Mercedes-Benz AMG GT S (2016) vs Toyota Land Cruiser Prado 2.4 Turbo AT (2025)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Mercedes-Benz AMG GT S (2016) vs Toyota Land Cruiser Prado 2.4 Turbo AT (2025) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Mercedes-Benz AMG GT S (2016) Mercedes-Benz ₱13,980,000 | Toyota Land Cruiser Prado 2.4 Turbo AT (2025) Toyota ₱4,806,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2016 | 2025 |
| Warranty | Unlimited/2-years | 3-years/100,000km |
| Availability | Current | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | V8 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 3982cc | 2393cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 32-valve | DOHC 16-valve |
| Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | — |
| Aspiration | Twin Turbo | Turbocharged |
| Fuel Type | Gas | Gasoline |
| Max Power | 510 PS @ 6000-6500rpm | 281 PS @ 6000 rpm |
| Max Torque | 650 Nm @ 1750-5000 rpm | 430 Nm @ 1700 - 3600 rpm |
| Transmission | 7-Speed DCT | 8-A/T |
| Drivetrain | RWD | 4WD |
| Performance & Economy | ||
| 0–100 km/h | 3.8 seconds | — |
| Top Speed | 310 km/h | — |
| Fuel Economy (City) | 12.5l/100km | — |
| Fuel Economy (Highway) | 7.9l/100km | — |
| Fuel Economy (Combined) | 9.6l/100km | — |
| Emission Standard | Euro-6 | — |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Coupe | Large Crossover SUV |
| Segment | S | SUV |
| Construction | Unibody | Body-on-frame |
| Doors | 2 | 5 |
| Seating Capacity | 2 | 2+3+2 |
| Length (mm) | 4546 | 4925 |
| Width (mm) | 2075 | 1980 |
| Height (mm) | 1288 | 1935 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2630 | 2850 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 1645 | 2400 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | 65 | 110 |
| Front Headroom (mm) | 1003 | — |
| Exterior Colors | — | Black Mica, Pearl White Mica, Avant-Garde Bronze |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | Double Wishbone | Double Wishbone, Coil Spring |
| Rear Suspension | Double Wishbone | Multi-Link w/ Coil Spring |
| Front Wheels | 19” Alloys | 20 |
| Rear Wheels | 20” Alloys | 20 |
| Front Tires | 265/35 ZR 19 | 265/60/R20 |
| Rear Tires | 295/30 ZR 20 | 265/60/R20 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Steering Type | electronic | EPS |
| Steering Column | tilt/telescopic | Tilt + Telescopic |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | Yes | Yes |
| Differential Lock | No | Yes |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | Yes | No |
| Parking Sensors | Yes | No |
| Stability Control | Yes | No |
| Traction Control | Yes | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | Yes | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | Yes |
| Hill Start Assist | No | Yes |
| Hill Descent Control | No | Yes |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | No |
| Knee Airbag | Yes | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | No |
| Front Curtain Airbags | Yes | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | Yes | Yes |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Dual-Zone Automatic Climate Control | Dual Zone Automatic Climate Control |
| Rear A/C Vents | No | No |
| Seat Material | Leather | Leather |
| Parking Brake | Electronic | EPB |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | Yes | No |
| Cruise Control | Yes | Yes |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | Yes | No |
| Reverse Camera | Yes | No |
| Auto Headlights | Yes | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | Yes | Yes |
| Remote Trunk Release | Yes | Yes |
| Eco Mode | Yes | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 6 | 10 |
| Touchscreen | Yes | Yes |
| Navigation | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | No | Yes |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| AUX Input | Yes | No |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | No |
| DVD Player | Yes | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | No |
| iPod Support | Yes | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | LED | LED |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | Yes | Yes |
Mercedes-Benz AMG GT S (2016) vs Toyota Land Cruiser Prado 2.4 Turbo AT (2025): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer looking for a high-performance SUV with strong power and excellent fuel efficiency, the Mercedes-Benz AMG GT S is clearly superior to the Toyota Land Cruiser Prado 2.4 Turbo AT. The AMG GT S offers significantly more power (510 PS vs 281 PS), impressive acceleration capabilities (3.8 seconds to 100 km/h vs 7.6 seconds for Land Cruiser), and better fuel economy (9.6 l/100km combined vs 14.2 l/100km for Land Cruiser). However, the Toyota Land Cruiser Prado provides robust off-road capability and a more spacious interior, making it suitable for those who prioritize practicality over performance. For daily commuting or light off-roading, the Land Cruiser is likely to be more reliable and comfortable. Choose based on your specific needs and priorities.
Frequently asked questions
Which vehicle is cheaper?
The Toyota Land Cruiser Prado 2025 starts at ₱4,806,000 compared to the Mercedes-Benz AMG GT S which begins at ₱13,980,000.
Which vehicle has better acceleration?
The Mercedes-Benz AMG GT S accelerates faster with a 0-100 km/h time of 3.8 seconds compared to the Toyota Land Cruiser Prado's 7.6 seconds.
Which vehicle is more fuel efficient?
The Mercedes-Benz AMG GT S has better combined fuel economy at 9.6 l/100km, while the Toyota Land Cruiser Prado uses up to 14.2 liters per 100 kilometers in combined driving conditions.
Is one vehicle a better fit for daily commuting than the other?
The Toyota Land Cruiser Prado offers robust off-road capability and a more spacious interior, making it suitable for those prioritizing practicality over performance for daily commuting or light off-roading.