Mitsubishi Lancer EX 1.6L GLS MT (2016) vs Isuzu D-Max Single Cab RZ4E 4×2 M/T (2023)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Mitsubishi Lancer EX 1.6L GLS MT (2016) vs Isuzu D-Max Single Cab RZ4E 4×2 M/T (2023) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Mitsubishi Lancer EX 1.6L GLS MT (2016) Mitsubishi ₱928,000 | Isuzu D-Max Single Cab RZ4E 4×2 M/T (2023) Isuzu ₱978,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2016 | 2023 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 3 years or 100,000 kms |
| Availability | Current | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 1590cc | 1898cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-valve | 16 Valve |
| Compression Ratio | 11 : 1 | — |
| Aspiration | Naturally Aspirated, MIVEC | Turbocharged |
| Fuel Type | Gas | Diesel |
| Max Power | 117 PS @ 6000 rpm | 148 PS |
| Max Torque | 154 Nm @ 4000 rpm | 350 Nm |
| Transmission | 5-Speed M/T | Manual 6-Speed |
| Drivetrain | FWD | RWD |
| Performance & Economy | ||
| Emission Standard | Euro-4 | — |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Sedan | Pickup |
| Segment | C | Pickup |
| Construction | Unibody | Body-on-frame |
| Doors | 4 | 2 |
| Seating Capacity | 5 | 2 |
| Length (mm) | 4625 | 5020 |
| Width (mm) | 1760 | 1810 |
| Height (mm) | 1505 | 1700 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2635 | 3125 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 1200 | 1595 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | 59 | 76 |
| Exterior Colors | — | Onyx Black, Satin White Pearl, Splash White, Islay Gray, Biarritz Blue, Namibu Orange |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | MacPherson Strut Coil Spring with Stabilizer Bar | Double Wishbone w/ Coil Spring |
| Rear Suspension | Multi-Link | Leaf spring with shock absorber |
| Front Wheels | 16x6.5 | 15 |
| Rear Wheels | 16x6.5 | 15 |
| Front Tires | 205/60 R16 | 195/55R15 |
| Rear Tires | 205/60 R16 | 195/55R15 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Disc | Drum |
| Steering Type | Hydraulic | Hydraulic |
| Steering Column | tilt | — |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | Yes | No |
| Parking Sensors | No | No |
| Stability Control | No | No |
| Traction Control | No | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | No | No |
| Hill Descent Control | No | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | No |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | No |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | Yes | No |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Automatic Climate Control | Manual |
| Rear A/C Vents | Yes | No |
| Seat Material | Fabric | Fabric |
| Parking Brake | Manual | Manual |
| Key Type | Keyless Operation System | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | No | No |
| Cruise Control | No | No |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | No |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | Yes | No |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | No | No |
| Remote Trunk Release | Yes | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | no |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 4 | 2 |
| Touchscreen | Yes | No |
| Navigation | Yes | No |
| Bluetooth | Yes | No |
| Apple CarPlay | Yes | No |
| Android Auto | Yes | No |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| AUX Input | Yes | No |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | No |
| DVD Player | Yes | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | No |
| iPod Support | Yes | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | Halogen | Halogen |
| Fog Lights | Yes | No |
| Daytime Running Lights | Yes | No |
Mitsubishi Lancer EX 1.6L GLS MT (2016) vs Isuzu D-Max Single Cab RZ4E 4×2 M/T (2023): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer looking for a sedan with decent power and practicality, the Mitsubishi Lancer EX GLS MT is recommended. It offers better fuel efficiency and a more comfortable ride compared to the Isuzu D-Max. The Lancer's 1590cc inline-4 engine delivers 117 PS at 6000 rpm and 154 Nm of torque, making it suitable for daily commuting and urban driving. For those who prioritize power and a more rugged ride, the Isuzu D-Max is recommended due to its 1898cc inline-4 engine delivering 148 PS at 3200 rpm and 350 Nm of torque, ideal for towing and off-road conditions.
Frequently asked questions
Which car has better fuel efficiency?
The Mitsubishi Lancer EX GLS MT is generally more fuel efficient as it uses a naturally aspirated engine with lower power output compared to the Isuzu D-Max's turbocharged engine.
Is the Mitsubishi Lancer safer than the Isuzu D-Max?
The data provided does not include safety ratings or features. However, both cars are available in FWD and RWD configurations which can affect practicality depending on personal preference.
Which car is better for towing heavy loads?
The Isuzu D-Max with its 1898cc inline-4 engine delivering 350 Nm of torque is better suited for towing heavy loads compared to the Mitsubishi Lancer EX's 1590cc engine.
Which car has a longer warranty period?
Both cars offer warranties for 3 years or 100,000 kilometers, but the Isuzu D-Max RZ4E comes with an additional option of 6-speed manual transmission which is not available in the Mitsubishi Lancer EX GLS MT.