Honda CR-Z Hybrid IMA Navi MT (2016) vs Mitsubishi Xpander Cross 1.5 AT (2026)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Honda CR-Z Hybrid IMA Navi MT (2016) vs Mitsubishi Xpander Cross 1.5 AT (2026) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Honda CR-Z Hybrid IMA Navi MT (2016) Honda ₱1,440,000 | Mitsubishi Xpander Cross 1.5 AT (2026) Mitsubishi ₱1,378,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2016 | 2026 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 3-years/100,000 km |
| Availability | Discontinued | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 1496cc | 1459cc |
| Valvetrain | SOHC 16-valve i-VTEC | DOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Naturally Aspirated, Hybrid | Naturally Aspirated |
| Fuel Type | Gas/Electric | Gasoline |
| Max Power | 136 PS @ 6600 rpm | 105 PS |
| Max Torque | 171 Nm @ 4800 rpm | 141 Nm |
| Transmission | 6-Speed A/T | Automatic 4-Speed |
| Drivetrain | FWD | FWD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Coupe | MPV AUV |
| Segment | B | MPV |
| Construction | Unibody | Unibody |
| Doors | 3 | 5 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+2 | 2+3+2 |
| Length (mm) | 4301 | 4595 |
| Width (mm) | 1740 | 1790 |
| Height (mm) | 1395 | 1750 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2435 | 2775 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 1155 | 1275 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | 40 | 45 |
| Exterior Colors | — | Green Bronze Metallic With Black Roof. Quartz White Pearl With Black Roof, Sunrise Orange Metallic With Black Roof |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | MacPherson | MacPherson Strut w/Coil Spring |
| Rear Suspension | Torsion Beam | Torsion beam w/Coil Spring |
| Front Wheels | 17 Alloy | — |
| Rear Wheels | 17 Alloy | — |
| Front Tires | 205/45 R17 | 205/55R17 |
| Rear Tires | 205/45 R17 | 205/55R17 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Disc | Drum |
| Steering Column | Tilt & Telescopic | Tilt & Telescope |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Steering Type | — | EPS |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | Yes | No |
| Parking Sensors | Yes | No |
| Stability Control | Yes | No |
| Traction Control | Yes | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | Yes | Yes |
| Hill Descent Control | No | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | No |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | No |
| Front Curtain Airbags | Yes | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | Yes | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | Yes | Yes |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | keyless Auto | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Automatic Air Conditioning | Automatic Climate Control |
| Rear A/C Vents | No | No |
| Seat Material | Leather and Fabric | Leather |
| Parking Brake | Electronic | EPB |
| Key Type | keyless Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | Yes | No |
| Cruise Control | No | Yes |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | Yes | No |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | Yes | No |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | no |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 6-Speakers | 6 |
| Touchscreen | Yes | Yes |
| Navigation | Yes | No |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | Yes | Yes |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | No |
| AUX Input | Yes | No |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | No |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | No | No |
| iPod Support | Yes | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | LED | LED |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | Yes | Yes |
Honda CR-Z Hybrid IMA Navi MT (2016) vs Mitsubishi Xpander Cross 1.5 AT (2026): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer looking for a hybrid vehicle with advanced technology and features like navigation, the Honda CR-Z Hybrid IMA Navi MT is the better choice. It offers superior power and practicality compared to the Mitsubishi Xpander Cross 1.5 AT. The CR-Z has more displacement, higher max torque, and a more powerful engine, making it ideal for those who value performance and technology in their vehicle.
Frequently asked questions
Which vehicle is cheaper between Honda CR-Z Hybrid IMA Navi MT and Mitsubishi Xpander Cross 1.5 AT?
The Honda CR-Z Hybrid IMA Navi MT is cheaper at ₱1,440,000 compared to the Mitsubishi Xpander Cross 1.5 AT at ₱1,378,000.
Which vehicle has more power between Honda CR-Z Hybrid IMA Navi MT and Mitsubishi Xpander Cross 1.5 AT?
The Honda CR-Z Hybrid IMA Navi MT has more power with a max torque of 171 Nm compared to the Mitsubishi Xpander Cross 1.5 AT at 141 Nm.
Which vehicle is better for daily commuting between Honda CR-Z Hybrid IMA Navi MT and Mitsubishi Xpander Cross 1.5 AT?
The Honda CR-Z Hybrid IMA Navi MT is better suited for daily commuting due to its higher max torque of 171 Nm, which provides smoother acceleration and better handling.
Which vehicle has more doors between Honda CR-Z Hybrid IMA Navi MT and Mitsubishi Xpander Cross 1.5 AT?
The Mitsubishi Xpander Cross 1.5 AT has more doors with a total of 5 compared to the Honda CR-Z Hybrid IMA Navi MT with 3.