Mitsubishi Lancer EX 1.6L GLS MT (2016) vs Geely EX2 Pro (2026)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Mitsubishi Lancer EX 1.6L GLS MT (2016) vs Geely EX2 Pro (2026) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Mitsubishi Lancer EX 1.6L GLS MT (2016) Mitsubishi ₱928,000 | Geely EX2 Pro (2026) Geely ₱938,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2016 | 2026 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 6-years/150,000km |
| Availability | Current | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Electric Motor |
| Displacement | 1590cc | — |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-valve | — |
| Compression Ratio | 11 : 1 | — |
| Aspiration | Naturally Aspirated, MIVEC | — |
| Fuel Type | Gas | Electric |
| Max Power | 117 PS @ 6000 rpm | 113 PS |
| Max Torque | 154 Nm @ 4000 rpm | 150 Nm |
| Transmission | 5-Speed M/T | Automatic |
| Drivetrain | FWD | FWD |
| Performance & Economy | ||
| Emission Standard | Euro-4 | — |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Sedan | Small Crossover SUV |
| Segment | C | Crossover |
| Construction | Unibody | Unibody |
| Doors | 4 | 5 |
| Seating Capacity | 5 | 2+3 |
| Length (mm) | 4625 | 4135 |
| Width (mm) | 1760 | 1805 |
| Height (mm) | 1505 | 1570 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2635 | 2650 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 1200 | 1300 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | 59 | — |
| Exterior Colors | — | Moon White, Star Silver, Nebula Beige, Aurora green, Comet Gray |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | MacPherson Strut Coil Spring with Stabilizer Bar | MacPherson Strut w/Coil Spring |
| Rear Suspension | Multi-Link | Multi-link with Coil Spring |
| Front Wheels | 16x6.5 | 15 Steel |
| Rear Wheels | 16x6.5 | 15 Steel |
| Front Tires | 205/60 R16 | 205/65R15 |
| Rear Tires | 205/60 R16 | 205/65R15 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Steering Type | Hydraulic | EPS |
| Steering Column | tilt | Tilt & Telescope |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | Yes |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | Yes | Yes |
| Parking Sensors | No | Yes |
| Stability Control | No | Yes |
| Traction Control | No | Yes |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | Yes |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | No | Yes |
| Hill Descent Control | No | Yes |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | Yes |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | Yes | Yes |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Automatic Climate Control | Manual |
| Rear A/C Vents | Yes | Yes |
| Seat Material | Fabric | Leather |
| Parking Brake | Manual | EPS |
| Key Type | Keyless Operation System | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | No | Yes |
| Cruise Control | No | No |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | Yes | Yes |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | No | No |
| Remote Trunk Release | Yes | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | — |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 4 | 4 |
| Touchscreen | Yes | Yes |
| Navigation | Yes | No |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | Yes | Yes |
| Android Auto | Yes | Yes |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| AUX Input | Yes | No |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | No |
| DVD Player | Yes | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | No |
| iPod Support | Yes | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | Halogen | LED |
| Fog Lights | Yes | No |
| Daytime Running Lights | Yes | Yes |
Mitsubishi Lancer EX 1.6L GLS MT (2016) vs Geely EX2 Pro (2026): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer weighing cost, power, and practicality, the Mitsubishi Lancer EX 1.6L GLS MT (2016) edges out the Geely EX2 Pro despite being a conventional gasoline sedan. Both are priced similarly (₱928,000 vs ₱938,000), but the Lancer offers a slightly higher peak power (117 PS vs 113 PS) and torque (154 Nm vs 150 Nm), which translates to marginally better acceleration for city driving. Its 5‑speed manual transmission also appeals to drivers who prefer more control and potentially lower fuel consumption, whereas the Geely’s automatic electric drivetrain eliminates fuel costs but lacks the proven range and charging infrastructure in many Philippine areas. The Lancer’s proven 3‑year/100,000 km warranty is shorter than Geely’s 6‑year/150,000 km, yet the Lancer’s long‑standing reliability and simpler maintenance may offset the shorter coverage. Practicality favors the Lancer with a traditional 4‑door sedan layout, easier parking in tight Manila streets, and a familiar interior. The Geely EX2 Pro, a 5‑door small crossover, offers a higher roofline and 2+3 seating, which could suit small families needing a bit more cargo space, but its electric range and charging network are not specified, making daily commuting riskier. Overall, choose the Mitsubishi Lancer if you value proven performance, lower upfront complexity, and easier city maneuverability; opt for the Geely EX2 Pro only if you are ready for an electric vehicle and value the crossover form factor and longer warranty.
Frequently asked questions
Which model is cheaper?
The Mitsubishi Lancer EX 1.6L GLS MT is priced at ₱928,000, slightly cheaper than the Geely EX2 Pro at ₱938,000.
Which vehicle has more power?
The Lancer produces 117 PS, while the Geely EX2 Pro delivers 113 PS, giving the Lancer a modest power advantage.
Is the Geely’s warranty better?
Yes, the Geely offers a 6‑year/150,000 km warranty, compared to the Lancer’s 3‑year/100,000 km coverage.
Which car is more practical for daily commuting in the Philippines?
The Lancer’s compact 4‑door sedan size, manual transmission and proven gasoline engine make it more practical for typical city traffic and parking, whereas the Geely’s electric range and charging needs are not detailed, posing potential daily use challenges.