Mitsubishi Lancer EX 1.6L GLS MT (2016) vs Toyota Ativ 1.3 E M/T (2026)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Mitsubishi Lancer EX 1.6L GLS MT (2016) vs Toyota Ativ 1.3 E M/T (2026) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Mitsubishi Lancer EX 1.6L GLS MT (2016) Mitsubishi ₱928,000 | Toyota Ativ 1.3 E M/T (2026) Toyota ₱916,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2016 | 2026 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 5 years or 150,000 kms |
| Availability | Current | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 1590cc | 1329cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-valve | 16-valve |
| Compression Ratio | 11 : 1 | — |
| Aspiration | Naturally Aspirated, MIVEC | Naturally Aspirated |
| Fuel Type | Gas | Gasoline |
| Max Power | 117 PS @ 6000 rpm | 98 PS |
| Max Torque | 154 Nm @ 4000 rpm | 122 Nm |
| Transmission | 5-Speed M/T | Manual 5-Speed |
| Drivetrain | FWD | FWD |
| Performance & Economy | ||
| Emission Standard | Euro-4 | — |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Sedan | Family Sedan |
| Segment | C | FS |
| Construction | Unibody | Unibody |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seating Capacity | 5 | 2+3 |
| Length (mm) | 4625 | 4425 |
| Width (mm) | 1760 | 1740 |
| Height (mm) | 1505 | 1480 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2635 | 2620 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 1200 | 1030 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | 59 | 36 |
| Exterior Colors | — | Platinum White Pearl, Scarlet SE, Gray Metallic, Black Metallic Mica |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | MacPherson Strut Coil Spring with Stabilizer Bar | MacPherson Strut w/ Coil Spring |
| Rear Suspension | Multi-Link | Torsion beam w/Coil Spring |
| Front Wheels | 16x6.5 | 16 |
| Rear Wheels | 16x6.5 | 16 |
| Front Tires | 205/60 R16 | 195/60R16 |
| Rear Tires | 205/60 R16 | 195/60R16 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Disc | Drum |
| Steering Type | Hydraulic | EPS |
| Steering Column | tilt | Tilt & Telescope |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | Yes | Yes |
| Parking Sensors | No | No |
| Stability Control | No | Yes |
| Traction Control | No | Yes |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | — |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | No | No |
| Hill Descent Control | No | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | Yes | Yes |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Automatic Climate Control | Automatic Climate Control |
| Rear A/C Vents | Yes | No |
| Seat Material | Fabric | Fabric |
| Parking Brake | Manual | Manual |
| Key Type | Keyless Operation System | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | No | Yes |
| Cruise Control | No | No |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | Yes | Yes |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | No | No |
| Remote Trunk Release | Yes | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | — |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 4 | 4 |
| Touchscreen | Yes | Yes |
| Navigation | Yes | No |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | Yes | Yes |
| Android Auto | Yes | No |
| USB | Yes | No |
| AUX Input | Yes | No |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | No |
| DVD Player | Yes | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | No |
| iPod Support | Yes | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | Halogen | LED |
| Fog Lights | Yes | No |
| Daytime Running Lights | Yes | No |
Mitsubishi Lancer EX 1.6L GLS MT (2016) vs Toyota Ativ 1.3 E M/T (2026): which should you buy?
For the Filipino buyer, the Toyota Ativ 1.3 E M/T (2026) is the superior choice primarily due to its longer warranty coverage of 5 years or 150,000 kms compared to the Mitsubishi Lancer EX's 3-year limit. While the Lancer EX offers more power with 117 PS versus the Ativ's 98 PS, the Ativ is slightly cheaper at ₱916,000 against the Lancer's ₱928,000. The Ativ also benefits from a more modern segment classification (FS) and offers a wider selection of exterior colors, making it the better value for those prioritizing longevity and resale protection. However, the Lancer EX is ideal for buyers who strictly require higher performance and do not mind paying an extra ₱12,000 for a 2016 model year with a smaller engine displacement.
Frequently asked questions
Which vehicle is cheaper?
The Toyota Ativ 1.3 E M/T is cheaper at ₱916,000 compared to the Mitsubishi Lancer EX which is priced at ₱928,000.
Which car has more power?
The Mitsubishi Lancer EX is more powerful with 117 PS @ 6000 rpm, whereas the Toyota Ativ produces only 98 PS.
Which one has a better warranty?
The Toyota Ativ offers a better warranty with 5 years or 150,000 kms, significantly exceeding the Mitsubishi Lancer EX's coverage of 3 years or 100,000km.
Which is better for daily commuting in the Philippines?
The Toyota Ativ is generally better for daily commuting due to its newer 2026 model year, larger 1329cc displacement, and lower price point, offering better fuel efficiency and protection.