Mitsubishi Mirage 1.2 GLX CVT (2016) vs Ford Ranger Single Cab 2.2L 4×2 MT (2017)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Mitsubishi Mirage 1.2 GLX CVT (2016) vs Ford Ranger Single Cab 2.2L 4×2 MT (2017) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Mitsubishi Mirage 1.2 GLX CVT (2016) Mitsubishi ₱688,000 | Ford Ranger Single Cab 2.2L 4×2 MT (2017) Ford ₱780,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2016 | 2017 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 100,000km/3-years |
| Availability | Current | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-3 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 1193cc | 2198cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 12-valve | DOHC 16-valve |
| Compression Ratio | 10.5 : 1 | — |
| Aspiration | Naturally Aspirated | Turbocharged |
| Fuel Type | Gas | Diesel |
| Max Power | 78 PS @ 6000 rpm | 120 PS @ 3700 rpm |
| Max Torque | 100 Nm @ 4000 rpm | 285 Nm @ 1500-2500 rpm |
| Transmission | INVECS-III CVT | 5-Speed M/T |
| Drivetrain | FWD | RWD |
| Performance & Economy | ||
| Emission Standard | Euro-4 | — |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Hatchback | Pick-up |
| Segment | B | Pick-Up |
| Construction | Unibody | — |
| Doors | 5 | 2 |
| Seating Capacity | 5 | 2 |
| Length (mm) | 3795 | 5277 |
| Width (mm) | 1665 | 2163 |
| Height (mm) | 1500 | 1703 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2450 | 3220 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 845 | — |
| Fuel Tank (L) | 35 | 80 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | MacPherson Strut Coil Spring | Double Wishbone with Coil Spring |
| Rear Suspension | Torsion Beam | Leaf Spring |
| Front Wheels | 14x4.5 | 16'' Steel |
| Rear Wheels | 14x4.5 | 16'' Steel |
| Front Tires | 165/65 R14 | 215/70 R16 |
| Rear Tires | 165/65 R14 | 215/70 R16 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Drum | Drum |
| Steering Type | Electronic | Hydraulic |
| Steering Column | tilt | — |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | No |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | No |
| Brake Assist | No | No |
| Parking Sensors | No | No |
| Stability Control | No | No |
| Traction Control | No | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | No | No |
| Hill Descent Control | No | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | No | No |
| Security Alarm | Yes | No |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Standard |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Manual Aircon | Single Zone Automatic |
| Rear A/C Vents | Yes | Yes |
| Seat Material | Fabric | Vinyl |
| Parking Brake | Manual | Manual |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Standard Key |
| Push-Button Start | No | No |
| Cruise Control | No | No |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | No |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | No |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | No | No |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | Yes | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 4 | 2 |
| Touchscreen | Yes | No |
| Navigation | No | No |
| Bluetooth | Yes | No |
| Apple CarPlay | Yes | No |
| Android Auto | Yes | No |
| USB | Yes | No |
| AUX Input | Yes | Yes |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | No |
| DVD Player | Yes | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | No |
| iPod Support | Yes | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | Halogen | Halogen |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | No |
Mitsubishi Mirage 1.2 GLX CVT (2016) vs Ford Ranger Single Cab 2.2L 4×2 MT (2017): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer looking for a compact car with good fuel efficiency and reliability, the Mitsubishi Mirage GLX CVT is the better choice. It offers more power, better torque, and a more practical interior space compared to the Ford Ranger.
Here are some real questions buyers might ask:
Which is cheaper between the Mitsubishi Mirage and the Ford Ranger? The Mitsubishi Mirage costs ₱688,000 while the Ford Ranger is priced at ₱780,000. So, the Mitsubishi Mirage is slightly cheaper.
Which car has more power? The Mitsubishi Mirage GLX CVT produces 78 PS @ 6000 rpm, whereas the Ford Ranger delivers 120 PS @ 3700 rpm. Therefore, the Ford Ranger has more power.
Which vehicle is better for daily commuting? Given their respective sizes and fuel efficiency, the Mitsubishi Mirage GLX CVT with its FWD setup and Euro-4 emission standard might be more suitable for daily commuting due to its smaller size and better fuel economy.
Is the Ford Ranger a good option if I need a pickup truck for work or hauling heavy loads? The Ford Ranger is designed as a pick-up truck, ideal for towing and carrying heavier loads. However, it has fewer doors (2) compared to the Mitsubishi Mirage's 5, making it less convenient for daily commuting.
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper between the Mitsubishi Mirage and the Ford Ranger?
The Mitsubishi Mirage GLX CVT costs ₱688,000 while the Ford Ranger is priced at ₱780,000.
Which car has more power?
The Ford Ranger produces 120 PS @ 3700 rpm compared to the Mitsubishi Mirage's 78 PS @ 6000 rpm.
Which vehicle is better for daily commuting?
Given their respective sizes and fuel efficiency, the Mitsubishi Mirage GLX CVT with its FWD setup and Euro-4 emission standard might be more suitable for daily commuting due to its smaller size and better fuel economy.
Is the Ford Ranger a good option if I need a pickup truck for work or hauling heavy loads?
The Ford Ranger is designed as a pick-up truck, ideal for towing and carrying heavier loads. However, it has fewer doors (2) compared to the Mitsubishi Mirage's 5, making it less convenient for daily commuting.