Porsche Macan Turbo (2016) vs Toyota Land Cruiser Prado 2.4 Turbo AT (2025)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Porsche Macan Turbo (2016) vs Toyota Land Cruiser Prado 2.4 Turbo AT (2025) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Porsche Macan Turbo (2016) Porsche ₱8,000,000 | Toyota Land Cruiser Prado 2.4 Turbo AT (2025) Toyota ₱4,806,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2016 | 2025 |
| Warranty | Unlimited/2-years | 3-years/100,000km |
| Availability | Discontinued | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | V6 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 3604cc | 2393cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 24-valve | DOHC 16-valve |
| Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | — |
| Aspiration | Twin-turbo | Turbocharged |
| Fuel Type | Gas | Gasoline |
| Max Power | 400 HP @ 6000 rpm | 281 PS @ 6000 rpm |
| Max Torque | 550 Nm @1350-4500 rpm | 430 Nm @ 1700 - 3600 rpm |
| Transmission | 7-Speed PDK | 8-A/T |
| Drivetrain | AWD | 4WD |
| Performance & Economy | ||
| 0–100 km/h | 10.5 km/l | — |
| Top Speed | 17.9 km/l | — |
| Fuel Economy (City) | 14.1 km/l | — |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | SUV | Large Crossover SUV |
| Segment | J | SUV |
| Construction | Unibody | Body-on-frame |
| Doors | 4 | 5 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3 | 2+3+2 |
| Length (mm) | 4699 | 4925 |
| Width (mm) | 1923 | 1980 |
| Height (mm) | 1624 | 1935 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2807 | 2850 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 1925 | 2400 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | 75 | 110 |
| Exterior Colors | — | Black Mica, Pearl White Mica, Avant-Garde Bronze |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | Double wishbone | Double Wishbone, Coil Spring |
| Rear Suspension | Self tracking trapezoidal link | Multi-Link w/ Coil Spring |
| Front Wheels | 19 Alloy | 20 |
| Rear Wheels | 19 Alloy | 20 |
| Front Tires | 235/55 R 19 | 265/60/R20 |
| Rear Tires | 235/55 R 19 | 265/60/R20 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Steering Type | Electric Assist | EPS |
| Steering Column | tilt | Tilt + Telescopic |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | Yes |
| Differential Lock | No | Yes |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | Yes | No |
| Parking Sensors | No | No |
| Stability Control | No | No |
| Traction Control | Yes | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | Yes |
| Hill Start Assist | No | Yes |
| Hill Descent Control | No | Yes |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | No |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | No |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | No | Yes |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Automatic Climate Control | Dual Zone Automatic Climate Control |
| Rear A/C Vents | No | No |
| Seat Material | Leather | Leather |
| Parking Brake | Automatic | EPB |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | No | No |
| Cruise Control | No | Yes |
| Multi-Info Display | No | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | No |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | No | Yes |
| Power Seats | No | Yes |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | Yes |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | no | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Touchscreen | Yes | Yes |
| Navigation | No | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | No | Yes |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| AUX Input | Yes | No |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | No |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | No |
| iPod Support | Yes | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Speakers | — | 10 |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | HID | LED |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | Yes | Yes |
Porsche Macan Turbo (2016) vs Toyota Land Cruiser Prado 2.4 Turbo AT (2025): which should you buy?
For the Filipino buyer prioritizing daily practicality, resale value, and lower entry cost, the Toyota Land Cruiser Prado 2.4 Turbo AT is the clear choice. At ₱4,806,000, it is significantly cheaper than the Porsche Macan Turbo (2016) which lists at ₱8,000,000. The Prado also offers a more robust construction with a body-on-frame design and higher seating capacity (2+3+2) compared to the Macan's 5-door layout. While the Porsche offers superior performance with 400 HP versus the Prado's 281 PS, the Macan is discontinued with only an unlimited/2-year warranty, whereas the Prado is current with a standard 3-year warranty. Unless you specifically require the luxury V6 performance of the Porsche, the Prado provides better value, practicality, and availability.
Frequently asked questions
Which vehicle is cheaper?
The Toyota Land Cruiser Prado 2.4 Turbo AT is cheaper, priced at ₱4,806,000 compared to the Porsche Macan Turbo (2016) at ₱8,000,000.
Which car has more power?
The Porsche Macan Turbo (2016) is more powerful, producing 400 HP, whereas the Toyota Land Cruiser Prado 2.4 Turbo AT produces 281 PS.
Which vehicle is better for daily commuting?
The Toyota Land Cruiser Prado 2.4 Turbo AT is better for daily commuting due to its lower price, higher seating capacity (2+3+2), and current availability.
What is the warranty period for each car?
The Porsche Macan Turbo (2016) has an unlimited/2-year warranty, while the Toyota Land Cruiser Prado 2.4 Turbo AT offers a 3-year/100,000km warranty.