SsangYong Rodius 2.0 AT EX 9 (2016) vs Geely EX5 EM-i Max (2026)

A full spec-by-spec comparison of SsangYong Rodius 2.0 AT EX 9 (2016) vs Geely EX5 EM-i Max (2026) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.

Specification SsangYong Rodius 2.0 AT EX 9 (2016) Ssangyong ₱1,490,000 Geely EX5 EM-i Max (2026) Geely ₱1,468,000
Overview
Model Year 2016 2026
Warranty 100,000km/3-years —
Availability Current Current
Engine & Drivetrain
Engine Type Inline-4 Inline-4
Displacement 1998cc 1498cc
Valvetrain DOHC 16-valve 16-Valve
Aspiration Turbocharged, Direct Injection Naturally Aspirated
Fuel Type Diesel PHEV
Max Power 155 Ps @ 4000 rpm 99 PS
Max Torque 360 Nm @ 2800 rpm 125 Nm
Transmission 5-Speed A/T 1DHT Automatic
Drivetrain 2WD FWD
Body & Dimensions
Body Type MPV Midsize Crossover SUV
Segment M Crossover
Construction Unibody Unibody
Doors 5 5
Seating Capacity 2+3 5
Length (mm) 5130 4740
Width (mm) 1915 1905
Height (mm) 1815 1685
Wheelbase (mm) 0 2755
Exterior Colors — Alpine White, Coudveil Silver, Volcanic Grey, Polar Black, Glacier Blue, Jungle Green
Curb Weight (kg) — 1770
Fuel Tank (L) — 51
Chassis, Wheels & Brakes
Front Wheels 16'' Aluminum Alloy 19 Alloys
Rear Wheels 16'' Aluminum Alloy 19 Alloy
Front Tires 225/65R16 245/45R19
Rear Tires 225/65R16 245/45 R19
Steering Column tilt Tilt
Tire Pressure Monitoring No —
Differential Lock No —
Front Suspension — MacPherson Strut
Rear Suspension — Multi-Link
Front Brakes — Disc
Rear Brakes — Disc
Steering Type — EPS
Safety
Anti-lock Braking (ABS) No Yes
Electronic Brakeforce Distribution No Yes
Brake Assist No Yes
Parking Sensors No Yes
Stability Control No Yes
Traction Control No Yes
Vehicle Dynamic Control No —
Forward Collision Mitigation No —
Blind Spot Warning No —
Hill Start Assist No —
Hill Descent Control No —
Auto Stop/Start No —
Driver Airbag No Yes
Knee Airbag No Yes
Passenger Airbag No Yes
Front Curtain Airbags No Yes
Rear Curtain Airbags No Yes
Rear Side Airbags No —
Engine Immobilizer No Yes
Security Alarm No Yes
Door Locking Central Locking Central Locking
Comfort & Convenience
Rear A/C Vents Yes —
Seat Material Leather Fabric
Parking Brake Manual EPB
Key Type Keyless Entry Keyless
Push-Button Start No Yes
Cruise Control No Yes
Multi-Info Display No —
Paddle Shifters No —
Reverse Camera No Yes
Auto Headlights No —
Power Windows No Yes
Power Seats No —
Remote Trunk Release No —
Eco Mode No —
Antenna no —
Air Conditioning — Automatic Climate Control
Infotainment & Audio
Touchscreen Yes Yes
Navigation No —
Bluetooth No Yes
Apple CarPlay No Yes
Android Auto No Yes
USB Yes —
AUX Input Yes —
AM/FM Radio Yes Yes
CD Player Yes —
DVD Player No —
MP3 Playback Yes —
iPod Support No —
SD Card Slot No —
Speakers — 6
Lighting
Headlights Projector Headlamps LED
Fog Lights Yes —
Daytime Running Lights No —
Keep comparing Add another model to this matchup — line up to four side by side.

SsangYong Rodius 2.0 AT EX 9 (2016) vs Geely EX5 EM-i Max (2026): which should you buy?

For a Filipino buyer looking for practicality and affordability, the SsangYong Rodius 2.0 AT EX 9 is recommended. It offers better value with comparable power output and features at a lower price point.

Frequently asked questions

Which vehicle has more powerful engine?

The Geely EX5 EM-i Max has a higher maximum torque of 125 Nm compared to the SsangYong Rodius 2.0 AT EX 9's 360 Nm, but both have similar max power outputs.

Which car is more fuel efficient?

The Geely EX5 EM-i Max uses a PHEV (Plug-in Hybrid Electric Vehicle) system which can be more efficient in terms of fuel consumption compared to the SsangYong Rodius 2.0 AT EX 9's diesel engine.

Which car is better for daily commuting?

The Geely EX5 EM-i Max, being a crossover SUV with FWD and having a higher max torque, might be slightly more suitable for daily commuting compared to the SsangYong Rodius' MPV configuration.

Which vehicle has a longer wheelbase?

The Geely EX5 EM-i Max has a shorter length of 4740mm compared to the SsangYong Rodius 2.0 AT EX 9's 5130mm, making it slightly smaller in size.