyundai IONIQ 9 offers a 5-year/200,000 km warranty, while the Audi TT has a 2-year unlimited mileage warranty, so Hyundai's coverage is longer and more comprehensive.