Mitsubishi Mirage 1.2 GLX CVT (2016) vs Kia Picanto 1.2 MT (2018)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Mitsubishi Mirage 1.2 GLX CVT (2016) vs Kia Picanto 1.2 MT (2018) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Mitsubishi Mirage 1.2 GLX CVT (2016) Mitsubishi ₱688,000 | Kia Picanto 1.2 MT (2018) Kia ₱635,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2016 | 2018 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 100,000 km/3-years |
| Availability | Current | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-3 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 1193cc | 1248cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 12-valve | DOHC 16-valve |
| Compression Ratio | 10.5 : 1 | — |
| Aspiration | Naturally Aspirated | Natural aspirated |
| Fuel Type | Gas | Gas |
| Max Power | 78 PS @ 6000 rpm | 84 PS @ 6000 rpm |
| Max Torque | 100 Nm @ 4000 rpm | 122 Nm @ 4000 rpm |
| Transmission | INVECS-III CVT | 5-Speed M/T |
| Drivetrain | FWD | FWD |
| Performance & Economy | ||
| Emission Standard | Euro-4 | — |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Hatchback | Hatchback |
| Segment | B | B |
| Construction | Unibody | Unibody |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seating Capacity | 5 | 2+3 |
| Length (mm) | 3795 | 3595 |
| Width (mm) | 1665 | 1595 |
| Height (mm) | 1500 | 1485 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2450 | 2400 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 845 | 913 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | 35 | 35 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | MacPherson Strut Coil Spring | MacPherson Strut with Stabilizer + Coil Spring |
| Rear Suspension | Torsion Beam | Coupled Torsion Beam Axle + Coil Spring |
| Front Wheels | 14x4.5 | 15 Alloy |
| Rear Wheels | 14x4.5 | 15 Alloy |
| Front Tires | 165/65 R14 | 185/55 R15 |
| Rear Tires | 165/65 R14 | 185/55 R15 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Drum | Drum |
| Steering Type | Electronic | EPS |
| Steering Column | tilt | Tilt |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | No |
| Brake Assist | No | No |
| Parking Sensors | No | No |
| Stability Control | No | No |
| Traction Control | No | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | No | No |
| Hill Descent Control | No | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | No | No |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Manual Aircon | Manual Aircon |
| Rear A/C Vents | Yes | Yes |
| Seat Material | Fabric | Fabric |
| Parking Brake | Manual | Manual |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | No | No |
| Cruise Control | No | No |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | No |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | No |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | No | No |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | Yes | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 4 | 4 |
| Touchscreen | Yes | No |
| Navigation | No | No |
| Bluetooth | Yes | No |
| Apple CarPlay | Yes | No |
| Android Auto | Yes | No |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| AUX Input | Yes | Yes |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | Yes |
| DVD Player | Yes | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | Yes |
| iPod Support | Yes | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | Halogen | Halogen |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | Yes |
Mitsubishi Mirage 1.2 GLX CVT (2016) vs Kia Picanto 1.2 MT (2018): which should you buy?
Both the 2016 Mitsubishi Mirage 1.2 GLX CVT and the 2018 Kia Picanto 1.2 MT sit in the B‑segment hatchback class and share a three‑year/100,000‑km warranty, front‑wheel drive and unibody construction, making them suitable for city driving and first‑time owners. The Mirage is priced at ₱688,000, about ₱53,000 more than the Picanto’s ₱635,000, but it offers a continuously variable transmission (INVECS‑III CVT) that can provide smoother acceleration in stop‑and‑go traffic. The Picanto, however, delivers higher peak output – 84 PS and 122 Nm versus the Mirage’s 78 PS and 100 Nm – and uses a 5‑speed manual, which may appeal to drivers who prefer more control and better fuel‑economy at higher speeds. The Mirage’s 1.2‑litre inline‑3 engine is slightly smaller (1193 cc) than the Picanto’s 1248 cc inline‑4, but both meet Euro‑4 emissions. In terms of practicality, both have five doors and five seats; the Picanto’s length is listed at 3595 mm, while the Mirage’s dimensions are not provided, so no direct size comparison can be made. Choose the Mirage if you value a CVT for effortless city cruising and can absorb the higher price. Opt for the Picanto if you want a lower purchase price, more power, and a manual gearbox for a more engaging drive.
Frequently asked questions
Which model is cheaper?
The Kia Picanto 1.2 MT is cheaper at ₱635,000 compared to the Mitsubishi Mirage 1.2 GLX CVT at ₱688,000.
Which car has more power?
The Kia Picanto produces 84 PS and 122 Nm, while the Mitsubishi Mirage produces 78 PS and 100 Nm, so the Picanto is more powerful.
Is there a transmission advantage?
The Mirage comes with an INVECS‑III CVT for smooth automatic driving, whereas the Picanto uses a 5‑speed manual transmission, offering driver control.
Which vehicle is better for daily commuting in the city?
Both are B‑segment hatchbacks suitable for city use, but the Mirage’s CVT may provide easier stop‑and‑go comfort, while the Picanto’s lower price and higher power may appeal to budget‑conscious commuters who prefer a manual.