Chevrolet Sail 1.5 AT LTZ (2016) vs Mitsubishi Lancer EX 1.6L GLS MT (2016)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Chevrolet Sail 1.5 AT LTZ (2016) vs Mitsubishi Lancer EX 1.6L GLS MT (2016) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Chevrolet Sail 1.5 AT LTZ (2016) Chevrolet ₱917,888 | Mitsubishi Lancer EX 1.6L GLS MT (2016) Mitsubishi ₱928,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2016 | 2016 |
| Warranty | 100,000 km/3-years | 100,000km/3-years |
| Availability | Current | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 1485cc | 1590cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-valve | DOHC 16-valve |
| Compression Ratio | 10.2 | 11 : 1 |
| Aspiration | Naturally Aspirated | Naturally Aspirated, MIVEC |
| Fuel Type | Gas | Gas |
| Max Power | 109 PS @ 6000 rpm | 117 PS @ 6000 rpm |
| Max Torque | 141 Nm @ 4000 rpm | 154 Nm @ 4000 rpm |
| Transmission | 4-Speed AT | 5-Speed M/T |
| Drivetrain | FWD | FWD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
| Segment | B | C |
| Construction | Unibody | Unibody |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3 | 5 |
| Length (mm) | 4300 | 4625 |
| Width (mm) | 1735 | 1760 |
| Height (mm) | 1504 | 1505 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2499 | 2635 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | — | 1200 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | — | 59 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | MacPherson Strut-type and Stabilizer bar | MacPherson Strut Coil Spring with Stabilizer Bar |
| Rear Suspension | Rear Tosrion beam non-independent | Multi-Link |
| Front Wheels | 16 Aluminum | 16x6.5 |
| Rear Wheels | 16 Aluminum | 16x6.5 |
| Front Tires | 185/55 R16 | 205/60 R16 |
| Rear Tires | 185/55 R16 | 205/60 R16 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Drum | Disc |
| Steering Type | Hydraulic | Hydraulic |
| Steering Column | tilt | tilt |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | No | Yes |
| Parking Sensors | No | No |
| Stability Control | No | No |
| Traction Control | No | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | No | No |
| Hill Descent Control | No | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | No | Yes |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Auto Climate Control System | Automatic Climate Control |
| Rear A/C Vents | Yes | Yes |
| Seat Material | Fabric | Fabric |
| Parking Brake | Manual | Manual |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless Operation System |
| Push-Button Start | No | No |
| Cruise Control | No | No |
| Multi-Info Display | No | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | Yes | Yes |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | Yes | No |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | Yes |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 4 | 4 |
| Touchscreen | Yes | Yes |
| Navigation | No | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | No | Yes |
| Android Auto | Yes | Yes |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| AUX Input | Yes | Yes |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | Yes |
| DVD Player | No | Yes |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | Yes |
| iPod Support | Yes | Yes |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | Halogen | Halogen |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | Yes |
| Performance & Economy | ||
| Emission Standard | — | Euro-4 |
Chevrolet Sail 1.5 AT LTZ (2016) vs Mitsubishi Lancer EX 1.6L GLS MT (2016): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer prioritizing value and fuel economy, the Chevrolet Sail 1.5 AT LTZ is the superior choice. It offers a lower purchase price of ₱917,888 compared to the Mitsubishi Lancer EX 1.6L GLS MT's ₱928,000, saving the buyer ₱11,112. While both are unibody sedans, the Sail's 4-speed automatic transmission and 1485cc engine provide smoother daily commuting with slightly better fuel efficiency, whereas the Lancer EX's 1590cc engine with MIVEC technology delivers 8 PS more power (117 PS vs 109 PS) but requires a manual gearbox. The Lancer EX is positioned in the C-segment, suggesting a slightly larger footprint, while the Sail remains a B-segment sedan. Ultimately, choose the Sail for budget-conscious buyers seeking automatic ease, or the Lancer EX if you prefer a manual drive and a bit more horsepower.
Frequently asked questions
Which vehicle is cheaper?
The Chevrolet Sail 1.5 AT LTZ is ₱11,112 cheaper at ₱917,888 compared to the Mitsubishi Lancer EX 1.6L GLS MT priced at ₱928,000.
Which car has more power?
The Mitsubishi Lancer EX 1.6L GLS MT is more powerful with 117 PS, generating 8 PS more than the Chevrolet Sail 1.5 AT LTZ which produces 109 PS.
Which car is better for daily commuting in the Philippines?
The Chevrolet Sail 1.5 AT LTZ is generally better for daily commuting due to its 4-speed automatic transmission and slightly smaller 1485cc engine, which typically offers better fuel economy and smoother driving compared to the Lancer EX's manual transmission.
What are the key differences in engine specs?
The Chevrolet Sail uses a 1485cc inline-4 engine with a 10.2 compression ratio, while the Mitsubishi Lancer EX has a larger 1590cc inline-4 engine with a 11:1 compression ratio and includes MIVEC technology.